On Nov 21, 2007 8:56 AM, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marko Kohtala wrote:
Wait for right amount of tlb flushes. Completed can be larger than
needed and therefore the loop waiting them to match never ends.
Signed-off-by: Marko Kohtala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This solves
Marko Kohtala wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 8:56 AM, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marko Kohtala wrote:
Wait for right amount of tlb flushes. Completed can be larger than
needed and therefore the loop waiting them to match never ends.
Signed-off-by: Marko Kohtala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
These patches are based on Xiantao's work to create struct kvm_x86. Patch 1
replaces his KVM Portability split: Splitting kvm structure (V2), and
patches 2 and 3 build on it.
Looks like a clean approach with to to_kvm_x86 macro. Whole series:
Acked-by: Carsten Otte
* Avi Kivity wrote:
Carsten Otte wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
These patches are based on Xiantao's work to create struct kvm_x86.
Patch 1 replaces his KVM Portability split: Splitting kvm structure
(V2), and patches 2 and 3 build on it.
Looks like a clean approach with to to_kvm_x86
Avi Kivity wrote:
Carsten Otte wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
These patches are based on Xiantao's work to create struct kvm_x86.
Patch 1 replaces his KVM Portability split: Splitting kvm
structure (V2), and patches 2 and 3 build on it.
Looks like a clean approach with to to_kvm_x86
These patches expose host CPU features (that are known to work under
KVM) to guests. It makes a couple of benchmarks run faster, and
generally gives kvm's user better info on its host.
The kernel-space patch adds KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl to obtain the
table of cpuid functions supported by
* Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
These patches expose host CPU features (that are known to work under
KVM) to guests. It makes a couple of benchmarks run faster, and
generally gives kvm's user better info on its host.
The kernel-space patch adds KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl to obtain the
table of
hi,
we made a quick try of kvm-53. in short there is no progress for us
(since we need the mandrake-9 i586 guest too) so switch back to kvm-36.
in detail:
- guest-1 smp guest are hang at starting udev
- guest-1 sinlge cpu boot.
- guest-2 both smp and single cpu guest boot.
- guest-3 neither smp
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
we made a quick try of kvm-53. in short there is no progress for us
(since we need the mandrake-9 i586 guest too) so switch back to kvm-36.
in detail:
- guest-1 smp guest are hang at starting udev
i am in search for this bug
it worked for you in kvm-36?
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
These patches expose host CPU features (that are known to work under
KVM) to guests. It makes a couple of benchmarks run faster, and
generally gives kvm's user better info on its host.
The kernel-space patch adds KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl to obtain the
table of
Izik Eidus wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
we made a quick try of kvm-53. in short there is no progress for us
(since we need the mandrake-9 i586 guest too) so switch back to kvm-36.
in detail:
- guest-1 smp guest are hang at starting udev
i am in search for this bug
it worked for you in
Hi Levente!
Do you have a link where I can download Mandrake 9.0 ?
Because I don't have this version, and don't know where to get it.
-Alexey
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges.
I have an AMD 4800+ machine with 2 GIG RAM.
I have OLD machines that I want to virtualize and then TURN OFF.
The old machines are redhat 7.3, redhat 9, centos 4 i386. I am using
centos 5 x86_64.
I need to have the OLD machines migrated to the virtual image.
What is the BEST way to do that???
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Hi Levente!
Do you have a link where I can download Mandrake 9.0 ?
Because I don't have this version, and don't know where to get it.
ok. just to describe why we need it. our production servers run on
mandrake-9 and mandrake-10. it's about 6-700 server running in
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:52:15PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
These patches expose host CPU features (that are known to work under
KVM) to guests. It makes a couple of benchmarks run faster, and
generally gives kvm's user better info on its host.
The kernel-space patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an AMD 4800+ machine with 2 GIG RAM.
I have OLD machines that I want to virtualize and then TURN OFF.
The old machines are redhat 7.3, redhat 9, centos 4 i386. I am using
centos 5 x86_64.
Migrating a physical machine to a virtual environment needs
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have the old disk and I created a 10GIG image and installed the 7.3, 9
and centos 4.
Now I want to make sure the new image matches the physical image.
I mounted the image as:
mount -t ext3 -o loop,offset=32256 Image.redhat7.3.img /mnt/image
then I executed
tar
Well, Mandrake 9.0 works on Intel/x64 KVM-51, but without SMP.
It stucks with SMP. (on init stage, when entering init 5)
-Alexey
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
OK, I have found that Mandrake Linux 9.0 works on Intel/x86-64 on KVM-51.
Does this help you for now ?
I will try to look further.
-Alexey
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R)
Bugs item #1835911, was opened at 2007-11-21 19:20
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1835911group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
opened a bug report about Mandrake 9.0:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1835911group_id=180599atid=893831
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 09:13 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Where the device is implemented is an implementation detail that should
be hidden from the guest, isn't that one of the strengths of
virtualization? Two examples: a file-based block device implemented in
qemu gives you fancy file
On Nov 21, 2007 11:41 AM, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesc Romà i Frigolé wrote:
Hello,
Sorry if the post is off-topic, but the qemu users forum has been down
for several days.
Is it possible to use a wide screen resolution of 1680x1050 with kvm?
the guest OS is windows
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
OK, I have found that Mandrake Linux 9.0 works on Intel/x86-64 on KVM-51.
Does this help you for now ?
I will try to look further.
try with kvm-53! it do not even start to boot for me (actually i don't
remember for the kvm-51 result but it may be worked with kvm-51).
try with kvm-53! it do not even start to boot for me (actually i don't
remember for the kvm-51 result but it may be worked with kvm-51).
Tried, and you're right. It crashes right from start.
Opened a bug report. We will look into this issue.
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
As kernel I use Linux 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 22:09:15 GMT
2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux.
I have 3 different vms running. At the
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
As kernel I use Linux 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 22:09:15 GMT
2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux.
I have 3 different
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
As kernel I use Linux 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 22:09:15 GMT
2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux.
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
As kernel I use Linux 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Sun Oct
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
As kernel I
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm)
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm)
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+.
As distribution I use Ubuntu server 7.10.
As kernel I use Linux 2.6.22-14-server #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 22:09:15
GMT 2007 x86_64
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Izik Eidus schrieb:
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with my virtual machines. I am using kvm53
on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2
Hi,
I'm trying to install KVM using the git repos on Scientific Linux. The
error occurs when I run make.
The kvm-53 tarball works fine, but something is getting misconfigured
when I run make -C kernel sync. This error doesn't occur on
Fedora Core. I installed kernel-headers using yum
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:36:31 pm Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
These patches expose host CPU features (that are known to work under
KVM) to guests. It makes a couple of benchmarks run faster, and
generally gives kvm's user better info on its host.
The kernel-space patch adds KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
Sorry to be late on reporting on kvm-53 release but I have had host hang and
BSOD when running windows xp sp2 32-bit guest. I have had to revert to
release 51 as I also have problems with release 52 (boot failure). My host
does have flexpriority and details are as follows:
Linux
38 matches
Mail list logo
