Re: [leaf-devel] http server

Hi KP Am 10.01.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 10.01.2016 um 11:45 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >> About 100kb more than mini_httpd, depends also on included modules. > > Right now we don't have that many requirements, possibly only ssl I have recompiled lighttpd for ssl support.

Re: [leaf-devel] http server

Hi KP Am 10.01.2016 um 11:45 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > About 100kb more than mini_httpd, depends also on included modules. Right now we don't have that many requirements, possibly only ssl cheers ET -- Site24x7 APM

Re: [leaf-devel] http server

Hi KP Am 10.01.2016 um 08:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 00:26:57 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> ... >> * update lighttpd to 1.4.39 >> >> Is there a benefit in using lighthttpd over mini_httpd? If so, should we >> drop mini_httpd? > > While it's still small it's

Re: [leaf-devel] http server

Hi Erich; Am Sonntag, 10. Januar 2016, 11:18:09 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 10.01.2016 um 08:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 00:26:57 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > >> ... > >> * update lighttpd to 1.4.39 > >> > >> Is there a benefit in using

[leaf-devel] upcoming LEAF Bering-uClibc version

Hi all just a short note that 6.0 is making progress. Whilst I'm running the gcc 5.3.0, uClibc-ng 1.0.10 toolchain for about a week, this mail is send via a LEAF router with kernel version 4.4-rc8. kp -- Site24x7

Re: [leaf-devel] http server

Hi KP Am 10.01.2016 um 11:45 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > .. >> >> Details? If it supports some kind of CGI is should just work. > > I believe we need to adjust install pathes and look into the configuration as > well. Though I haven't looked into it seriously. I gave it a try