Re: [PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation

2021-09-29 Thread Pasha Tatashin
> FWIW, I'm fine with this series. I think the only concern raised by > James and not addressed is the possibility of the failure of the memory > allocation for copying the page tables during kexec. If anyone will > complain in the future, we can look into adding a fallback mechanism to > do the

Re: [PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation

2021-09-29 Thread Pasha Tatashin
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:49 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 07:13:10PM -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > > Changelog: > > v17: > > - Merged with 5.15-rc1 as requested by Catalin Marinas > > - Added Tested-by: Pingfan Liu > > This looks pretty good to me. I've left

Re: [PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation

2021-09-29 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 07:13:10PM -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > Pasha Tatashin (15): > arm64: kernel: add helper for booted at EL2 and not VHE > arm64: trans_pgd: hibernate: Add trans_pgd_copy_el2_vectors > arm64: hibernate: abstract ttrb0 setup function > arm64: kexec: flush image and

Re: [PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation

2021-09-29 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 07:13:10PM -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > Changelog: > v17: > - Merged with 5.15-rc1 as requested by Catalin Marinas > - Added Tested-by: Pingfan Liu This looks pretty good to me. I've left some minor comments on a few of the patches, but other than those I'd

[PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation

2021-09-16 Thread Pasha Tatashin
Changelog: v17: - Merged with 5.15-rc1 as requested by Catalin Marinas - Added Tested-by: Pingfan Liu v16: - Merged with 5.14-rc4 v15: - Changed trans_pgd_copy_el2_vectors() to use vector table that only shared by kexec and hibernate. This way sync does