From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1038#note_556029639
I adjusted the MR slightly to consolidate the now-identical Fedora and
ARK settings.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/563
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'ptalb...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'jcl...@redhat.com'.
Hi,
As part
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/454
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'ptalb...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'jcl...@redhat.com'.
Hi,
As part
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/729
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'acari...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'jcl...@redhat.com'.
Hi,
As part
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/729
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'acari...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'jcl...@redhat.com'.
Hi,
As part
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in arch/powerpc
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark directory.
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in arch/powerpc
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark directory.
From: Justin Forbes
Update CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
diff a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+++
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/560
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Justin Forbes
Update CONFIG_SPI_AMD based on Prarit's recommendations
Cc: Al Stone
diff a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_SPI_AMD
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_SPI_AMD
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_SPI_AMD
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_SPI_AMD
@@
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/396
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: CKI@GitLab
[redhat] New configs in drivers/spi
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark directory.
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in lib/Kconfig.debug
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Patrick Talbert
Update CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
diff a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KEY_NOTIFICATIONS
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KEY_NOTIFICATIONS
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KEY_NOTIFICATIONS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CONFIG_KEY_NOTIFICATIONS=y
diff
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/462
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in init/Kconfig
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark directory.
From: Patrick Talbert
Update CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
diff a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
@@ -1 +1 @@
-#
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in init/Kconfig
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark directory.
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/462
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Patrick Talbert
Update CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_SYSTEM
diff a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_SYSTEM
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_SYSTEM
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_SYSTEM
+++
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in drivers/dma-buf
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/457
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Patrick Talbert
Update CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
diff a/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
b/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE=y
diff
From: Fedora Kernel Team
New configs in lib/Kconfig.debug
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/425
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in drivers/vfio
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/748
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/748
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in drivers/vfio
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in crypto/Kconfig
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in crypto/Kconfig
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in crypto/Kconfig
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in lib/Kconfig.debug
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the
From: Patrick Talbert
Update CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM
diff a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM
@@ -1 +1 @@
-CONFIG_VIRTIO_MEM=m
+#
From: Fedora Kernel Team
[redhat] New configs in drivers/virtio
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pending directory to the ark
From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/454
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 03:10:15PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 6/8/20 2:58 PM, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Seeing the merge window configs rolling in along with people starting to
> > open GitLab merge requests rather than exclusively e
Hey folks,
Seeing the merge window configs rolling in along with people starting to
open GitLab merge requests rather than exclusively emailing patches, I
have a suggestion to make everyone's lives a bit easier, especially with
the configurations:
Start making use of the "developer" role[0] in
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 16:10:41 -0400, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Do you have an opinion on a reasonable limit? I don't know what Google's
> > SMTP servers allow without rate limiting, but that probably also needs
> > c
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:55:37PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 08:20:16 -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jwrdegoede
> wrote:
> > The patch series is too large to sent by email.
>
> Jeremy, 20 patches is not that many to send via email. What is the
> current limit?
>
It's
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 04:42:59PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:42:26PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> jeremycline wrote:
> > From: Jeremy Cline
> >
> > There are no static files at this time. I don't know the first thing
> > a
Sorry for the noise folks, there's a couple bugs in the comment bridge.
I've disabled it for the moment.
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:42:50PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of ['author']
wrote:
> From: Jeremy Cline on gitlab.com
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_reques
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:24:54PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I spoke with dzickus about this and he suggested I reach out to the list to
> get
> an idea of how to fix this.
>
> I originally pushed a branch "osnamechange" to gitlab and created merge
> request
> 354.
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:21:04PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 10:21:49 -0400, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > It's actually not CKI, just a few smoke tests (config validation, making
> > sure the SRPM builds) run on the free Gitlab runners. It'd be great to
> > get
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:57:31PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 07:22:45 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > IOW this is a chicken-and-egg problem and I'm not sure how get around it.
>
> In other words, patches are sent to the list only after they pass CKI?
