** Also affects: v4l2loopback (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: v4l2loopback (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- Call trace from __video_do_ioctl
+ Call trace from __video_do_ioctl on focal
--
A few questions:
- Could you please provide the output of the apt-get purge call?
- If update-initramfs is called in it, could you please manually call it with
the verbose flag (-v) and attach the output?
- Does this only happen on the half-configured scenario?
I'm moving the status to
SRU as a merge proposal for both this and bug 1667512 available at
Bionic:
https://code.launchpad.net/~tdaitx/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+git/initramfs-tools/+merge/355189
Xenial:
https://code.launchpad.net/~tdaitx/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+git/initramfs-tools/+merge/355190
** No
attaching bionic sru patch
** Patch added: "initramfs-tools_0.130ubuntu3.3_debdiff_0.130ubuntu3.4.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1791959/+attachment/5187983/+files/initramfs-tools_0.130ubuntu3.3_debdiff_0.130ubuntu3.4.patch
** Tags added: bionic
--
You received
attaching cosmic patch
** Patch added: "initramfs-tools_0.131ubuntu10_debdiff_0.131ubuntu11.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1791959/+attachment/5187984/+files/initramfs-tools_0.131ubuntu10_debdiff_0.131ubuntu11.patch
--
You received this bug notification because
attaching xenial sru patch
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If a dkms package is installed which has REMAKE_INITRD or the same setting
has been manually configured by a user then when a kernel is removed its
possible for an ".old-dkms" file to be left in /boot with no associated kernel.
** Summary changed:
- remove /boot/initrd.img-*.old-dkms files left behind
+ [SRU] remove orphaned initrd old-dkms files in /boot
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If a dkms package is installed which has REMAKE_INITRD or the same setting
has been manually configured by a user then when a
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Invalid
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If a dkms package is installed which has REMAKE_INITRD or the same setting
has been manually configured by a user then when a
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791959
Title:
remove /boot/initrd.img-*.old-dkms files left behind
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If a dkms package is installed which has REMAKE_INITRD or the same setting
has be manually configured by a user then when a kernel is removed its possible
for an ".old-dkms" file to be left in /boot with no associated kernel.
bug 1515513 dealt with
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
If a dkms package is installed which has REMAKE_INITRD or the same setting has
be manually configured by a user then when a kernel is removed its possible for
an ".old-dkms" file to be left in /boot with no associated kernel.
bug 1515513 dealt with removing
IcedTea 2.6.14 has backported a fix for the exec guard issue and will be
available in Trusty's openjdk-7 version 7u181-2.6.14-0ubuntu0.1.
The fix for OpenJDK-8 will be included in the next security update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which
Regarding OpenJDK 8, it crashes as soon as Xss is set to (or higher
than) 1141K in a i386 JVM (32-bit).
I used the example code from bug #1700270. Please note that there is no
need to even use the java class: the program will segfault while
starting the JVM, so do remove lines 30-34 from either
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Joseph Salisbury
wrote:
> Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer
> to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
> v4.13 kernel[0].
>
> If this bug is fixed in the mainline
FYI I was using 4.10.0-26 for the past days before the 400+ packages
upgrade in artful. I am using snapper to get periodic system snapshots
(pre/post apt install|remove and also hourly/daily/weekly).
The actual behavior was that a short time after boot the btrfs
cleaner/transaction process got
Public bug reported:
After doing no updates for a while I did a big update after the archive
transitions.
On the first boot I got btrfs-cleaner stuck at 100% CPU, sometimes
changing place with btrfs-transaction. Atop does not report a high IO
usage, only high CPU. The computer gets super slow
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619446
Title:
mismatching headers between powerpc/ppc64el and other
Public bug reported:
the header files from linux-libc-dev are causing repsnapper on -proposed
to FTBFS on powerpc/ppc64el
I tracked it to 2 include clauses:
#include
#include
causing the following error on powerpc/ppc64el builds:
following errors:
src/printer/custom_baud.cpp: In function
This patch also fixes LP: #1501566 and LP: #1496924.
** Patch added: "squid3_3.3.8-1ubuntu16.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1496223/+attachment/4489239/+files/squid3_3.3.8-1ubuntu16.debdiff
** Patch removed: "fixes for this bug as well as LP: #1501566 and LP:
libecap3 was been deleted. I have created LP: #1504200 to handle the
gcc5 transition. After it gets sponsored it should be ok to apply the
squid debdiff.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
I agree that merging the new one is the best approach and rbasak was
already working in it, for this reason I was withholding my patches (at
the time they required -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 since I didn't have a
libecap2 compiled for gcc5).
I decided to publish my patches for 3.3.8 just in case
** Patch added: "fixes for this bug as well as LP: #1501566 and LP: #1496924"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/squid/+bug/1496223/+attachment/4480476/+files/squid3_3.3.8-1ubuntu16.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to
The squid3_3.3.8-1ubuntu16.debdiff patch requires gcc5 transition of
libecap2. I kept the lib soname and added a Conflicts: as per
https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPractices
libecap2 and squid3 have been build at
** Project changed: linux => squid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1496223
Title:
squid3 FTBFS due to linux-libc-dev and libc6-dev headers mismatch
Status in Squid:
** Bug watch added: Squid Bugzilla #4323
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4323
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4323
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
27 matches
Mail list logo