Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-17 Thread Helen McCall
Steve, just as an aside, and not as a long term genealogist, I have an event called servants which I use for any census paper that has one, giving names etc.  Means I can search on it and as someone else commented, give more depth to results on a particular family.  I

RE: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-15 Thread William Boswell
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms I never used to, but I have found over the years that many of my families took on nieces and nephews to be their 'staff', so surprising individuals turned up where I least expected them! Ros On 14/01/2016 00:09, Janet McLeod wrote: >

RE: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-15 Thread Steve Wilson
@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms I have even found Boarders that were either family members or married a family member. I usually add them to my To-Do list. I don't add servants unless I have proof they are related. I did it once for a family servant

[LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread Steve Wilson
Hi, I have a question about staff/servant that are listed as part of a household on a census form. I am looking at a 1910 United States Federal Census that has 2 people listed as part of the household; a cook and a nurse. I do not include these people as part of the household when entering

Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread R G Strong-genes
:09 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms Hi, I have a question about staff/servant that are listed as part of a household on a census form. I am looking at a 1910 United States Federal Census that has 2 people listed as part of the hou

RE: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread Janet McLeod
staff. Likewise when themselves were the staff. Jan From: Steve Wilson [mailto:ltsj...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 14 January 2016 9:39 AM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms Hi, I have a question about staff/servant that are listed

Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread Ros Haywood
ves were the staff. > > Jan > > *From:*Steve Wilson [mailto:ltsj...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, 14 January 2016 9:39 AM > *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com > *Subject:* [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms > > Hi, > > I have a question about staff/serva

Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread Steve Hayes
On 13 Jan 2016 at 18:09, Steve Wilson wrote: > I am looking at a 1910 United States Federal Census that has 2 people listed > as part of the household; a cook and a nurse. I do not include these people as > part of the household when entering census information. What do other people > do? I

Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread Cathy Pinner
I always include them in the transcription of the household. They say so much about the household whether it's family who employed servants or family working as servants. I knew of one for years who was with the family for two censuses and had actually moved with the family. I've since discovered

Re: [LegacyUG] Household Staff on Census Forms

2016-01-13 Thread BARTON LEWIS
I agree, I would enter them in the transcription of the census entry.  When abstracting a record, I feel it's appropriate to leave out certain language (like boilerplate language in a deed), but when transcribing a record, it's not appropriate to selectively edit the material (usually and not