> That's unexpected,
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:19:09PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> jforbes,
>
> My patch in merge request 354 changes the names of makefile targets from rh-*
> to
> dist-* which will obviously cause the failures in the tests below. It looks
> like I would have to also change the test code but
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:34:13PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
jeremycline wrote:
> From: Jeremy Cline
>
> Although the GitLab wiki is pretty nice for getting started, it doesn't
> offer a great way for folks to contribute or provide reviews for
> changes. Convert the curr
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:44:55AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:45:34PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:37:35 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > > Good idea and I think it would be a smart thing to do.
> >
> > I generally agree but I don't think "ark" is
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:23:47PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo!
>
> Am 20.04.20 um 16:41 schrieb Jeremy Cline:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:06:02PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> Am 17.04.20 um 20:55 schrieb Don Zickus:
> > […]
> >>> Is
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:06:02PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi Don!
>
> Am 17.04.20 um 20:55 schrieb Don Zickus:
> >
> > I know as Jeremy and Justin have rolled out changes recently there have been
>
> > concerns over technical and non-technical issues. While they are happy to
>
> >
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 08:34 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am 15.04.20 um 15:41 schrieb Jeremy Cline:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 11:31 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > Am 15.04.20 um 00:37 schrieb Jeremy Cline:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 15:33 +, Jeremy
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 13:10 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mer. 15 avr. 2020 à 13:34, Josh Boyer
> a écrit :
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:32 AM Thorsten Leemhuis <
> > fed...@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> ...
>
> > > There is one thing I really dislike about the scheme (one it
> > > didn't
> > >
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 18:50 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have ThinkPad T480s and after latest kernel upgrades on Rawhide I
> see something like:
>
> ```
> exit_boot() failed!
> efi_main() failed!
> ```
>
> Right after grub and then system reboots.
>
> I found on the internet that
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 11:15 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am 15.04.20 um 04:24 schrieb Paul Moore:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:52 PM Paul Moore
> > wrote:
> >
> > There is another change in the kernel's specfile relating to where
> > the
> > %buildid is inserted into the version string.
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 11:31 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am 15.04.20 um 00:37 schrieb Jeremy Cline:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 15:33 +0000, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 16:40 +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > >
> > > Just a note folks, the p
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 21:13 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 6:37 PM Jeremy Cline
> wrote:
> > Okay, this is now done. You may notice a number of stale options
> > made
> > their way back into the config files, it's on my to-do list to
> > clean
>
On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 15:33 +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 16:40 +0000, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This should come as no surprise to those who have been following
> > the
> > kernel list and/or saw Laura's Flock talk last s
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 16:40 +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This should come as no surprise to those who have been following the
> kernel list and/or saw Laura's Flock talk last summer, but there are
> some changes to the way the Fedora kernel is maintained coming in th
On Sun, 2020-04-05 at 19:29 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 6:00 PM Joel Wirāmu Pauling
> wrote:
> > Far more interested to make sure the AX200 wifi fixes land. I have
> > two FC32 machines that suffer.
> >
>
> That should probably be fixed with the 5.6.2 kernel landing,
On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 07:07 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 7:02 AM Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > >
> > > On 3/12/20 10:57 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > >
> > > > > The git tags are still
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 10:11 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This should come as no surprise to those who have been following
> > the
> > kernel list and/or saw Laura's Flock talk last summer, but there
> > are
> > some changes to the way the
Hi Neal,
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 06:21 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jeremy Cline
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This should come as no surprise to those who have been following
> > the
> > kernel list and/o
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 12:58 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jeremy Cline
> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This should come as no surprise to those who have been following
> > the
> > kernel list and/or saw Laura's Flock talk las
Hi folks,
This should come as no surprise to those who have been following the
kernel list and/or saw Laura's Flock talk last summer, but there are
some changes to the way the Fedora kernel is maintained coming in the
next couple of weeks.
