On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:27:51AM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
My branch of the Gelato Federation (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/)
wants to invest time and effort into IA64 KVM which could mean helping
with a merge, streamlining code, benchmarking, bug hunting or
something else along those
Amit Shah wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2007 12:22:39 Alexey Eremenko wrote:
This is strange, because I have XP on AMD-64 working fine on KVM-51.
A pre-installed VM works just fine. The problem is with the installation.
Does
the installation succeed for you as well with kvm-51?
On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:12:41 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
Hey folks,
Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series.
We didn't get that many comments from the last time,
so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya!
From the last version, the most notable changes are:
david ahern wrote:
The patch worked for me -- rhel4 smp guests boot fine on stock RHEL5 hosts,
both 32-bit and 64-bit.
Excellent. I had a premonition so it is already committed.
Do note that smp_call_function_mask() emulation is pretty bad in terms
of performance on large multicores.
On Monday 12 November 2007 13:42:07 Avi Kivity wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2007 12:22:39 Alexey Eremenko wrote:
This is strange, because I have XP on AMD-64 working fine on KVM-51.
A pre-installed VM works just fine. The problem is with the installation.
Does the
Farkas Levente wrote:
Guest is clean FC6 x86_64
can you recheck it with 1 clean centos-5 x86_64 and one centos-5 i386
both have 2GB ram and in your case 2 vcpu and try to start the guest
parallel?
if it's still works for you then the only difference will be the
hardware or that i
On Sunday 11 November 2007 22:16:50 Ghiora Drori wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in supporting NVDIA, ATI, Intel and presumably other
display cards when running a windows guest KVM. The idea is to get
Windows XP games to work properly under kvm when being hosted by Linux.
The screen on Linux can
Caleb Moore wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 18:46 +0200, Ghiora Drori wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in supporting NVDIA, ATI, Intel and presumably other
display cards when running a windows guest KVM. The idea is to get
Windows XP games to work properly under kvm when being hosted by
Linux.
The
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
4. Error Fault when IDT_Vectoring while running 64bit UP vista and smp
64bit windows guests
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1816460group_id=180599atid=893831
This should be fixed now. I reverted the patches that introduced it and
Jerone Young wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Date 1194560092 21600
# Node ID 10991ad11487e51d327430a1a61e0d63021caf7b
# Parent 026c26ab068482aaf17deaf8cd73c1ff1db3806b
[v2] Fix declerations that should be in kvm-common.h not in kvm-x86.h
The last
Avi Kivity wrote:
For the present discussion, I agree, but in general we should be
prepared to accept some no-op callouts.
Oh sure, I don't mind those. We'll have plenty of them, where other
architectures will need to take action and s390 won't. It's just that
in the current location, the
Yes, it has been fixed already.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2007年11月12日 16:28
To: Zhao, Yunfeng
Cc: kvm-devel
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] KVM Test result, kernel a798c61.. , userspace
5d6ea6b..
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
4. Error Fault when IDT_Vectoring
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
The following patch applies to kvm-51 and correct all compilation warnings
because of mismatching types for ram related variables and that were left
behind after the changes to add support for more than 2GB of memory for 32bit
guests.
Please use correct
Carsten Otte wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
For the present discussion, I agree, but in general we should be
prepared to accept some no-op callouts.
Oh sure, I don't mind those. We'll have plenty of them, where other
architectures will need to take action and s390 won't. It's just that
Linus,
Please pull the tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git for-linus
Containing some fairly critical fixes for 2.6.24's KVM, including hard host
hangs on AMD.
Avi Kivity (5):
KVM: x86 emulator: fix 'push imm8' emulation
KVM: SVM: Fix SMP with kernel
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
A guest can call dma_ops-is_pv_device() to find out if a device is
a passthrough'ed device (device passed on to a guest by the
host). If this is true, a hypercall will be made to translate DMA
mapping operations.
Doesn't really
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:06PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
Of all the DMA calls, only dma_alloc_coherent might not actually
call dma_ops-alloc_coherent. We make sure that gets called if the
device that's being worked on is a PV device
I always thougt that's a mess... the reason it's done this
On Monday 12 November 2007 16:20:01 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
We make the dma_mapping_ops structure to point to our structure so
that every DMA access goes through us. (This is the reason this only
works for 64-bit guest. 32-bit guest
On Monday 12 November 2007 16:26:37 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:06PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
Of all the DMA calls, only dma_alloc_coherent might not actually
call dma_ops-alloc_coherent. We make sure that gets called if the
device that's being worked on is a PV
Small fixes and updates.
Changes from kvm-51:
- fix efer reload host crash on T2600 and similar processors
- revert sleepy interrupt injection
- fixes Fault when IDT_Vectoring
- atomically inject real-mode interrupts
- wbinvd exiting on newer Intel processors (Eddie Dong)
- fixes real-time
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
In general I think we need to add another feature or even version
number ( I know you guys hate it).
