On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:25:25 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Hi,
Have you seen the thread on -support starting on nov 4: Check-0.9.10
can't find subunit/child.h - LFS 7.4?
It turns out that if both libsubunit and pkgconfig are installed on the
host, check's
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:41:52 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I just ran jhalfs against the latest files and had one anomaly in the
new make-4.0 checks:
functions/file ..
*** Test died (functions/file): Opened read-only file!
FAILED
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:02:13 +0200, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Actually,
chapter 7 has never been updated for systemd, even in the systemd book.
Not sure it is needed though. When I made the tickets, that book was
maintained, so I thought the tickets might help. But there
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:00:27 +0200, Igor Živković
cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr wrote:
checking for CHECK... no
configure: error: Package requirements (check = 0.9.4) were not met:
No package 'check' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed
Thanks for the patch! If Bruce doesn't pick this up before I do
this evening (GMT) then I'll apply it. One additional observation...
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 07:32:06 +, theart...@zoho.com wrote:
Index: 7.4-rc2/chapter07/udev.xml
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:20:43 +0800, JC Chong jayceech...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The HSR may need some updating.
Using an LFS 6.6 host with GCC 4.4.x, I wasn't able to build kmod 14, as I
keep getting: undefined reference to `_Static_assert' errors. kmod 13
builds just fine though. (LFS
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:46:07 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 08/20/2013 02:55 PM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: bdubbs
Date: Tue Aug 20 05:55:18 2013
New Revision: 10321
-vmlinux-linux-version;-lfs-version;-linux-version;, and
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:20:00 +0100, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 03:22:07AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 08:39:57PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 15:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
103-automake:FAIL:
On Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:07:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
With that in mind, I would like to freeze LFS (mostly) on August 15 and
release LFS-7.4-rc1. The target date for LFS-7.4 will be 1 September.
During the freeze period, some packages may be updated, but not gcc,
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:13:54 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Just for you to know: LVM could not be built with udev-lfs-198-2. Builds
OK with 198-3.
Thanks.
Thanks, Pierre. With Armin's patch now in, we should be able to prevent issues
like that from occurring again.
On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:20:23 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
I really meant --with-sysroot. That switch is defined in ld's configure,
not the top one.
(it might be better to use --with-sysroot=/, but --with-sysroot
works for me).
I *always* forget about binutils'
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:00:48 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Not a big deal, but this should be:
!ENTITY version SVN-20130227
instead of
!ENTITY version SVN-2013027
Thanks, Pierre. Fixed now.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:22:00 -0600, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
at least using jhalfs. It seems to build the executable OK, but then
makeinfo --split-size=500 --split-size=500 --no-split -I . -I
../../gcc-4.7.2/gcc/doc \
-I
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:31:05 +1300, cybertao psyber...@gmail.com wrote:
I just finished building this, ironed out my mistakes (journald barfing
because there's no machine-id is a good one!), and couldn't be more
pleased
with myself. And immensely grateful for all the work that went into this.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:02:41 +, lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
Generates header files that can be read by commandgettext./command
Shouldn't the '.' be outside of the xml 'command' tag
Right you are. Well spotted. Fixed in r10137.
Regards,
Matt.
--
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:48:28 +0100, Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote:
Also, I just merged expat into systemd branch, but there is no commit
message. I am subscribed to lfs-book. What am I doing wrong?
Bruce already covered the commit message issue. I've actually got all of
systemd and its
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:45:36 +, lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
Hi,
There appears to be no entry for 'Libpipeline' on the 'Rationale ...' page
('.../prologue/package-choices...') in the lfs book, for lfs versions
SVN-20130211, 7.2, 7.1, and 7.0 .
If a package is deemed
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:44:27 +0800, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
Creating and cleaning /home/username/tmp
Processing bootscripts...
Validating the book...
index.xml:57: element varlistentry: validity error : Element varlistentry
content does not follow the DTD, expecting (term+ , listitem),
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:09:50 -0400, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
The file system is ext3 the same as on each box. Rsync is not an option
as only the desktop machine has it at this time.
cp -av doesn't work either, the copy never happens but the result in the
term shows every
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:14:26 + (UTC), Chris W. wagnerlia-li...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to better understand the inner workings of systemd. Just having
finished a LFS install on a test server, I thought LFS 7.2 might be a
good basis for this.
snip
I hope you'll find this
And further to Ken's observation, this took about
2 hrs 15 to hit my inbox after posting. Bruce, would you
mind taking a look at mailman to see if it's too busy
processing spam or whatever it was that caused this last
time please?