For those folks who aren't committing directly to the
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 14:07 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Hi! These are the backported versions of the eDP backlight fixes for
> i915 that Lenovo asked me to try getting into the Fedora kernel in
> time
> for beta. Note that these are pending upstream in intel's
> drm-intel-next-queued tree, and will
On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 16:09 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/3/20 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > Yes you are right, it should probably be something like the
> > > > > > following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > %ifarch x86_64
> > > > > > Requires: alsa-sof-firmware
> > > > > >
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 09:09 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi! TWIMC just a quick heads up for the rc3 kernel rebase in rawhide,
> as
> I noticed a problem during my kernel vanilla builds that afaics will
> hit
> Fedora also and can easily be missed during the update afaics:
>
> The COPYING
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 22:09 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Paul Bolle schreef op do 02-01-2020 om 10:38 [+0100]:
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
> > ---
> > .../generic/x86/CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDAUDIO_CODEC~ |
> > 1 -
> > .../generic/x86/CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOF_CML_RT1011_RT5682_MACH
On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 15:10 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:00:39 -0600,
> Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:35 AM Chris Murphy <
> > li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Two baremetal systems and one VM hang with kernel-5.5.0-
> > >
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 11:39:20PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Here's yet another Kconfig symbol cleanup, now for v5.5-rc1. (Yes, I
> know we're already at v5.5-rc4 by now. I was busy with other things in
> December.)
>
> This series is - as always - boring to review and hard to test
> thoroughly.
Hi folks,
This week is the test week for 5.4 so next week, assuming all goes well,
we'll be rebasing Fedora 31 to 5.4. You should expect to see 5.4 in
updates testing for Fedora 31 sometime next week (I make no promises as
to exactly when as I, like many other folks, will be on vacation).
Fedora
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:57:35AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So vboxsf has finally landed upstream. I gave up getting it merged
> > directly under fs/vboxsf since despite some fs-devel folks saying
> > that it was
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 09:41:22AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/22/19 11:36 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > On 8/22/19 8:58 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > > On 8/19/19 9:15 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > > On 8/16/19 2:57 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > > > Florian Weimer schreef op vr
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:20:54PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Here's yet another Kconfig symbol cleanup, now for v5.4-rc1.
>
> This series is - as always - boring to review and hard to test
> thoroughly. (I build-tested this on x86_64, but a sufficiently paranoid
> tester would like to build-test
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:21:34PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> ---
> configs/fedora/generic/powerpc/CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL | 1 +
> configs/fedora/generic/powerpc/CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL_DETECT_DMIC | 1 +
> kernel-ppc64le-debug.config | 2 +-
>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Jeremy Cline schreef op do 10-10-2019 om 09:31 [-0400]:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:20:54PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > Anyhow, working on this I thought of a way to sort-of do this during
> > > reg
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:59:39PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas schreef op do 10-10-2019 om 13:38 [+0200]:
> > configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_EFI_TEST| 2 +-
> > [...]
> > kernel-aarch64-debug.config | 2 +-
> > kernel-aarch64.config
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:38:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver is needed for testing purposes, enable it on the architectures
> where EFI is supported. Also, disallow access to the registered device if
> the kernel is locked down.
Applied, thanks.I did see the bugzilla,
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:20:54PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Here's yet another Kconfig symbol cleanup, now for v5.4-rc1.
>
> This series is - as always - boring to review and hard to test
> thoroughly. (I build-tested this on x86_64, but a sufficiently paranoid
> tester would like to
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:18:24AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-06-19 15:36, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10-06-19 15:31, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > First of all this is a known issue and it seems a fix is in the works,
> > > but what I do not
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 03:36:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-06-19 15:31, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > First of all this is a known issue and it seems a fix is in the works,
> > but what I do not understand is why the commit causing this has not
> > simply been
Hi,
On 5/17/19 4:16 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:08:17PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 5/16/19 2:42 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 06:38:38PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
Hi Jiri,
On 4/2/19 6:35 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hi,
please consider attached change
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 08:42:09PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Justin Forbes schreef op wo 22-05-2019 om 06:43 [-0500]:
> > While it is valid at the moment, it will not be valid once the 5.2
> > secureboot look is redone.
>
> Thanks for reviewing this patch.
