03.02.2016 22:47, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Am 03.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi.
>>
> ...>>
>>> Erich made the proposal to change the init scripts of such packages to mount
>>> modules.sqfs and load whatever required.
>> Good solution.
>>
>> But IMHO we should leave possibility to
Hi Andrew
Am 03.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
>
...>>
>> Erich made the proposal to change the init scripts of such packages to mount
>> modules.sqfs and load whatever required.
> Good solution.
>
> But IMHO we should leave possibility to use old behavior on systems.
What behaviour
Hi all;
I'll try to summarize the current and proposed status of loading modules as
this raises questions.
Pls correct me whereelse needed if I missed something or got it wrong.
This summary is based on 5.2.x, master and new-initrd-6x branch
A) The current status
At the time we do have
Hi Andrew
Am 03.02.2016 um 22:56 schrieb Andrew:
> 03.02.2016 22:47, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> Am 03.02.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Andrew:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>> ...>>
Erich made the proposal to change the init scripts of such packages to
mount
modules.sqfs and load whatever
Hi.
03.02.2016 17:44, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi all;
>
> I'll try to summarize the current and proposed status of loading modules as
> this raises questions.
>
> Pls correct me whereelse needed if I missed something or got it wrong.
>
> This summary is based on 5.2.x, master and new-initrd-6x
