https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
--- Comment #23 from Ahmad Samir ---
I see, thanks for the info.
Let's keep it open until someone who knows that info chimes in (I wasn't around
at that time, and git.reviewboard.kde.org was taken down a long time ago, so I
don't have easy access to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
--- Comment #22 from Hector Martin ---
The UI was there in KDE4. It was lost in KDE5. Do you have a reference as to
why it was removed?
When 57240 was closed, there was no UI and no intent to add an UI. A UI was
later added anyway. Clearly someone
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
--- Comment #21 from Ahmad Samir ---
AFAICS, the removal of the UI was intentional because it is in-line with the
comments in bug 57240 (e.g. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57240#c75).
Also I don't see a UI being added for this.
(From my point
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
Hector Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
Ahmad Samir changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.samir...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
--- Comment #18 from Ahmad Samir ---
*** Bug 428045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
manli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manli...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
jfblag...@posteo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Archlinux Packages |Debian testing
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
jfblag...@posteo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfblag...@posteo.net
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
FabiB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|plusf...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
torkel...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torkel...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
--- Comment #15 from vmel...@yahoo.com ---
It’s too bad that this wasn’t nailed down from day 1. It is sort of like some
countries have right side road driving while others are left side road driving.
For end users, I have noticed that they don’t care
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
--- Comment #14 from Hector Martin ---
Of course JEDEC would use the binary definition; their entire business is
basically RAM and Flash specifications. They are basically the only
organization with a reason to prefer binary powers of 2, as they define
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
vmel...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmel...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
Hector Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hec...@marcansoft.com
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
Jérôme Borme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jerome.bo...@laposte.net
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
postix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pos...@posteo.eu
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||usability
See Also|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364321
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Summary|No ability to switch
19 matches
Mail list logo