>
> > That patch was
Hi folks,
Another kernel release, another rebase plans email.
kernel v5.1 was released yesterday and is now available in the Rawhide
repository. We'll be following the usual rebase procedure: after a few
stable updates (5.1.2 or 5.1.3) Fedora 30 will be rebased, with Fedora
29 following shortly
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:01:02AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> I had a local v5.1 build hang for the second (or third) time because I
> once again forgot to cherry-pick Jeremy's fixup of
> configs/process_configs.sh from commit ece644100170 ("Linux
> v5.0-6399-gf90d64483ebd"). I'm positive Jeremy
On 5/1/19 7:29 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Paul Bolle schreef op di 12-03-2019 om 22:58 [+0100]:
The rule that generates kernel-ppc64le-debug.config visits
configs/generic/powerpc twice. Stop doing that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
This can still be seen in current master.
I should probably
Hi Jiri,
On 4/2/19 6:35 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hi,
please consider attached change that adds libbpf sub
package to be generated within kernel-tools spec.
We need libbpf in a separate package, starting with basic
files, some more might come later if there's a need.
thanks,
jirka
---
I've
On 3/19/19 5:38 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
The patch that added the Kconfig symbol SUN50I_A64_UNSTABLE_TIMER was
dropped in commit 60a8ce36abae7 ("Raspberry Pi DT updates, Update
AllWinner A64 timer errata workaround"). So it's safe to drop it from
the configuration generation system too.
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:56:56PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> CROS_EC_DEBUGFS should be CONFIG_CROS_EC_DEBUGFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
> ---
> configs/fedora/generic/x86/x86_64/CONFIG_CROS_EC_DEBUGFS | 2 +-
> kernel-x86_64-debug.config | 1 -
>
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:53:21PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> CONFIG_STACKINIT should be CONFIG_TEST_STACKINIT, even though this typo
> has no effect on the build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
> ---
> .../fedora/generic/{CONFIG_STACKINIT => CONFIG_TEST_STACKINIT}| 0
> 1 file changed,
Hi,
On 3/11/19 12:05 PM, Christoph M. wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 4:51 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:18 PM Justin Forbes
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:34 AM Prarit Bhargava
wrote:
On 3/10/19 5:53 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 9:46 PM
On 3/8/19 3:57 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
The userspace tools were split out into kernel-tools in 2017. Remove a
patch that still touches them.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
Applied, thanks!
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 3/8/19 3:56 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
0001-Correct-warning-with-gcc9.patch | 35 ---
...tomatically-enforce-module-signature.patch | 217 --
efi-Add-EFI_SECURE_BOOT-bit.patch | 43
On 2/25/19 5:40 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 2/25/19 1:42 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hi,
Reading this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage#Triage_Quickstart
Is it possible to get bugzi...@colorremedies.com added to distribution
whenever a bug is set to CC
On 1/24/19 11:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
Adding explicit bzip2 dependency for perf tool. The bzip2
is used in perf archive script command, and without bzip2
command it fails, like:
$ perf archive
tar (child): bzip2: Cannot exec: No such file or directory
tar (child): Error is not
On 11/8/18 10:32 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Justin Forbes schreef op do 08-11-2018 om 09:19 [-0600]:
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> This is not acceptable just yet. We are still building i686 PAE for
>> some releases. When PAE is completely dead and buried, we will drop
>>
uple months.
[0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1160529
--
Jeremy Cline
XMPP: jer...@jcline.org
IRC: jcline
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
Hi folks,
4.19 was released at the beginning of this week so stable Fedora
releases will be rebased in the coming weeks once a couple stable
updates have been released. Fedora 29 will be rebased first, followed
by Fedora 28. It's likely this will happen early in November. Given that
Fedora 27
Hi,
On 08/17/2018 03:27 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Upstream tree has below commits recently:
> commit ea93102f32244e3f45c8b26260be77ed0cc1d16c
> Author: Yannik Sembritzki
> Date: Thu Aug 16 14:05:23 2018 +0100
>
> Fix kexec forbidding kernels signed with keys in the secondary
On 06/19/2018 03:57 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19-06-18 18:45, Jeremy Cline wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06/19/2018 09:02 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> TL;DR: kernel is still to
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