Thanks,
Matt.
--
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:15:32 +0800, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we should replace ip addr show ${IFACE} with ip -f inet addr
show ${IFACE}.
It would help if you explained *why* you think this needs changing.
Does the current code not work? If so, how does the bug/issue manifest
itself?
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:18:55 +0200, Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote:
Heh sorry, changelog says 2.6.1 was added 2 days ago.
Doh, mea culpa. Bison had a new release while I was working on my
patch set. I bumped the version in packages.ent and forgot to bump it in
the changelog. I'll fix up
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:05:32 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Two questions still arise. Does LFS need to be able to support this
unusual configuration out of the box? Does the virtual multi-nic
configuration need to be set in the udev rules prior to the first boot?
Well, I
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:24:31 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
According to the udev-182 rule, the vmware nics have a mac address of
00:0c:29:xx:xx:xx or 00:50:56:xx:xx:xx. That matches the only version
of vmware that I have access to. That rule,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:07:37 +0100, Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote:
Hello All
From the that's what you get for touching that dept:
I've been testing the development versions of gcc and glibc (from svn
and git) and lately I've seen some breakage related to libgcc_s.so.
Current
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:40:39 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some
responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split.
I figured we'd get that type of response, if any at all.
Given the
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:57:21 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest this topic be dropped as moot. The discussion doesn't add
anything and we are agreed that today 3.4.1 is the latest stable version.
On the contrary, I think it's important that folks here understand a bit
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 12:22 +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Comparing my old LFS 6.6 with my new LFS 6.7 I see that:
LFS 6.6 (gmp-5.0.0):
libgmp.a
libgmp.la
libgmp.so
libgmp.so.3
libgmp.so.3.6.0
LFS 6.7 (gmp-5.0.1):
libgmp.a
On Tue, 29 May 2012 23:42:41 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Otherwise I think the patch is good. If someone (Matt?) can test and
confirm that it works, I'll put it in the book.
Sure, I'll try to kick off a test build tonight, once I've committed my
pending patches.
Thanks
On Tue, 29 May 2012 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT), Fernando de Oliveira
fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Digging into this since yesterday evening, discovered first that 3.4 is
dev and stable version is 3.3.7, second, the error is well known:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:01:33 -0600, Matthew Burgess
matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:48:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm in the middle of a jh build right now. Just finishing up Chapter 5.
I'll take a look when it completes. The toolchain
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:23:58 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com wrote:
On 4/23/12 1:11 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
The reason is that /tools/bin/su cannot work for a normal user,
because the setuid bit cannot be set at install in chapter 5 (if
installing as user lfs).
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:48:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the middle of a jh build right now. Just finishing up Chapter 5.
I'll take a look when it completes. The toolchain built without complaint.
Thanks. Note that the sed added in r9799 masks the test failures
That's because we (LFS) dropped the uname patch from
our build instructions because upstream won't take
it in its current form. If my understanding is
correct, the correct way of implementing this feature
is by a combination of changes in the kernel Glibc.
I don't have the skill necessary to do
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:01:59 +0200, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Hi,
I've tried the last svn version on my old pentium-m
laptop.
1- The error:
/mnt/lfs/sources/libc-build/math/s_frexp.os.dt -MT
/mnt/lfs/sources/libc-build/math/s_frexp.os
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:32:41 +0200, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Hi,
Successful build up to gcc-pass2 as per Jeremy's new build method,
gcc-4.7+glibc-2.15:
Thanks for your notes. For the time being, I'm going to make the minimum
changes
necessary to get LFS built with
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:24:27 +, Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:47:18 +
Matthew Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
I must admit to being really confused by your need for these
workarounds.
Me too. It makes me feel stupid.
I think you're
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:02:24 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Should be corrected in current upstream patch list. Do not know
if you LFS devs think it is a big issue (having math.h needlessly
included when ncurses C++ bindings are used). I suggest
waiting for the next
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:30:06 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Le 17/02/2012 07:37, xinglp a écrit :
This is the log produced by jhalfs, some errors in it, but it worked
well when build lfs.
Thanks for the report. I knew that, but the reason is outside
jhalfs. It is in
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:51:34 +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
jmeng...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Hi,
An user suggested some fix for the book, in particular for wget-list.
Those links don't exist in the current SVN trunk version of the book at
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:00:31 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork
jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com wrote:
Was just reviewing your kmod build instructions - haven't built it yet
myself, but it's noticeably missing lsmod - shouldn't this be another
symlink to kmod?
