I think JP ran into this earlier, so he might know more about it.
Another issue might be that at the end of the tool loop the event will get
skipped which will send it to wxWidgets for processing (at which point it will
probably come back as a hotkey again). We might already have logic to deal
In the tool dispatcher currently, if any action is associated with a key
combination (even if the action is not handled by any active tools) then a
key event with that combination will not progress further than the
dispatchHotKey function in the dispatcher. For instance, this means that
the letter
Whoops, ignore the patch in the last email since it appears a log statement
slipped out of an if null check. Here is an updated patch.
-Ian
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 5:30 PM Ian McInerney
wrote:
> As I was working on the cvpcb actions, I needed to trace the tool dispatch
> routes through the
As I was working on the cvpcb actions, I needed to trace the tool dispatch
routes through the stack, so I went ahead and added a new debug trace for
monitoring the dispatch events. It is contained in the attached patch. I
don't guarantee that I found every location they pass through, but I got
the
Thanks, JP. I've created https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1838140.
Cheers,
Diego
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 at 15:03, jp charras wrote:
> Le 27/07/2019 à 14:35, Diego Herranz a écrit :
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I'm using nightlies and facing a weird bug with buses. I was wondering
> > whether it can
I just looked and it appears that this got removed. I guess we will
have to add FR_SEARCH_REGEX to the FIND_REPLACE_FLAGS enum in
include/base_struct.h and then add a wxRegex search to
EDA_ITEM::Matches() to provide regular expression searching.
On 7/26/19 5:21 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Oh cool.
Hi, all.
I'm using nightlies and facing a weird bug with buses. I was wondering
whether it can be related to these bus upgrades.
I've got a bus:
ROW0, ROW1, ROW2, ROW3, ROW4, ROW5, ROW6, ROW7, which on the PCB layout
becomes
ROW0, ROW0, ROW0, ROW0, ROW0, ROW0, ROW0, ROW7 ???
It seems to be
That looks quite like the "Edit Symbol Fields" dialog. I would suggest
to extend this one instead of creating your own one.
What I would like to see is an advanced search for components, having at
least the filter features of cvpcb. This would allow ditching the
redundant dialogs for symbol and
I've been testing this dialog and I think it is a nice addition. Thanks!
There seems to be something wrong with the area calculation, though. See
image below:
[image: area.png]
Thanks,
Diego
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 11:18, Ian McInerney
wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> Instead of declaring the 2 static
Also as an example of possible U.I. for search, including common, simple
and advanced options.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCMddxkKe8k
(starting around 0:18 of the video).
Cheers,
Dino.
On 26/07/19 23:21, Jeff Young wrote:
Oh cool. I’ll look into it….
On 26 Jul 2019, at 14:57,
10 matches
Mail list logo
