bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de
Date: 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
Message-ID : 20100714135217.ga1
. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de
Date
://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de
Date: 2010-07-14 13:52 (19 days old)
Message-ID : 20100714135217.ga1...@arch.tripp.de
References : http://marc.info/?l
://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de
Date: 2010-07-14 13:52 (10 days old)
Message-ID : 20100714135217.ga1...@arch.tripp.de
References : http://marc.info/?l
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed
On 07/23/2010 06:33 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from
