Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 17:09 -0500, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
plain text document attachment (kvm-multicall)
Batch pte updates and tlb flushes in lazy MMU mode.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 schrieb Avi Kivity:
AFAICS there is no guarantee about page-alignment here...
Kernel data is physically contiguous (true for per-cpu data as well?),
so no there's issue here.
Modules are loaded into vmalloc space, no? I think, if kvm is built as
module, static
Bugs item #1895893, was opened at 2008-02-18 10:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1895893group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 schrieb Avi Kivity:
AFAICS there is no guarantee about page-alignment here...
Kernel data is physically contiguous (true for per-cpu data as well?),
so no there's issue here.
Modules are loaded into vmalloc
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:34:09 +0100
Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever the register state becomes consistent with VT again.
vmx_set_segment() looks like the right point for turning it off.
Sounds good. As basically the only problem we have are the sanity
checks done on
On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:34:09 +0100
Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever the register state becomes consistent with VT again.
vmx_set_segment() looks like the right
On Feb 18, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:34:09 +0100
Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever the register state becomes consistent with VT again.
vmx_set_segment() looks like the right point for turning it off.
Sounds good. As basically the
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
Today’s IA32e KVM build fails, here is the error message:
libqemu.a(kvm-tpr-opt.o): In function `enable_vapic':
/workspace/ia32e/nightly/kvm-master-2.6.22-rc4-20080218000132559/kvm-userspace/qemu/kvm-tpr-opt.c:232:
undefined reference to `kvm_enable_vapic'
Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As everything except gfxboot works, we can simply change gfxboot in
runtime to use a different value. Unfortunately the mov instruction,
used to read the SS register is only 2 bytes long, so there is no way to
binary patch the mov to something that
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As everything except gfxboot works, we can simply change gfxboot in
runtime to use a different value. Unfortunately the mov instruction,
used to read the SS register is only 2 bytes long, so there is no
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 03:08:17AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:48:27 +0100 Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 05:51:38AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote:
I am doing this in xpmem with a stack-based structure in the function
calling get_user_pages. That structure describes the start and
end address of the range we are doing the get_user_pages on. If an
invalidate_range_begin comes in
I am using TIP.
I found that if try to compile twice, the first time has no problem but
the second time (make clean./configuremake) will meet the error.
I can't reproduce this with the last snapshot. What commits hashes are
you using?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are
Hey,
I'm still trying to get kvm/qemu to run at 1920x1200x32 widescreen mode
(my tft's resolution). Host is 32bit Gentoo, guest is 32bit Windows XP.
I'm using kvm-60.
Following this post [1], I added the following lines to
kvm-60/vgabios/vbetables-gen.c
{ 1920, 1200, 8 ,
hi there
i've read http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Virtio?highlight=%28virtio%29
about virtio. To test it, i got a new 2.6.25-rc2 kernel and kvm-60
(both on debian).
has anybody out there a minimalistic .config to build a minimal guest
kernel image with virtio enabled?
all my tries with
Thomas Mueller wrote:
hi there
i've read http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Virtio?highlight=%28virtio%29
about virtio. To test it, i got a new 2.6.25-rc2 kernel and kvm-60
(both on debian).
has anybody out there a minimalistic .config to build a minimal guest
kernel image with virtio
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
I am using TIP.
I found that if try to compile twice, the first time has no problem but
the second time (make clean./configuremake) will meet the error.
Yes, 'make clean' was too eager. Fixed.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Bugs item #1896213, was opened at 2008-02-18 17:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1896213group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Hi Anthony
has anybody out there a minimalistic .config to build a minimal guest
kernel image with virtio enabled?
I usually do a make defconfig, enable the CONFIG_VIRTIO_* options in
.config, then do a make oldconfig and answer 'y' to all of the questions.
ok, i'll give it a try.
Bugs item #1896261, was opened at 2008-02-18 18:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1896261group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi Anthony
has anybody out there a minimalistic .config to build a minimal guest
kernel image with virtio enabled?
I usually do a make defconfig, enable the CONFIG_VIRTIO_* options in
.config, then do a make oldconfig and answer 'y' to all of the
Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all!
Earlier it was suggested that we go ahead with emulating Perf Mon Events in
exposing it to the guest. The serious limitation in this approach is that we
end up exposing only a small number of events to the guest, even though the
host hardware
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 10:47 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 08:58 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
It'll need to be built against your kernel tree; please provide a URL.
curl http://penguinppc.org/~hollisb/kvm/kvm-powerpc.mbox | git-am
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Unfortunately I wasn't able to get an F8 ppc rescue cd ISO to boot with
qemu 0.9.0. Can you point me to a working combination?
It's difficult to get anything booting with upstream PowerPC qemu,
mostly because of the unmaintained firmware they use (called Open
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 22:22 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Unfortunately I wasn't able to get an F8 ppc rescue cd ISO to boot with
qemu 0.9.0. Can you point me to a working combination?
It's difficult to get anything booting with upstream PowerPC qemu,
mostly
It seems that we've come up with two reasonable cases where it makes
sense to use these notifiers for InfiniBand/RDMA:
First, the ability to safely to DMA to/from userspace memory with the
memory regions mlock()ed but the pages not pinned. In this case the
notifiers here would seem to suit us
Alexander Graf wrote:
Real mode segments are mere offsets. They get lshifted by 4 (as far as
I remember) and just added to the offset. SS is on some value here
Yes, this is correct.
0x00046e60: and$0x,%esp
0x00046e66: shl$0x4,%eax
0x00046e69:
Please post your command line for launching KVM. Make sure you have a
root parameter like root=/dev/vda1.
the vda1 thing i didn't know. thanks. will also give it a try - tomorrow.
Is virtio block device replacing SATA/SCSI - are the SCSI/SATA
drivers needed on
Please post your command line for launching KVM. Make sure you have a
root parameter like root=/dev/vda1.
the vda1 thing i didn't know. thanks. will also give it a try - tomorrow.
Is virtio block device replacing SATA/SCSI - are the SCSI/SATA
drivers needed on
29 matches
Mail list logo
