It just blocks killing on console logout (IMHO it'll be bad if all
remains mounted after logout). It oesn't hurt TERM/KILL signals.
31.03.2016 11:35, Erich Titl пишет:
> Am 31.03.2016 um 10:30 schrieb Andrew:
>> 31.03.2016 01:32, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> Am 30.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Andrew:
Am 31.03.2016 um 10:30 schrieb Andrew:
> 31.03.2016 01:32, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Am 30.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Andrew:
>>> 30.03.2016 17:17, Erich Titl пишет:
...
> Command can push itself in background. Something like this:
>
> if [ "$1" == "--nofork" ]; then
> umount all fs here
> else
>
31.03.2016 01:32, Erich Titl пишет:
> Am 30.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Andrew:
>> 30.03.2016 17:17, Erich Titl пишет:
> ...
>>> There are a few drawbacks with the invocation
>>>
>>> - umount_delayed must be pushed to the background to terminate
>> it may call itself with some parameter (that
Am 31.03.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Andrew:
> It just blocks killing on console logout (IMHO it'll be bad if all
> remains mounted after logout)
sure
. It oesn't hurt TERM/KILL signals.
Tests have shown problems for some reason. normal background operation
works fine.
cheers
ET
Hi KP
Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
...>
> The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect now
> is loading modules from /etc/modules rather than loading hardware.
> This way I can add pppoe to /etc/modules, run hwdtect (of "f" from lrcfg
> menu)
>
Hi Erich;
Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016, 19:00:45 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> ...>
>
> > The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect
> > now is loading modules from /etc/modules rather than loading hardware.
> >
Am Montag, 28. März 2016, 22:13:37 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 27.03.2016 um 18:26 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016, 16:03:06 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> Am 26.03.2016 um 16:55 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> >>> H Gents;
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> At last I changed
Am 31.03.2016 um 19:26 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> Hi Erich;
>
> Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016, 19:00:45 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Hi KP
>>
>> Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
>> ...>
>>
>>> The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect
>>> now is loading