Hi!
I have been drafting a blueprint around Dell's Ideastorm idea.
Considering that the current means to get user wishes feedback is not
really good (see discussion in the blueprint) and considering
Ideastorm success for Dell, i was thinking of using this idea to
assess the user wishes.
Right
Hi!
The WONTFIX is only available for Ubuntu QA members :-)
Citando Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:01:55AM -0500, Justin Dugger wrote:
Firstly, I think it's a bit silly to be talking about WONTFIX when
it's not a valid status I can find in Launchpad.
On September 19, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I think the new feature of LP 1.1.9 to automatically close bugs after
61 days, will be good to close most of non-important bugs.
How about to introduce it also to Answers ? To get them expired...
This is already implemented. Questions
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:59:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about to introduce it also to Answers ? To get them expired...
Well, Answers already offers this feature; it was actually the first
place where we offered it.
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:01:55AM -0500, Justin Dugger wrote:
Firstly, I think it's a bit silly to be talking about WONTFIX when
it's not a valid status I can find in Launchpad. Currently, WONTFIX
Uhm, there actually is a Won't Fix status in Launchpad. I'm not sure
where you looked!
--
HI all,
We really need clarify and nail down the acceptable licenses part of
the PPA TOS and PPAQuickStart page. Right now the TOS has:
You understand and agree that any content you upload to PPAs must be
freely redistributable by Canonical, and licensed under any OSI
approved license.
Good points. I'll take this one on.
On 9/19/07, Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI all,
We really need clarify and nail down the acceptable licenses part of
the PPA TOS and PPAQuickStart page. Right now the TOS has:
You understand and agree that any content you upload to PPAs must
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:40:46PM -0500, Anthony Yarusso wrote:
15:23 kiko tonyyarusso, dapper isn't supported.
15:24 mpt kiko, is that written anywhere (other than the logs of
this IRC channel)?
Embarassing! It wasn't written down because I was confused; we do
support dapper. Tony, give
