On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:46:03AM -0500, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:17, Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:09:23PM -0500, Ian Monroe wrote:
(making sure local branches track the correct remote branches,
nothing to be done here.
really?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 18:13, Alex Merry k...@randomguy3.me.uk wrote:
On 21/03/11 20:17, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:
Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :)
I'm thinking I should just go ahead and rename KDE/4.6 to 4.6 etc.
Wasn't the
On 22/03/2011, Ian Monroe i...@monroe.nu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 18:13, Alex Merry k...@randomguy3.me.uk wrote:
On 21/03/11 20:17, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:
Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :)
I'm thinking I should just go ahead
Em domingo, 20 de março de 2011, às 13:38:40, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill them?
BTW, the only reason why they are there is because I
Em terça-feira, 22 de março de 2011, às 16:41:14, Thiago Macieira escreveu:
Em domingo, 20 de março de 2011, às 13:38:40, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
On Monday 21 Mar 2011 14:19:09 Ian Monroe wrote:
Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :)
Yay, thanks Ben! Mental note to buy Ben yet another beer at Akademy.
I'm thinking I should just go ahead and rename KDE/4.6 to 4.6 etc.
Do we know what the consequences are? Does this damage the
- Original Message -
Come to think of it, perhaps it's the Release Team who should have
final say
on the branch naming, they may have requirements that we haven't
thought of?
I think I can say on behalf of the release-team, that we don't care much as
long as it is consistent over all
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:57:03PM +, Tom Albers wrote:
Though if it needs a reclone for everyone we need to pick a date and
*communicate* it. Let's say this weekend?
reclone? hello?
git fetch
git checkout 4.6
- Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:57:03PM +, Tom Albers wrote:
Though if it needs a reclone for everyone we need to pick a date and
*communicate* it. Let's say this weekend?
reclone? hello?
I think I've stated my question in a way that makes clear that I did not
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:41, Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:57:03PM +, Tom Albers wrote:
Though if it needs a reclone for everyone we need to pick a date and
*communicate* it. Let's say this weekend?
reclone? hello?
git fetch
git checkout 4.6
On Monday 21 March 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:17, Ian Monroe i...@monroe.nu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz ahartm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create
- Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:06:51PM +, Tom Albers wrote:
Git might be known by you inside out, but please note that is not
the
case for everyone.
it's one thing not to know everything inside out and another not to
understand what a ref actually is ...
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:24:24PM +, Tom Albers wrote:
I'm a team player, that means I trust on others to educate me, correct me
you may have noticed that all the job ads looking for team players also
emphasize independence and self-motivation. i.e., the ability to
complete day-to-day tasks
- Original Message -
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:24:24PM +, Tom Albers wrote:
I'm a team player, that means I trust on others to educate me,
correct me
you may have noticed that all the job ads looking for team players
also
emphasize independence and self-motivation. i.e., the
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in places
where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill them?
Albert
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz ahartm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill
On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:17:11 Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz ahartm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:57, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of git.
There's no reason to let non-admins create version branches
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and
On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:59:55 Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g
On 20 March 2011 15:01, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
A Diumenge, 20 de març de 2011, John Tapsell va escriure:
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
How are you supposed to work on a feature-branch otherwise?
By having it in your own git repository.
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 15:02:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches
On 03/20/2011 04:17 PM, John Tapsell wrote:
By having it in your own git repository. This is how Qt does it.
Anyone can clone the Qt repository on the server and create branches
in their own clone.
For example, here is mine: http://qt.gitorious.org/~johnflux- and
other people can (and do)
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:57, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server
anyway?
Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of git.
On Sunday, 20 de March de 2011 15:09:26 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill them?
26 matches
Mail list logo