The reason is - Let's say you dont change functionality but change
the irq protocol (for example the isr won't be zeroed on read), then
an old
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:26:24PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2007 16:20:01 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
We make the dma_mapping_ops structure to point to our structure so
that every DMA access goes through us. (This
On Monday 12 November 2007 19:02:07 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:26:24PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2007 16:20:01 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
We make the dma_mapping_ops structure to point to
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:25:27PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
Selectively? What happens in the case when some iommu doesn't want
to invoke the prev_op, but the mapping depends on it being called
(eg, the hypercalling op is embedded somewhere in the prev_op chain)
Bad things :-)
There needs to be
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
We make the dma_mapping_ops structure to point to our structure so
that every DMA access goes through us. (This is the reason this only
works for 64-bit guest. 32-bit guest doesn't yet have a dma_ops
struct.)
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:20:36PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch implements a very naive virtio block device backend in QEMU.
There's a lot of room for future optimization. We need to merge a -disk patch
before we can provide a mechanism to expose this to users.
The latest
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:20:36PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch implements a very naive virtio block device backend in QEMU.
There's a lot of room for future optimization. We need to merge a -disk
patch
before we can provide a mechanism to expose
Hi Levente !
The only idea that I have for you is to: Try to run KVM on newer kernel.
(2.6.21+)
I did all of what you said on Fedora 7/x64 host (2.6.21 default kernel) and it
all worked ! (except Mandrake 9.0, which I don't have)
-Alexey
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Hi Levente !
The only idea that I have for you is to: Try to run KVM on newer kernel.
(2.6.21+)
I did all of what you said on Fedora 7/x64 host (2.6.21 default kernel)
and it all worked ! (except Mandrake 9.0, which I don't have)
that's exactly which i'm not really
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:02PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
@@ -1649,6 +1913,15 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
switch (nr) {
+ case KVM_PV_DMA_MAP:
+ ret = pv_map_hypercall(vcpu, a0, a1);
+ break;
+ case KVM_PV_DMA_UNMAP:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:50:01PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
We make the dma_mapping_ops structure to point to our structure so
that every DMA access goes through us. (This is the reason this only
works for 64-bit guest.
I'm able to install Windows vista 32 bit ok, however when I try to activate
online, it seems to start the process ok but then fails with the following
error.
A problem occurred when Windows tried to activate. Error code 0x80072F78
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Haydn
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 16:48 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Hi Levente !
The only idea that I have for you is to: Try to run KVM on newer kernel.
(2.6.21+)
I did all of what you said on Fedora 7/x64 host (2.6.21 default kernel)
and it all worked ! (except
Izik Eidus wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 16:29 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Small fixes and updates.
Changes from kvm-51:
- fix efer reload host crash on T2600 and similar processors
- revert sleepy interrupt injection
- fixes Fault when IDT_Vectoring
- atomically
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 11:04 -0500, Haydn Solomon wrote:
I'm able to install Windows vista 32 bit ok, however when I try to
activate online, it seems to start the process ok but then fails with
the following error.
A problem occurred when Windows tried to activate. Error code
0x80072F78
When that switch I get BSOD on boot.
On Nov 12, 2007 10:58 AM, Izik Eidus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 11:04 -0500, Haydn Solomon wrote:
I'm able to install Windows vista 32 bit ok, however when I try to
activate online, it seems to start the process ok but then fails
Do you have Internet Connectivity?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931276 hints at no Internet connection.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Haydn
Solomon
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 6:04 PM
To: kvm-devel
Subject: [kvm-devel] Activating Windows Vista with KVM
On Monday 12 November 2007 21:25:22 Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:21:02PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
@@ -1649,6 +1913,15 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
switch (nr) {
+ case KVM_PV_DMA_MAP:
+ ret = pv_map_hypercall(vcpu, a0, a1);
# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Date 1194887893 21600
# Node ID 41925cedf395c050fb31083eeda8a08bad609169
# Parent a40de75e2bf823c092a20009c7646bf4c026a260
Make kvm_run more arch friendly
This patch creates hook kvm_arch_run in kvm_run function. This
is to handle
Farkas Levente wrote:
first of all fully update your centos (a bit newer kernel), then i use
these packages:
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/
use libvirtd and virt-manager too and start the guests from there. and
start them manually paralell (i used to reboot the host
Haydn Solomon wrote:
I'm able to install Windows vista 32 bit ok, however when I try to
activate online, it seems to start the process ok but then fails with
the following error.
A problem occurred when Windows tried to activate. Error code
0x80072F78
Any help would be appreciated.
I can't seem to get to the nightly snapshot url:
http://people.qumranet.com:/avi/snapshots/
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reverting to release 51 seems to have solved my problems.