Yup, if you look closely you'll notice I
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:44:55 -0600, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I built LFS tonight on a kvm VM. Here are a couple of comments:
The total build time was 6.3 hours. The last build (LFS 7.0) on the
same machine, but on the HW was 4.1 hours. That's a 50% increase in
time. I'm
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:11:26 +, Firerat fire...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I noticed a small problem with kmod-4 in the current svn ( 9714 )
the book details
./test/test-loaded
to perform tests, however for me this fails ( no file found )
if I instead do
make check
the
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA
lately.
I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it.
ICA is broken because of the part in glibc's
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:10 -0600, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want to step on Matt's toes, but I'm going to make a change in
the bootscripts and section 8.2/8.3 in a couple of minutes.
No probs, Bruce. As per $subject, my patch is WIP, so feel free to make
any changes.
Markku Pesonen tour...@gmail.com wrote
iproute2 doesn't even use the headers. See this commit in upstream:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git;a=commit;h=13603f6a9e46f08576f6284a0ef1ce1fbf94ffe0
Nice! I'll try a libnl-less build tonight with relevant seds to prevent
On 12/12/11 22:12, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
Hi,
At chapter 6.19, bzip2, in lfs 7.0 and newer, I note:
Compile and check the package:
make
A French user tells me that we should add make check.
A quick look at my logs shows that 'make' does in fact compile and check
the Bzip2
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:19:59 -0600, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On 11/26/2011 10:02 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 11/26/2011 09:27 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
Latest gettext configure can hang in chapter 5 on checking where .elc
files should go... if emacs is installed on the host. Should
On 22/11/2011 19:49, Ken Moffat wrote:
For LFS-svn, there is *always* a possibility of breakage as soon as
you get into BLFS. Unlikely, but possible. With a fair wind, those
sort of problems will mostly be caught by the time a new LFS is
released. To be honest, I can't remember the last
On 25/10/2011 20:01, Matthew Burgess wrote:
On 25/10/2011 19:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
OK, I am busy with blfs right now. Can you do both tickets?
Sure thing.
Hi Bruce,
As you'll have seen, I've just closed the last 3 tickets for 7.0. I
think we're all done now, ready for the release
On 25/10/2011 19:06, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Reference http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2937
3.0.8 or 3.1? Changing the kernel is not particularly hard, but we need
to go ahead and publish 7.0. -rc2 has been out for 2 weeks and there
have only been minor changes. We need to keep a
On 25/10/2011 19:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
OK, I am busy with blfs right now. Can you do both tickets?
Sure thing.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:48:17 +0200, feralert feral...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As I am new in LFS and this is my first attempt, I have a couple of
comments that might help make the book easier to follow (at least to a
non-english newbie like me).
Firstly, welcome!
- While going through
On 16/10/2011 19:50, Ken Moffat wrote:
Is there a problem with the LFS server ? I'm getting mail from the
lists, but I can't connect to linuxfromscratch.org using a browser
(times out), and if I try 'svn up' the remote connection is reported
as getting closed. And ssh appears not to work -
On 08/10/2011 16:33, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Right. I'll fix that today.
-- Bruce
Thanks for that, Bruce. My working copy had that in (it had to have
done, otherwise my jhalfs based build would have failed), but somehow it
got lost. It must have just been a quilt-related screw up on my
On 05/10/2011 23:24, Matthew Burgess wrote:
On 05/10/2011 22:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That sounds like a nice simple approach. Does it still place its .pc
files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig?
Hi Bruce,
Here's the complete patch I've kicked off a test build with. Your
machine may just beat mine
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:45:13 -0700, Bryan Kadzban br...@kadzban.is-a-geek.net
wrote:
See the attached patch for what I propose we do, at least in the short
term, or possibly longer as well.
It changes udev_retry to (in addition to using --type=failed) read
/etc/sysconfig/udev_retry (name
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:53:52 -0400, John Stanley jpsinthe...@verizon.net
wrote:
There doesn't seem to be an easy way to turn off the
libffi requirement, which is unfortunate, as libglib itself
doesn't need it. On the other hand, I've been building
lfs/blfs-like systems for several years
On 05/10/2011 22:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That sounds like a nice simple approach. Does it still place its .pc
files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig?
Hi Bruce,
Here's the complete patch I've kicked off a test build with. Your
machine may just beat mine though, if you want to verify it :-)
Regards,
On 30/09/2011 00:44, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The help-version test is doing:
for i in $built_programs; do
v=$(env $i --version | sed -n '1s/.* //p;q')
break
done
And failing with 'env: cd: No such file or directory'
$built_programs is returning:
cd .. /bin/sh ./config.status
On 30/09/2011 00:44, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Hi,
For a while now, I've had 2 test failures in coreutils, but have just
ignored them. With the latest version I saw a 3rd failure, which made
me relook at Coreutils' test suite. The failures I see are:
misc/help-version
On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote:
It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python.
Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually that bothered by those 2
dependencies. libffi has no dependencies itself, and Python has no
mandatory dependencies, so it's only 2 packages that need to
On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream:
Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is Add Pkg-Config as it's
a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches. However, that
ChangeLog entry is within a whole bunch of Util-Linux changes,
On 27/09/2011 20:24, Matthew Burgess wrote:
On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream:
Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is Add Pkg-Config as it's
a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches. However, that
ChangeLog entry
On 27/09/2011 22:35, Ken Moffat wrote:
With respect, Matt, it's the glib2 part that is bloat. I remember
some discussion, but I forget why we did it
pkg-config upstream, as of 0.26, removed the internal Glib-1 that it
used to bundle, therefore forcing us to install a system-wide copy and
On 16/09/2011 19:09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:46:08 +0100
Matthew Burgessmatt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
So, based on the above, 5 is definitely something to look into I think.
If that doesn't pan out, then I think option 2 is the next 'least
On 15/09/2011 20:38, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
snip nice description of the issue
There are options about what to do right now:
1. Leave in the warning message and optionally write something about it
in the book.
We try, generally, to accomodate changes in upstream programs. I'll
defer to
On 15/09/2011 20:38, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
snip nice description of the issue
There are options about what to do right now:
1. Leave in the warning message and optionally write something about it
in the book.
We try, generally, to accomodate changes in upstream programs. I'll
defer to
On 12/09/2011 20:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt,
I saw your conversation with Kay Sievers at
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.hotplug.devel/17011
How do we want to address this? I'm not sure that the advice to ignore
the clock setting and always use ntp is the best approach. It
On 11/09/2011 19:40, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
This period of time where we discuss migrations would be a good time for
us to discuss any wholesome changes we might like to implement. We can
start off with a new server and a clean slate instead of blindly
replicating the current setup and
On 12/09/2011 00:21, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:09:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Maybe, moving to git instead of svn ? Git is a bitch to become
comfortable with [ I dropped out of clfs when they moved to it ] but
it does make branching easy. Perhaps that isn't an issue in
On 12/09/2011 00:23, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Speaking of mailing lists. I wasn't going to bring it up yet but I have
toyed with the idea for several years now of moving away from the idea
of email based mailing lists and moving to a forum based system. Before
all us old timers (myself
On 09/09/2011 19:11, Walter Webb wrote:
I don't know if it's my own problem or a general one, but the directory
/usr/include/rpc contains one file; netdb.h. /tools/include/rpc also has
the one file. I discovered this when trying to install portmap in a
completed system.
Yes, this has been
On 09/09/2011 22:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
git.kernel.org could not be found. Please check the name and try again.
Several kernel.org servers were compromised recently and have been taken
offline for investigation. The main website, ftp site and git repos are
certainly affected by this.
On 03/09/2011 16:52, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
You modify the expected return value of a test for pkg-config and in
doing so, I think you may be invalidating the test.
Matt did that about 3 months ago.
Yeah, so I did...sometimes 'svn annotate' sucks :)
I have not yet had
On 03/09/2011 22:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On Sep 3, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
Confirmed here with popt-1.16. It seems odd that pkg-config
bundles a version of popt known to be broken, and requires a
configure switch (with-installed-popt) to use a system
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:59:40 -0500, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
According to the home page, we should be applying the upstream patches
found here:
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-3.0.1/allpatches
See bugs section at: http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-3.0.1/
Thanks DJ, this is now ticket
On 31/08/2011 18:51, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've noticed that there is a spurious file, /t, created in the latest
builds of LFS. The file is 2 bytes long, a 0xff followed by a newline.
It is a file generated by one of the tests in grep. I'm not sure how to
find which test. It appears to be
On 31/08/2011 19:51, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Commenting out the line 'cp $in /t' does not seem to affect the test.
The question now is whether to do
sed -i 's:\(cp $in /t\):#\1:' tests/unibyte-bracket-expr
Or just delete the /t file that's created.
