[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-11-09 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Tags removed: sts-sru -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-20 Thread Louis Bouchard
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-13 Thread scotte
Thanks Eric, we will remove our local workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-13 Thread Eric Desrochers
Hi scotte, The fix is now released as shown in comment#25 & #26 Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package zfs-linux - 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu14 --- zfs-linux (0.6.5.6-0ubuntu14) xenial; urgency=medium * Fix zfs services to fail on first boot due to zfs services starting up before /etc/mtab has a chance to be symlinked to /proc/mounts. (LP: #1607920)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
Thanks scotte for the feedbacks. ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-06 Thread scotte
I tested again with xenial-proposed and confirmed that everything looks good as far as systemd no longer failing ZFS units due to no /etc/mtab. ii libzfs2linux 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu14 amd64 Native OpenZFS filesystem library for Linux ii zfs-dkms

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Hello Dave, or anyone else affected, Accepted zfs-linux into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs- linux/0.6.5.6-0ubuntu14 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Eric Desrochers
@apw With regard to the translation The commit has been intensively tested in different scenarios/env/... and of course with the "ZFS Test Suite"[1] which include functionality, perf, and stress tests. All the tests were reported as successful. I hope this answer your questions and

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Eric Desrochers
@apw To answer your question: "Also as you are changing MNTTAB is there any reason not to be using that here?" The "reading" is redirected to /proc/self/mounts and the "writing" to /etc/mtab, but if it doesn't exist, that's fine. ZFS just won't update /etc/mtab. Ideally, ZFS should be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Richard Laager
Does ZFS actually have any translations? There are no .po files in the source and no .mo files in the binary package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@Eric -- I am concerned about the effect of some of these changes on translations. For example the below will make the format string a new translatable and therefore will not be translated for non english locales. If we simply replaces MNTTAB with "/etc/mtab" the translatable string would be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-03 Thread Eric Desrochers
As per irc conversation with apw, I'm merging both LPs #1607920 & #1628279 into one debdiff. ** Patch added: "lp1607920_lp1628279_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1607920/+attachment/4753590/+files/lp1607920_lp1628279_xenial.debdiff -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package zfs-linux - 0.6.5.8-0ubuntu3 --- zfs-linux (0.6.5.8-0ubuntu3) yakkety; urgency=medium [ Eric Desrochers ] * Fix zfs services to fail on first boot due to zfs services starting up before /etc/mtab has a chance to be symlinked to /proc/mounts.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-29 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact]  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image.  * Output from systemd - sudo systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION ● zfs-import-scan.service loaded failed failed Import ZFS pools by device

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
I pulled the source code per version and rebase my debdiff on top of "0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13". Will attach the new debdiff in a couple of minutes. Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Rebased debdiff for Xenial (16.04 LTS) ** Patch added: "xenial_debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1607920/+attachment/4750372/+files/lp_1607920_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
I removed the Xenial debdiff attached to this bug and I will re-do it when current zfs-linux SRU for Xenial by cking will be completed. Until then, the Yakkety debdiff is still fine and can be sponsored. Eric ** Patch removed: "lp1607920_xenial.debdiff"

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
@scotte, After some verification, I found out that cking uploaded a patch on Sept 26 on Xenial for another zfs-linux bug[1] using version "0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13", which interfere with my debdiff. "pull-lp-source" and "rmadison" didn't shown the existence of "0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13". I found it by

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Debian bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839071 ** Description changed: [Impact]  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image.  * Output from systemd - sudo systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION ●

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Chris J Arges
** Also affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
debdiff for devel release : Yakkety (16.10) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Medium **

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
debdiff for Xenial (16.04 LTS) ** Description changed: [Impact]  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image.  * Output from systemd - sudo systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION ● zfs-import-scan.service loaded failed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-27 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact]  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image.  * Output from systemd - sudo systemctl --failed UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION ● zfs-import-scan.service loaded failed failed Import ZFS pools by device

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-27 Thread Eric Desrochers
Thanks scotte for the feedbacks, I will now start the SRU process. Eric ** Description changed: [Impact] - * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the +  * zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image. - * Output from

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-27 Thread scotte
I tested this using my reproduction method in AWS EC2 with a test package/PPA provided by Eric@Ubuntu (slashd) containing the commit referenced in comment #6. All looks good now - systemd units for ZFS no longer fail. Thanks for moving this along! -- You received this bug notification because

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-26 Thread Richard Laager
The fix was merged upstream here: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/792517389fad5c495a2738b61c2e9c65dedaaa9a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-20 Thread Eric Desrochers
I jointly worked with the zfsonlinux maintainer on a patch that will be merged in 0.7.0 milestone https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/milestone/11?closed=1 #4680, has been tackled in two parts. the first part (patch that will be merge in 0.7.0), change from /etc/mtab to /proc/self/mounts, and keep

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-13 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Confirmed. /etc/mtab is dead, dead, dead, and an ill-conceived and broken concept. Don't ever use it please ☺ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
chiluk is looking to work on this for upstream. I might jump in too. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680 ** Bug watch added: Github Issue Tracker for ZFS #4680 https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-29 Thread Steve Langasek
No reason to fix this via sysvinit, which should be considered deprecated at this point. ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-29 Thread Dave Chiluk
Personally I think we should modify MNTTAB in zfs-linux to point to /proc/self/mounts. This may not be completely straightforward *(there are a number of places that point to /etc/mnttab directly, or have logic around it and /proc/mounts), but it should be doable. I like this solution most