On Nov 12, 2007 2:30 PM, Haydn Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure what happened but now I'm getting messages like the following
when running my guest windows XP ACPI HAL. This is the first time I'm seeing
this type of error.
david ahern wrote:
Can you post the full qemu command that gets launched in each case?
this is the current running one, the only difference when smp set is -smp 4:
root 3270 10.3 25.8 2213976 2111868 ? Sl 16:20 30:35
/usr/bin/qemu-kvm -M pc -m 2048 -smp 1 -monitor pty -boot c -hda
Avi Kivity wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
first of all fully update your centos (a bit newer kernel), then i use
these packages:
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/
use libvirtd and virt-manager too and start the guests from there. and
start them manually paralell (i used to
One of my hosts is a DL380 G5 (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5140 @ 2.33GHz) with 4GB of
RAM. At this time it is running the stock i386 version of RHEL5.1. I am
building kvm from the tar balls, currently using kvm-52.
I have a stock RHEL5 guest (2.6.18-8.el5 kernel) and no added kernel boot
options.
Haydn Solomon wrote:
Not sure what happened but now I'm getting messages like the following
when running my guest windows XP ACPI HAL. This is the first time I'm
seeing this type of error. The only thing I did today was upgrade to
kvm release 52. The only thing I did prior to seeing this
-- Forwarded message --
From: Haydn Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 12, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Error messages
To: Izik Eidus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah.. it was repeating and sometimes would hang the host. This continuted
to happen even after rebooting the host a
before the patch, can you test this userspace (kvm-52) with the kvm
module from kvm-51 and report if you have this issue?
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Haydn Solomon* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 12, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Error
david ahern wrote:
One of my hosts is a DL380 G5 (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5140 @ 2.33GHz) with 4GB
of RAM. At this time it is running the stock i386 version of RHEL5.1. I am
building kvm from the tar balls, currently using kvm-52.
I have a stock RHEL5 guest (2.6.18-8.el5 kernel) and no added
On Nov 12, 2007 3:52 PM, Izik Eidus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
before the patch, can you test this userspace (kvm-52) with the kvm
module from kvm-51 and report if you have this issue?
OK, ran userspace 52 against module 51 and so far I haven't been able to
reproduce the problem. I was able to
With kvm-52 my 32-bit host running RHEL5.1 can start an RHEL 5 SMP guest only
once. Second and subsequent attempts hang. Removing kvm and kvm_intel modules
have no affect; I need to reboot the host to get an SMP guest to start. My
similarly configured 64-bit host does not seem to have this
(Changed the subject to correspond with email.)
I am having the same problem on the 64-bit host running RHEL5.1 as well, it
just takes more reboots. Same symptoms as I mentioned for the 32-bit host.
kernel side stack traces for each qemu thread for one of the lockups is
attached; the file
Avi Kivity wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:20:36PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch implements a very naive virtio block device backend in QEMU.
There's a lot of room for future optimization. We need to merge a
-disk patch
before we can provide a
Dor Laor wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
In general I think we need to add another feature or even version
number ( I know you guys hate it).
The reason is - Let's say you dont change functionality but change
the irq protocol (for example the isr won't be zeroed on read),
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:25:54 Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
In general I think we need to add another feature or even version
number ( I know you guys hate it).
The reason is - Let's say you dont change functionality but change
Dear,
We released new VMKNOPPIX for x86/x86_64.
http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/vmknoppix/index-en.html
VMKNOPPIX-CD for x86(20071101)
VMKNOPPIX-CD for x86_64 (20071107)
This version includes Xen3.1.1, KVM48, x86_64 kernel with IA32 emulator, etc.
The included software is
Hi,
Looks like I will have to do some reading about what has been posted so far.
Thanks Ghiora
On Nov 12, 2007 10:27 AM, Dor Laor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caleb Moore wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 18:46 +0200, Ghiora Drori wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in supporting NVDIA, ATI, Intel and
fix sparse warnings Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/kvm/kvm.h |2 +-
drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |3 ++-
drivers/kvm/lapic.c|2 +-
drivers/kvm/svm.c |2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+static void kvm_write_guest_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{
+ struct timespec ts;
+ int r;
+
+ if (!vcpu-clock_gpa)
+ return;
+
+ /* Updates version to the next odd number, indicating
we're writing */
+ vcpu-hv_clock.version++;
+
log.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Hi Avi,
smp_call_function_mask is introduced in latest commits, but not
defined in UP configuration. So, it will run into compile fail when
kernel is configured without smp support. Please check and do the fix
:)
Best Wishes!
Xiantao
Ryan Harper wrote:
I can't seem to get to the nightly snapshot url:
http://people.qumranet.com:/avi/snapshots/
i just checked it and it worked...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping
63 matches
Mail list logo