I'd prefer to prevent the file from being
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:10:05 +0100, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch attached to that bug applies cleanly and fixes the problem,
Firefox no longer crashes. As this is a bug in glibc-2.14 (glibc-2.13
works fine and does not need patching) I think we should add this to
the book
On 05/08/2011 03:41, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
But that raises the question of what that bootscript was trying to do
in the first place? So, it turns out that the actions specified by
'RUN+=' udev rules can fail for any of a variety of reasons, and this
script was simply
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 01:06:52 -0700, Nathan Coulson conat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Matthew Burgess
matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On 05/08/2011 03:41, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
But that raises the question of what that bootscript was trying
On 05/08/2011 19:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've thought for a while that there should be a location that is
accessible across boots that is always available (not a mountpoint).
It's a catch-22 though. How do you mount / read only (for security) and
still be able to write this persistent data?
On 05/08/2011 19:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've thought for a while that there should be a location that is
accessible across boots that is always available (not a mountpoint).
It's a catch-22 though. How do you mount / read only (for security) and
still be able to write this persistent data?
Hi all,
With the upgrade to Udev-173, we now see a warning that the call to
'udevadm trigger --type=failed --action=add' from S10udev is deprecated.
The thread starting at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg05039.html goes into more detail
about the issues involved, but in effect,
Hi all,
With the upgrade to Udev-173, we now see a warning that the call to
'udevadm trigger --type=failed --action=add' from S10udev is deprecated.
The thread starting at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg05039.html goes into more detail
about the issues involved, but in effect,
On 03/08/2011 05:23, Lemon Lime wrote:
Hello list,
I have just installed systemd on my LFS-based system, and I would like
to share my experience. Is there anyone here who is interested in
installation instructions, boot time measurements, configuration options
and other information on this
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:20:29 +0100, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
checking whether to use .ctors/.dtors header and trailer... configure:
error: missing __attribute__ ((constructor)) support??
Looks like that was caused by this change (apologies if the link
wraps awkwardly!).
On 03/08/2011 18:20, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 9:19:40 -0600
Matthew Burgessmatt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:20:29 +0100, Andrew Bentonb3n...@gmail.com wrote:
checking whether to use .ctors/.dtors header and trailer... configure:
error: missing
On 03/08/2011 18:20, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 9:19:40 -0600
Matthew Burgessmatt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:20:29 +0100, Andrew Bentonb3n...@gmail.com wrote:
checking whether to use .ctors/.dtors header and trailer... configure:
error: missing
On 02/08/2011 21:07, xinglp wrote:
2011/8/2 Bruce Dubbsbruce.du...@gmail.com:
I have made a very large, invasive change to LFS. All the bootscripts
have been rewritten.
From the change log:
[bdubbs] - Rewrite bootscripts and Chaper 7.
o Make scripts compatible with initd format (see
On 02/08/2011 22:16, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I could ask that the util-linux guys omit /run also.
Alternatively, we could do something like:
[ -d /run/var ] || return
in the appropriate places in functions so the attempt to write is
skipped if the /run/var directory is missing.
What do
On 20/07/2011 08:12, DJ Lucas wrote:
I didn't get a chance to install yet, but did a quick walk through
I've done it the other way around. I've installed them, but not done a
walk through yet. It installs and boots the latest LFS-trunk without
issues. I'll see if I can get a walkthrough
On 27/06/2011 02:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I also see a change in
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/browser/trunk/perl/perl-5.10.1-libc-1.patch
by Matt.
I'll be glad to change this if it was an inadvertent change, but I'd
like to confirm that first.
Matt?
That definitely looks like
On 26/06/2011 20:09, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have found that if I change this to
1. sh Configure -des -Dprefix=/tools
2. make
3. cp -v perl cpan/podlators/pod2man /tools/bin
4. mkdir -pv /tools/lib/perl5/5.14.1
5. cp -Rv lib/* /tools/lib/perl5/5.14.1
then all packages in the book build
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:14:59 -0500, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On 06/06/2011 03:07 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
I'd prefer for us not to use HJL's binutils
Then don't. That patch doesn't look all that invasive..no need to add
tests for local build fix, just the 3 corrected files
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:59:19 +0100, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:21 -0600
Matthew Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
I guess the first question is, has anyone else seen this issue?
No, I don't get that. It could be because I've been using eglibc
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:52:46 -0700, Bryan Kadzban br...@kadzban.is-a-geek.net
wrote:
The problem is autoconf. By default the AC_CHECK_HEADER macro uses a
set of prerequisite headers that's supposed to cover most of the common
stuff on a system -- but that list is set up for full systems, not
Hi all,
The following is taken from my build logs when using Glibc-2.13:
checking cpuid.h usability... no
checking cpuid.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING:
1 - 100 of 905 matches
Mail list logo
