Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
Hi,Avi
With latest kvm commits, the SMP linux guests causes host soft lock issues
can not be reproduced on my machine.
Have you fixed it?
Not intentionally...
Maybe the rmap fix is somehow responsible.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are
: [kvm-devel] kvm-45 problems
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
The first two cases have no problem in our
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
This fix cannot resolve this issue.
Against latest kvm commits, SMP linux with 4 vcpus still cannot boot up.
But the issue will not happen , if adding -smp4 -no-acpi.
Can you try the attached patch?
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
This fix cannot resolve this issue.
Against latest kvm commits, SMP linux with 4 vcpus still cannot boot up.
But the issue will not happen , if adding -smp4 -no-acpi.
Can you try the attached patch?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Dong, Eddie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i'm just try kvm-45. for me it still unusable, so switch back
to kvm-36:-(
setup:
- host: centos-5 x86-64 (4 core, 8gb ram)
- guest:
- centos-5 i386 4 cpu, 2gb
- centos-5 x86-64 4 cpu, 1gb
- mandrake-9 i586 2 cpu, 1gb
- winxp 32bit
are using 2.6.9, 2.6.16, and 2.6.23 kernels.
Thanks
Yunfeng
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farkas Levente
Sent: 2007年10月9日 14:45
To: Dong, Eddie
Cc: kvm-devel
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-45 problems
Dong, Eddie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
The first two cases have no problem in our testing.
And booting 4 UP linux guests may
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
The first two cases have no problem in our testing.
And booting 4
Farkas Levente wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
The first two cases have no problem
Avi Kivity wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
The first two
Farkas Levente wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Farkas Levente wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple guest tests in our nightly testing.
Like booting two UP windows guests, booting one UP linux guest and one UP
windows guest, and booting 4 UP linux guests.
The first two cases have no problem in our testing.
And booting
[c0479fad] sys_ioctl+0x48/0x5f
[c0403eff] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2007年10月9日 18:19
To: Zhao, Yunfeng
Cc: kvm-devel
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-45 problems
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
We run some booting multiple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i'm just try kvm-45. for me it still unusable, so switch back
to kvm-36:-(
setup:
- host: centos-5 x86-64 (4 core, 8gb ram)
- guest:
- centos-5 i386 4 cpu, 2gb
- centos-5 x86-64 4 cpu, 1gb
- mandrake-9 i586 2 cpu, 1gb
- winxp 32bit1gb
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
