This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before
2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.33 regressions, please let us
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
Another one for you:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/30834
This has no Bugzilla entry; should I submit one?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
On 07/23/2010 01:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
On 07/23/2010 02:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed
On 07/23/2010 06:33 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from
Still continues. I can however hibernate and resume from hibernation ok.
- Original Message
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@...
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-ker...@...
Cc: Kernel Testers List kernel-test...@...; Maciej Rutecki
maciej.rute...@...; Shawn Starr shawn.st...@...
Sent:
On Friday, July 23, 2010 06:15:50 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
On 07/23/2010 06:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
Bug-Entry :
On 13:47 Fri 23 Jul , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Shawn Starr shawn.st...@rogers.com wrote:
Still continues. I can however hibernate and resume from hibernation ok.
If it works on Fedora, maybe you could get it working with a similar
upstream kernel (same version, same config) and then bisect?
--
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:15:52 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:15:55 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:33:36 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
[...]
I think this may actually be an X server bug. 2.6.34 introduced some
Hi,
that seems to be not a kernel issue indeed, as at some point I never
got this hang again. However, I upgraded to new versions of Mesa, DRM,
and also new
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:50:56 +0200
Tino Keitel tino.kei...@tikei.de wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:33:36 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
[...]
I think this may actually be an X server bug. 2.6.34 introduced some
Hi,
that seems to be not a kernel issue indeed, as at some point I never
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:41:43AM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
I actually haven't been able to reproduce with kernels since a couple
weeks ago (still reproducible if I go back to 2.6.35-rc3, though).
Seems to be fixed somehow, can anyone else confirm?
I'll try to reproduce it over the weekend.
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Thomas Meyer wrote:
Am Freitag, den 23.07.2010, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Friday, July 23, 2010 06:15:50 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
On 07/23/2010 02:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:15:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of
On Friday, July 23, 2010, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
On 07/23/2010 01:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please
On Friday, July 23, 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16372
Subject : Regression 2.6.34-2.6.35-rc4: radeaon KMS an RS690 broken
Submitter : Torsten Kaiser just.for.l...@googlemail.com
Date :
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 14:47, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed
82 matches
Mail list logo
