RE: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
I have read this draft and support its adoption. Please update the terminology to match draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-07 with respect to the use of (C-*,C-*-BIDIR). Thanks --Kurt -Original Message- From: L3VPN [mailto:l3vpn-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:07 AM To: l3vpn@ietf.org Cc: EXT - thomas.mo...@orange.com Subject: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the latter case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until January the 22nd. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication
Re: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
I also support adoption of this draft. -Lenny On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Eric Rosen wrote: -) -) This email starts a two-week poll on adopting -) draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01. -) -) I support WG adoption of this draft. -) -) -) -) -) -) -)
Re: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
Support. Marco. On 1/8/14, 7:07 AM, Martin Vigoureux martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote: Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the latter case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until January the 22nd. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replicati on
Re: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01. I support WG adoption of this draft.
Re: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
support On 1/10/2014, 12:40 AM, Eric Rosen wrote: This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01. I support WG adoption of this draft.
Re: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
Support -Original Message- From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:07 AM To: l3vpn@ietf.org Cc: EXT - thomas.mo...@orange.com Subject: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the latter case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until January the 22nd. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replicat i on
Re: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
And to add tho below - I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Andrew On 1/10/2014, 6:48 AM, Dolganow, Andrew (Andrew) wrote: support On 1/10/2014, 12:40 AM, Eric Rosen wrote: This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01. I support WG adoption of this draft.
WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01
Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in the latter case, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until January the 22nd. Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thank you, Martin Thomas l3vpn chairs [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication