Hi,
- Original Message -
On March 10, 2011 12:49:16 John Layt wrote:
I've offered previously to mod those lists, I'd be happy to take
them on
now. I think I also previously said we can get rid of the kde-print
list,
it's had about 5 mails in the 18 months so I don't think it
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in places
where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill them?
Albert
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
[1]
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/openpr
inting- summit-san-francisco-2011
[2]
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/commonp
rintingdialog
Hi,
I'm very happy to read that there is
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz ahartm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill
On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:17:11 Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:09, Andreas Hartmetz ahartm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:57, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of git.
There's no reason to let non-admins create version branches
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and
On Sunday 20 March 2011 15:59:55 Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g
On 20 March 2011 15:01, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
A Diumenge, 20 de març de 2011, John Tapsell va escriure:
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server anyway?
How are you supposed to work on a feature-branch otherwise?
By having it in your own git repository.
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 15:02:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:09, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches
On 03/20/2011 04:17 PM, John Tapsell wrote:
By having it in your own git repository. This is how Qt does it.
Anyone can clone the Qt repository on the server and create branches
in their own clone.
For example, here is mine: http://qt.gitorious.org/~johnflux- and
other people can (and do)
On Sunday 20 March 2011, Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:57, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:45, John Tapsell wrote:
Why do we let people create branches on the main git server
anyway?
Well for feature branches its fine and kind of the point of git.
On Sunday, 20 de March de 2011 15:09:26 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2011 14:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Can you please be careful and do not create incorrectly 4.6 branches in
places where the branch is called KDE/4.6 (e.g kdelibs and kde-runtime)
Ian can you kill them?
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Christoph Bartoschek
bartosc...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
[1]
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/openpr
inting- summit-san-francisco-2011
[2]
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb todd rme:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Christoph Bartoschek
bartosc...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
[1]
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/ope
npr
inting-
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb Christoph Bartoschek:
I've disabled this and made 3 screenshots showing the general dialog.
http://www.pontohonk.de/screenshots/cpd-1.png
http://www.pontohonk.de/screenshots/cpd-2.png
http://www.pontohonk.de/screenshots/cpd-3.png
The screenshots show another
Hi,
Some very good points, some definately belong in the dialog, others belong in
CUPS itself, but I'll take them all with me as everyone will be at the summit.
- My biggest wish for a printing dialog is that the preview exactly matches
the output. All current print dialogs that I know on
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 16:50:22 todd rme wrote:
In general it would be nice to see screenshots of the available
options and how they are laid out.
-Todd
I'd post some but for two problems. 1) It segfaults on my machine right now,
some Qt issue 2) The ui interaction is really not close to
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 17:48:09 Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
Hi,
do you refer to the dialog I see for one of our printers? Which options do
you want to see? The General tab?
By the way, is there any reason to prevent resizing of the dialog?
I've disabled this and made 3 screenshots
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John Layt johnl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sunday 20 Mar 2011 17:48:09 Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
Hi,
do you refer to the dialog I see for one of our printers? Which options do
you want to see? The General tab?
By the way, is there any reason to prevent
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb John Layt:
Hi,
Some very good points, some definately belong in the dialog, others belong
in CUPS itself, but I'll take them all with me as everyone will be at the
summit.
For me as user it does not matter where it is implemented. However I think
this all
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Christoph Bartoschek bartosc...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sonntag 20 März 2011 schrieb todd rme:
Just out of curiosity, what widget style is being used for the
screenshots?
This should be oxygen from KDE 4.4
Is it a problem that the dialog doesn't look like a native
23 matches
Mail list logo
