https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Sergio, I tried:
107 QStringList listNew() const
108 {
109 static int count = 0; count++;
110 static int elapsed = 0;
111
112 QDir d( path +
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #10 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Sergio, I tried:
107 QStringList listNew() const
108 {
109 static int count = 0; count++;
110 static int elapsed = 0;
111
112 QDir d( path +
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
I don´t know whether this is called and what that does, but setting nosort here
as well for testing:
diff --git a/resources/maildir/libmaildir/keycache.cpp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #12 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Created attachment 86428
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=86428action=edit
callgrind with nodirsorting also in libmaildir/keycache.cpp
Well this is it. KMail is usable even with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
I bet that stat()ing files isn´t the only issue here, as find -ls also uses a
variant of the stat() call on each file and as demonstrated it way faster:
Warm caches:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Compared to this
strace of
martin@merkaba:~#16 ps aux | head -1 ; ps aux | grep akonadi_maildir_resource
| grep -v grep
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Created attachment 86406
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=86406action=edit
callgrind data of 5 minutes cpu busy maildir resource
About 5 minute callgrind data with akonadi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #86406|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Testing with:
diff --git a/resources/maildir/libmaildir/maildir.cpp
b/resources/maildir/libmaildir/maildir.cpp
index 9bd3802..36166ed 100644
--- a/resources/maildir/libmaildir/maildir.cpp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Suggestion was from David Faure and Sergio.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Created attachment 86418
-- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=86418action=edit
second callgrind of about well at least half an hour, after nodirsorting patch
applied
This one looks a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334218
--- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
During this callgrind run KMail did respond in between, so I really think
folder sync got faster by nodir sorting patch as during last callgrind of also
about half an hour or so it didn´t
12 matches
Mail list logo
