Am Samstag, 2. Oktober 2010, 00:52:16 schrieb Mike Noyes:
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 22:55 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
-snip-
4. IMHO we could do better at tracking problems / enhancement requests
and assigning ownership for fixes. Right now there are only a few active
developers and this
Hi kp,
I'm glad that I was able to help you find the problem.
I learned a little about hostapd, which was useful to me.
dMb
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 07:09 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Oktober 2010, 22:10:57 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi kp,
Good news - hostapd works for me!
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 08:17 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Oktober 2010, 00:52:16 schrieb Mike Noyes:
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 22:55 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
-snip-
4. IMHO we could do better at tracking problems / enhancement requests
and assigning ownership for fixes.
Hi,
We currently have a build failure for ipvsadm.lrp. This is fixable with
the latest upstream (1.21-11 - 1.25) which is in any case recommended
(required?) for 2.6 kernels. I will upload the new version to CVS.
So far so good but I noticed that we do *not* currently have IP virtual
server
Hi,
I have just fixed the radius package (simple syntax error) and also
ipvsadm as per my earlier mail.
In respect of the some of the remaining build failures:
speedtouch:
Error looks similar to radius so probably fixable.
samba22:
Latest upstream is 3.5.5. Better to upgrade to that
