https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487049
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355342
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thank you David! I really appreciate it!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453298
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389608
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387550
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457262
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Also see: Bug 457263 - Configure Message-Id per identity or SMTP resource.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457263
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457263
Bug ID: 457263
Summary: Configure Message-Id per identity or SMTP resource
Product: kmail2
Version: 5.20.3
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457262
Bug ID: 457262
Summary: Generate privacy-aware Message-Ids
Product: kmail2
Version: 5.20.3
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REPORTED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443095
Bug ID: 443095
Summary: Moving mails to a different folder is very slow
Product: Akonadi
Version: 5.18.1
Platform: Other
OS: Other
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361588
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424231
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424231
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Good catch, Victor, read the "Bad bad Microsoft..." comment for a reasoning
behind this.
https://invent.kde.org/pim/kdepim-runtime/-/blob/master/resources/ews/ewsclient/auth/ewsoauth.cpp
If you l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424231
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thank you. That is an important clarification. If your company Intune policy
allows the use of Linux clients and the login works with Evolution EWS, then it
indeed appears to be an issue with Akonadi EWS.
Did
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424231
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422624
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Jonas Schäfer from comment #17)
> I would like to confirm the imap resource problem being similar, but I don’t
> know which specific perf invocation produces output like the one shown
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Sander van Grieken from comment #15)
> I'm not so sure the root cause is the maildir resource. I'm experiencing
> major slowdowns using imap resource as well.
Maybe. However for now I s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414178
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422490
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #13 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Strace output when maildir resources takes ages to complete a synchronization:
[pid 7806] poll([{fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 2, 55
[pid 7815] write(5, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #12 from Martin Steigerwald ---
See also:
Bug 422624 - Akonadi does full rescan on every change in maildir
as well as reopened
Bug 334209 - synchronizes folder contents during runtime needlessly when
switching between different folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422624
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #1)
> Means: It did this needless synchronization before, bug before the
but
> performance regression in Akonadi 5.14.1 (aka 20.04) it was much quicker and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334209
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|GIT (master)|5.14.1
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422624
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #10)
> Marc, thank you a lot for your analysis in comment #2. I just noticed it
> now. I bet it can be valuable help for the developers to pinpoint the iss
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #10 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Marc, thank you a lot for your analysis in comment #2. I just noticed it now. I
bet it can be valuable help for the developers to pinpoint the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
An awkward work-around demonstrates that it really is Akonadi maildir resource.
If I terminate the akonadi_maildir_resource process KMail almost immediately
becomes responsive again. But if I do this for more
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #7)
> With a folder with about 30500 it just got that back that KMail gave up
> waiting after some minutes:
it just got that bad
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
With a folder with about 30500 it just got that back that KMail gave up waiting
after some minutes:
"Unable to fetch item from backend (collection -1): Unable to contact
resource."
Why "-1&q
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #54 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Tore, thank you again for your recent findings. Just to let you know: I was not
doubting it. In my experience Akonadi based KMail with IMAP never really worked
with folders with more than maybe 1-2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
- Open a folder with just about 13000 mails
- Click on it for the first time in a KMail/Akonadi session or after a while
you used it last again
- Wait for one minute for Akonadi to deliver the payload
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.5.2 |5.14.1
--- Comment #53 from Martin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #48 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Gunter, sorry for spelling your name wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Erik Quaeghebeur from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #4)
> > 1) Why does it synchronize the folder anyway when I hit delete the folder
> > mail lis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422490
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|maildir gets stuck on |maildir resource gets stuck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334216
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334216
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|GIT (master)|5.14.1
Platform|unspecified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.0 |5.14.1
--- Comment #5 from Martin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422336
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|general |Maildir Resource
Product
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422490
Bug ID: 422490
Summary: maildir gets stuck on synchronizing a folder with 72
messages
Product: Akonadi
Version: 5.14.1
Platform: Debian unstable
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412629
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Does the fix in
libqt5sql5-psql: basic support postgresql-12
https://bugs.debian.org/941763
fix this issue or not?
Or in other words: Has this been fixed or is it still an issue? I am asking,
cause
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412629
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403903
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Continuing the work when Office 365 becomes available again is important.
However I wonder whether it would be possible to avoid ErrorServerBusy. But
well, as long as Microsoft does not tell how much load
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343114
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
David, Akonadi 5.7.3 is quite old, from KDEPIM 18.04 from April 2018 if I got
this right.
