Hello,
I want to apply the attached patch to the LFS-6.2 book on the 6.2-4 CD.
May I do that? If not, what's the preferred way to ensure that jhalfs
can build a kernel without known vulnerabilities?
The README will also include the following text:
===
The original LFS book
Hello,
if one builds anything with gcc-4.1.1 with -Os -ffast-math flags, the
resulting program will segfault on modern CPUs. This is an issue for the
LiveCD, because it builds everything with -Os, and procps adds
-ffast-math (thus, ps segfaults). Upstream has fixed this, please apply
the
On 12/11/06, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I want to apply the attached patch to the LFS-6.2 book on the 6.2-4 CD.
May I do that? If not, what's the preferred way to ensure that jhalfs
can build a kernel without known vulnerabilities?
Fine by me. I was just thinking
Most service are back running now. The mailinglists just came back
online and appear to be in proper working condition. There will be some
issue with spam coming through that will be dealt with as it's noticed.
The filters and score values will need to be tweaked.
If you notice anything amiss
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
Most service are back running now. The mailinglists just came back
online and appear to be in proper working condition. There will be some
issue with spam coming through that will be dealt with as it's noticed.
The filters and score values will need to be tweaked.
On 12/16/06, Gerard Beekmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you notice anything amiss please email us at server-admin
This is minor but annoying. Trac is sending out mail to the lfs-book
list as it should, but it's setting To: undisclosed recipients.
Here's a bit from one that just came out.
This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book.
I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there.
Must be a byproduct of the new version of Trac. Until tht's figured out,
I suggest using a different filter rather than the To: header. A list
won't always
