[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

Iam using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics reporting. I am finding that tcreportedrateisabout 5-10% less than that reported by IPTraf for the same traffic. Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate? Rajesh

Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

Hey pal, What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???. Trevor On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote: I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics reporting. I am

[Re: [LARTC] marking in OUTPUT --mangle; locally generated packetsand route lookup - broken?]

Hi Patrick, Thanks for you message. I double checked, and my kernel .config is y to FWMARKing. I'm on 2.4.20-13.8 with iptables 1.2.8. The netfilter list suggested *not* using an aliased address, which i tried and that failed. bummer. More testing ... BTW, is there a way to trace or debug

[LARTC] Why arent filteres working? (as I wanted)

Here goes the filter statements: #Initializing traffic control... tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1:0 htb #Loading queue disciplines for plis230 network... tc class add dev br0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit #Loading queue disciplines for pmad048 network... tc class add dev

[LARTC] what is wrong with this configuration?

In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq.

[LARTC] u32 classifier

Title: u32 classifier Dear list, I have some problems with u32 classifier. I use a board based on Motorola MPC8245 processor (ppc based). I noticed that when the u32_classify function (in /net/sched/cls_u32.c) is called, it returns an error. Making some printk-based debug I found that the

[LARTC] BGP with LARTC

Hi all iam trying to Deploy BGP with Linux BOX i have 3 provider, i want to take the Full-Routing from them what is best PC configuration, required for this setup Some expert put coment on this will be Good or any resource URLs will be thanks regards hare

[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate

Title: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate Trevor, Thanks for pointing out one of the possible reasons for the difference. However, in this case I have also tried using the local display and got similar results ( though the difference reduces a bit). Thanks,

[LARTC] Mass Mailing Programs and Email Spiders

Am having this problem that mass mailing programs and email spiders are not being limited to the bandwidth i restrict for the computer that uses it. whenever this programs are run, the choke up all downlink and uplink bandwidth. can someone offer some suggestion or solution? thanks K

Re: [LARTC] BGP with LARTC

Witam, hr iam trying to Deploy BGP with Linux BOX hr i have 3 provider, i want to take the Full-Routing from them what is hr best PC configuration, required for this setup Take as fast processor and as much memory you can - it's cheap. I've had some machines with anything from PIII550