On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Charles-Antoine Couret
wrote:
> Le 04/04/2016 20:42, Justin Forbes a écrit :
>> Generally I would not be opposed to something like this being tied to an
>> option in .config, so users can choose whether or not they wish to disable
>>
Le 04/04/2016 20:42, Justin Forbes a écrit :
> Generally I would not be opposed to something like this being tied to an
> option in .config, so users can choose whether or not they wish to disable
> retests
It's a good idea, I will improve my patch. ;)
> (I personally retest frequently).
What
Generally I would not be opposed to something like this being tied to an
option in .config, so users can choose whether or not they wish to disable
retests (I personally retest frequently). Of course the default behavior
there would need to be allowing them (unchanged), but you can add
From dda596d968b7e09d821d842129b38a2771f63ebb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles-Antoine Couret
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:34:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add script shell wrapper to check if the wanted test was not
tested for current version.
It should
On Monday, April 4, 2016 3:49:10 PM CDT Charles-Antoine Couret wrote:
> Le 04/04/2016 15:11, Justin Forbes a écrit :
> > The patch seems to be MIA, forgot to attach maybe?
> >
> > Justin
>
> Curious, with GMail interface I see the patch. I will test with Thunderbird.
> ;) Regards,
>
Le 04/04/2016 15:11, Justin Forbes a écrit :
> The patch seems to be MIA, forgot to attach maybe?
>
> Justin
Curious, with GMail interface I see the patch. I will test with Thunderbird. ;)
Regards,
Charles-Antoine
___
kernel mailing list
The patch seems to be MIA, forgot to attach maybe?
Justin
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Charles-Antoine Couret
wrote:
> Hello,
> I submitted this patch because it is complicated for me to remember if
> my current kernel was tested by kernel tests and what tests have
Hello,
I submitted this patch because it is complicated for me to remember if
my current kernel was tested by kernel tests and what tests have been
executed too.
To avoid to verify manually or to execute twice the same test, I wrote
a script wrapper to check that automatically before executing the