El Lunes, 11 de Diciembre de 2006 07:00, Luca escribió:
In blfs-book-sources Makefile there's the target make tex that has the
dependency of db2latex; the latter is not installed in blfs-book (I
installed it following the stylesheets installation); when I tried
passing make tex it broke
Hello,
Archaic turned my attention to the following piece of GCC Chapter 6
build log in LFS SVN (also present in the LiveCD trunk logs):
echo | /lfs-livecd/packages/gcc/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/lfs-livecd/packages/gcc/gcc-build/./gcc/
-B/usr/i486-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
M.Canales.es wrote:
Yes, it's broken. In the first xsltproc command the --xinclude option is
missing. And when generating the blfs-book.tex file the parsing fails with:
compilation error:
file /usr/share/docbook/db2latex-xsl-0.8pre1/xsl/qandaset.mod.xsl line 366
element template
El Lunes, 11 de Diciembre de 2006 12:46, Luca escribió:
Now it's clearer; I'm not 100% sure but when I passed make tex maybe the
errors were others and not the one you mentioned, they should be
something like DB2Latex: Need to process XPath match book/xi:include but
as already said not sure.
El Lunes, 11 de Diciembre de 2006 12:06, M.Canales.es escribió:
I never played with it due that are very buggy, are unmantained, and I
don't know TeX sintax.
Actually looks that there is some very slow development, in
http://db2latex.sourceforge.net/snapshot/
the last snapshop is dated
On 11/12/06, Robert Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/libdv/libdv-0.104/libdv'
if /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CC
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall -g -MT
YUY2.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/YUY2.Tpo -c -o YUY2.lo YUY2.c; \
On 12/10/06, Robert Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this thread:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2006-September/031520.html
with the same error I got:
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/libdv/libdv-0.104/libdv'
if /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile
Hi guys,
Things are going to move real quick now and I'm not able to give 24 hours
notice anymore. Here's what happened.
I was planning on doing all the final little details on the server over
the weekend, give you guys the promised minimum 24 hours notice today and
put it in tomorrow (Tuesday).
Hi guys,
Things are going to move real quick now and I'm not able to give 24
hours notice anymore.
Sorry to hear you're ill, Gerard. I can be contacted on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if needs be.
Best wishes, and good luck with the server deployment.
Matt.
--
Hi guys,
Things are going to move real quick now and I'm not able to give 24
hours notice anymore.
Sorry to hear you're ill, Gerard. I can be contacted on
Oh crap. That reply should have gone straight to Gerard, not to the list.
Now I'm gonna get bombarded with spam unless anyone can
Hello,
Archaic turned my attention to the following piece of GCC Chapter 6
build log in LFS SVN (also present in the LiveCD trunk logs):
Thanks, Alexander. I've raised a ticket for this so it doesn't get
forgotten about.
Regards,
Matt.
--
Oh crap. That reply should have gone straight to Gerard, not to the list.
Now I'm gonna get bombarded with spam unless anyone can think of a way of
undoing the sending of an email? (could we somehow fool mailman into
thinking it never got sent and let it regenerate the archives, thereby
12 matches
Mail list logo
