[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2024-01-24 Thread Paul Floyd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 Paul Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pjfl...@wanadoo.fr --- Comment #40 from Paul

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2022-07-10 Thread Sam James
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@gentoo.org -- You are receiving this mail

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2017-05-22 Thread Graham Leggett
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #39 from Graham Leggett --- For the record, moving /etc/ld.so.preload out of the way and in the process disabling the RPI's memcpy optimisations causes valgrind to run correctly on the RPi. -- You are receiving this mail

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2017-05-20 Thread Graham Leggett
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 Graham Leggett changed: What|Removed |Added CC||minf...@sharp.fm ---

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2017-02-01 Thread WernerF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 WernerF changed: What|Removed |Added CC||werner.fr...@web.de --- Comment

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2017-02-01 Thread Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexander.ress...@gmail.com ---

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2017-02-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #35 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Julian Seward from comment #27) > This keeps cropping up, for example most recently in bug 366464. Maybe > I should explain more why this isn't supported > > Truth be told, I

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Mark Wielaard via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #34 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Peter Maydell from comment #33) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #32) > > valgrind should already intercept the memcmp from glibc. This one however is > > in a different

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Peter Maydell via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #33 from Peter Maydell --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #32) > valgrind should already intercept the memcmp from glibc. This one however is > in a different library libcofi_rpi.so which looks like some

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Mark Wielaard via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com --- Comment

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Peter Maydell via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #31 from Peter Maydell --- If your JIT architecture doesn't permit a QEMU-style approach I would be tempted to go with "implement SETEND to throw away JITted code and print a warning about poor performance". At the

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Peter Maydell via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #29 from Peter Maydell --- The way QEMU's JIT handles this kind of thing is that we track each translated code block by (start PC, cpu state flags), where the flags track the subset of the CPU's current state that

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Julian Seward via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 Julian Seward changed: What|Removed |Added CC||noloa...@gmail.com ---

[valgrind] [Bug 322935] disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200, valgrind: Unrecognised instruction on Raspbian

2016-09-15 Thread Julian Seward via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322935 --- Comment #27 from Julian Seward --- This keeps cropping up, for example most recently in bug 366464. Maybe I should explain more why this isn't supported. It's because we don't have a feasible way to do it. Valgrind's JIT