Hi Erich; Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2017, 20:08:59 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 15.01.2017 um 16:35 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi all; > > > > I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review. > > > > While I believe we should wait for an official new LTS kernel (probably > > 4.10), upgrading the kernel to 4.9 made me aware of missing and failing > > packages (ipt-netflow, igb,...), the only remaining package to fail is > > perf.lrp. And hopefully it will be easier to upgrade to 4.10, once we > > ironed out errors with the 4.9 kernel. > > I am not overly concerned, but should such a change not be committed to > a different branch until the problems are ironed out?
I'm not concerned as well. You probaly may correct, but then i486 and x86:_64 toolchain are AFAIK in a good shape when building all packages - with the only exception of perf.lrp. The master repository is meant for the next major version, and therefor for a given time in a fluent state. Providing a repo that builds and works for most of our targets seems good enough to commit changes. IMHO important is now to review the changes and to find errors I may have made whe updating the kernel. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
