Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-29 Thread Andrew
buildpacket does not rely on apkg at all; buildpacket creates tarball, and apkg extracts it much later. trouble is here: # fetch the numeric uid/gid is user- and group-names were specified my ($uid, $gid) = split(/\:/,$ownership); if (!isNumeric($uid)) {

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 29.01.2017 um 14:33 schrieb Andrew: this is not an apkg issue. it's an buildpacket issue. Alledgedly buildpacket has requirements that cannot always be met, because apkg cannot or does not set UID/permissions. I see this as a weakness of the packaging system. cheers ET

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-29 Thread Andrew
this is not an apkg issue. it's an buildpacket issue. On 29.01.2017 02:38, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi KP > > Am 29.01.2017 um 00:45 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 10:04:59 schrieb Andrew: >>> On 28.01.2017 03:30, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi Andrew; Am Freitag,

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-28 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 29.01.2017 um 00:45 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 10:04:59 schrieb Andrew: On 28.01.2017 03:30, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi Andrew; Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2017, 20:55:15 schrieb Andrew: Hi. I've fixed perf, it should be built now. I'm testing... Also I

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-28 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 10:04:59 schrieb Andrew: > On 28.01.2017 03:30, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Hi Andrew; > > > > Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2017, 20:55:15 schrieb Andrew: > >> Hi. > >> > >> I've fixed perf, it should be built now. > > > > I'm testing... > > > >> Also I noticed one

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-28 Thread Andrew
On 28.01.2017 03:30, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi Andrew; > > Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2017, 20:55:15 schrieb Andrew: >> Hi. >> >> I've fixed perf, it should be built now. > I'm testing... > >> Also I noticed one trouble with packaging: when owner/group is set as >> literal (for ex., www-data),

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-27 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2017, 20:55:15 schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > > I've fixed perf, it should be built now. I'm testing... > Also I noticed one trouble with packaging: when owner/group is set as > literal (for ex., www-data), buildpacket.pl tried to resolve it using > system passwd

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-27 Thread Andrew
Hi. I've fixed perf, it should be built now. Also I noticed one trouble with packaging: when owner/group is set as literal (for ex., www-data), buildpacket.pl tried to resolve it using system passwd file. Which may not correspond to platform passwd... On 15.01.2017 18:35, kp kirchdoerfer

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-16 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2017, 20:08:59 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 15.01.2017 um 16:35 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi all; > > > > I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review. > > > > While I believe we should wait for an official new LTS kernel (probably > > 4.10),

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-15 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 15.01.2017 um 16:35 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi all; > > I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review. > > While I believe we should wait for an official new LTS kernel (probably 4.10), > upgrading the kernel to 4.9 made me aware of missing and failing packages > (ipt-netflow,

[leaf-devel] kernel 4.9 in master

2017-01-15 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi all; I've committed a 4.9.(3) kernel to master for review. While I believe we should wait for an official new LTS kernel (probably 4.10), upgrading the kernel to 4.9 made me aware of missing and failing packages (ipt-netflow, igb,...), the only remaining package to fail is perf.lrp. And