Re: [leaf-devel] What about removing moddb?

2016-03-31 Thread Erich Titl
Am 31.03.2016 um 19:26 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > > Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016, 19:00:45 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >> ...> >> >>> The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect >>> now is loading

Re: [leaf-devel] What about removing moddb?

2016-03-31 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016, 19:00:45 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > ...> > > > The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect > > now is loading modules from /etc/modules rather than loading hardware. > >

Re: [leaf-devel] What about removing moddb?

2016-03-31 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 31.03.2016 um 17:31 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ...> > The name "hwdetect" is misleading. The more interesting part of hwdetect now > is loading modules from /etc/modules rather than loading hardware. > This way I can add pppoe to /etc/modules, run hwdtect (of "f" from lrcfg > menu) >

Re: [leaf-devel] What about removing moddb?

2016-03-31 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 28. März 2016, 22:13:37 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 27.03.2016 um 18:26 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016, 16:03:06 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > >> Am 26.03.2016 um 16:55 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > >>> H Gents; > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> At last I changed

Re: [leaf-devel] Delayed umount

2016-03-31 Thread Erich Titl
Am 31.03.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Andrew: > It just blocks killing on console logout (IMHO it'll be bad if all > remains mounted after logout) sure . It oesn't hurt TERM/KILL signals. Tests have shown problems for some reason. normal background operation works fine. cheers ET

Re: [leaf-devel] Delayed umount

2016-03-31 Thread Andrew
It just blocks killing on console logout (IMHO it'll be bad if all remains mounted after logout). It oesn't hurt TERM/KILL signals. 31.03.2016 11:35, Erich Titl пишет: > Am 31.03.2016 um 10:30 schrieb Andrew: >> 31.03.2016 01:32, Erich Titl пишет: >>> Am 30.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Andrew:

Re: [leaf-devel] Delayed umount

2016-03-31 Thread Erich Titl
Am 31.03.2016 um 10:30 schrieb Andrew: > 31.03.2016 01:32, Erich Titl пишет: >> Am 30.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Andrew: >>> 30.03.2016 17:17, Erich Titl пишет: ... > Command can push itself in background. Something like this: > > if [ "$1" == "--nofork" ]; then > umount all fs here > else >

Re: [leaf-devel] Delayed umount

2016-03-31 Thread Andrew
31.03.2016 01:32, Erich Titl пишет: > Am 30.03.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Andrew: >> 30.03.2016 17:17, Erich Titl пишет: > ... >>> There are a few drawbacks with the invocation >>> >>> - umount_delayed must be pushed to the background to terminate >> it may call itself with some parameter (that