[leaf-devel] bering-uclibc4 - missing .config

2010-04-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hello Andrew; can you pls commit .config in source/buildenv thx kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[leaf-devel] project pages

2010-04-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hello Mike; Some of the project looks, hmm a bit cluttered - see: http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/?group_id=13751ugn=leaf Can you fix it? kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing

Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-04-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 00:01:14 schrieb Paul Rogers: That said I hope that both efforts will end up in a joint project, which may (or should?) get a new name. Not only that it is based on a 2.6 kernel and it marks the end of floppy-runnable versions, it shall I'm still running

Re: [leaf-devel] project pages

2010-04-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 22:57 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hello Mike; Some of the project looks, hmm a bit cluttered - see: http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/?group_id=13751ugn=leaf Can you fix it? KP, I looked at the stats page above, and I'm not seeing what you want me to correct.

Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-04-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:01 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: That said I hope that both efforts will end up in a joint project, which may (or should?) get a new name. Not only that it is based on a 2.6 kernel and it marks the end of floppy-runnable versions, it shall I'm still running

Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-04-28 Thread Paul Rogers
I'm still running Bering-1.2. Wow, that's a pretty old version. I suggest you better update due to security reasons. I may give it some consideration after I get a chance to see 3.01 in action. I'm running a fairly restrictive internal firewall also. The 2.6 kernel is that large, that a

Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-04-28 Thread Mike
On 04/28/10 17:57, Mike Noyes wrote: On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:01 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: That said I hope that both efforts will end up in a joint project, which may (or should?) get a new name. Not only that it is based on a 2.6 kernel and it marks the end of floppy-runnable versions,

Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-04-28 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 18:17 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: -snip- Maybe we create a basic bootable floppy version, where packages can be added... But you've already got that in the existing/previous versions. Just leave them available is all I'm suggesting. Paul, The old versions will be