I am still not clear whether it is really the same bug, as I for me the
original issue did not happen anymore since
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343114
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Dear David, thanks for adding your update to the bug report. However, if you
change the version please also really set a new version, instead of setting
'unspecified'. Do 'akonadictl --version' and specify
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341909
--- Comment #19 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I am also seeing local time. With KDEPIM/Akonadi 18.08 on Debian Sid.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388036
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409122
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #21 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Dan, thank you very much! I appreciate your work on Akonadi & KDEPIM!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #18 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 120932
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120932=edit
akonadiserver.error with english locale, PostgreSQL properly shut down
(In reply to Daniel Vrátil from comment #17)
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #16 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 120924
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120924=edit
akonadiserver.error log with akonadictl --verbose start on second start reusing
existing PostgreSQL processes
On sec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #15 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 120923
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120923=edit
akonadiserver.error log with akonadictl --verbose start
With KDEPIM/Akonadi 18.08 (I know, still outdated, Debian in d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407169
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406856
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Nick, which version are you testing on? Do you use KDEPIM 18.12 or later by
chance? If so could you please update the version number to the output of
'akonadictl --version'?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.6.1 |5.10.3
--- Comment #11 from Martin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thank you Axel for confirming on recent version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406958
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Christophe, come on now: 5.9.2 is also available.
Okay, I bring this up on kdepim-devel mailing list. 18.08 is not even a year
old.
You are basically telling Linux distro users to get lost by closing bugs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thing is: yes, I understand that it would be tedious to receive bug reports of
long fixed bugs with versions that are 2 or more years old. But 18.08 is not
even a year.
If you are implying that you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
18.08 unmaintained already?
Well, FWIW Dan asked me whether Akonadi crashes which may prevent a proper
database shutdown¹.
Now I did and even used an existing bug report and you just closed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406087
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks, Wolfgang, for letting us know. I hope after release of Debian Buster I
can get updated KDEPIM packages for Debian again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386173
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389607
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Just to confirm that this still happens with Akonadi 5.9.3 (KDEPIM/Akonadi
18.08).
Here are some examples of an akonadictl fsck run after switching to PostgreSQL
database backend just a few weeks ago
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406087
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sorry 5.9.3 is KDEPIM/Akonadi 18.08.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406958
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Sorry 5.9.3 is KDEPIM/Akonadi 18.08.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406958
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406087
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I also reported a bug about those unreferenced files to begin with:
Bug 406958 Unreferenced files in file_db_data
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406958
Bug ID: 406958
Summary: Unreferenced files in file_db_data
Product: Akonadi
Version: 5.9.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406087
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406856
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Dan, I just like to remind kindly. This regular crash together with a host of
other issues add up and make the KDEPIM experience with KDEPIM/Akonadi 18.08
quite a bit less enjoyable than with previous
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #13 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks, Christian.
Dan, could you have the look at the valgrind traces I produced? The third one
would be the most accurate one, I believe.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 118575
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118575=edit
third valgrind run, with all dbgsym package and crash
Another valgrind run. Hopefully this one is enough to find the is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #10 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 118539
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118539=edit
second valgrind run, with error-limit=no
Second valgrind run:
valgrind --error-limit=no --track-origins=yes --num-call
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I have KMail running under valgrind now. Did not like to crash so far, tough.
Once it crashes, it is safe to send the valgrind log to the bugtracker
regarding privacy? It currently is 2,1 MiB and it did
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405005
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
--- Comment #59 from Martin Steigerwald ---
(In reply to Peter Humphrey from comment #58)
> (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #55)
> > It is a security reason. You could receive an HTML mail that looks like a
> > plain text mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393421
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #57 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390798
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|REMIND |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Is this backtrace – after installing libkf5akonadicore5abi2-dbgsym and
libkf5coreaddons5-dbgsym – more useful? I may come around to the valgrind
thing, if still required, next week:
Application: KMail (kmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403903
--- Comment #14 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Aaron, thank you for the updates. I totally understand your situation and
frustration. I did not opt in for Office 365 either. I currently use Evolution
with EWS, which appears to work – will have another go
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402780
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403903
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Thanks a lot for the detailed traces. Let's hope Kriss can have a look at it.
(I am in the same position as my employer decided to migrate to Office 365.
Privately I will keep Dovecot.)
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404079
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403903
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Bug 404079 - EWS will not download new email anymore after a:ErrorServerBusy:
The server cannot service this request right now. Try again later.
is related. Apparently Akonadi EWS can get completely stuck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404079
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|EWS will not download new |EWS will not download new
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403903
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de
Summary
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404079
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390260
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|REMIND |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Okay, on one hand DrKonqi does not thing the backtraces are related, on the
other hand it truncates the backtrace when I tell it to add it to the bug
report. Since I do not know whether DrKonqi got this right
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald ---
Created attachment 117912
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=117912=edit
New crash information added by DrKonqi
kmail (5.9.3) using Qt 5.11.3
- What I was doing when the application cras
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
Martin Steigerwald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Crash after filtering |Crash during/after
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404052
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald ---
I do not know why DrKonqi reduced the backtrace. It definately looked longer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 - 100 of 816 matches
Mail list logo