On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 3:28 PM Greg KH wrote:
> And maybe there are no x86-specific bugs at the moment?
Yes, I think so.
>Try running linux-next and see if you have any issues with any subsystem, if
>so, try
> working on that.
Sure, I will try it next.
Regards,
Dileep
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 03:23:13PM +0530, Dileep Sankhla wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:33 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > What do you mean by "first bug"? Why does the location in an
> > arbitrary list matter?
>
> Hello Greg,
>
> >From "first bug" I meant the initial bug for me to solve under this
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:33 PM Greg KH wrote:
> What do you mean by "first bug"? Why does the location in an
> arbitrary list matter?
Hello Greg,
From "first bug" I meant the initial bug for me to solve under this subsystem.
> Also, bugzilla is not used by many kernel subsystems, so perhaps
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:12:57AM +0530, Dileep Sankhla wrote:
> Last night, I dedicated time to go through bugs on Bugzilla (see [1]),
> considering their priorities but I could not figure out which one to
> pick. While I found only a couple of bugs with the latest modification
> date, I lack
Hello,
I am new to Linux kernel development and have a keen interest in the
x86 architecture subsystem, particularly in the areas of boot and
feature flags. Before diving into adding or changing features, I would
like to address a few existing bugs. I am good in C and have some
knowledge of
