Hi all,
In fact, I am looking for a micro-kernel based hypervisor (like L4:pistachio or
Fiasco) to run on the SCC. The only pointer I found was a port of Fiasco OS for
Intel SCC recently
(http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/papers_ps/partheymueller-beleg.pdf) and would like
to try this.
I had a few
Adam Lackorzynski adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de writes:
Yes, please stick with 4.8 for now.
Adam
Thanks Adam! I will try that then.
___
l4-hackers mailing list
l4-hackers@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Thank you for your reply. But I think you misunderstand my questions.
First, my question is whether there is a lock.
Are you sure there is no lock for sender_list?
I think the data has to be manipulated by multiple context
as we can send to the same receiver at the same time in different cores.
… via the portal http://sel4.systems. This site will start accumulating info
through the next few weeks, please check there for updates (or subscribe to the
mailing list).
For those who haven’t heard about seL4:
- it’s the latest L4 microkernel developed by NICTA.
- according to the
Hello.
This is a really great news. Will you publish the haskell model and proof?
… via the portal http://sel4.systems. This site will start accumulating info
through the next few weeks, please check there for updates (or subscribe to
the mailing list).
For those who haven’t heard
On 5 Jun 2014, at 14:23 , Sartakov A. Vasily sarta...@ksyslabs.org wrote:
This is a really great news. Will you publish the haskell model and proof?
Yes, the lot!
Gernot
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
