https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
--- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Bauer ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #4)
> My other thought was to make a string of the process ID and arguments from
> proc as that might also fix the wine case?
The process ID would also
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
--- Comment #7 from Wolfgang Bauer ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #6)
> I meant the process name, as in "dolphin" or "wine".
Ok. Yes, that sounds reasonable, I actually thought that myself already...
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
milanspk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markovic.mi...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
--- Comment #6 from David Edmundson ---
I meant the process name, as in "dolphin" or "wine".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
--- Comment #4 from David Edmundson ---
>But wouldn't it be possible to use the title, and only fall back to the
>windowId when the title is empty?
Should be, slow part is the testing rather than the implementing. I'll give
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
Wolfgang Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wba...@tmo.at
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356655
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|