Re: [libhid-discuss] Parsing hid_dump_tree()

2008-04-22 Thread Charles Lepple
On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:21 PM, comicinker wrote: Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 21:01 -0400 schrieb Charles Lepple: AND: How can I get the RECV_PACKET_LEN for this address automatically? Or is it always the same length for each address (6)? The test_libhid.c doesn't tell where this value is

Re: [libhid-discuss] Parsing hid_dump_tree()

2008-04-22 Thread comicinker
Am Dienstag, den 22.04.2008, 08:31 -0400 schrieb Charles Lepple: On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:21 PM, comicinker wrote: Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 21:01 -0400 schrieb Charles Lepple: AND: How can I get the RECV_PACKET_LEN for this address automatically? Or is it always the same length for

Re: [libhid-discuss] Parsing hid_dump_tree()

2008-04-21 Thread comicinker
Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 21:01 -0400 schrieb Charles Lepple: AND: How can I get the RECV_PACKET_LEN for this address automatically? Or is it always the same length for each address (6)? The test_libhid.c doesn't tell where this value is detected. It is in the interface

Re: [libhid-discuss] Parsing hid_dump_tree()

2008-03-31 Thread comicinker
I slowly understand how the structure of the libhid is. This is really great work, thanks! Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 21:01 -0400 schrieb Charles Lepple: AND: How can I get the RECV_PACKET_LEN for this address automatically? Or is it always the same length for each address (6)? The

Re: [libhid-discuss] Parsing hid_dump_tree()

2008-03-29 Thread comicinker
Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 21:01 -0400 schrieb Charles Lepple: I wouldn't advise parsing the output of that function - instead, take a look at the hidparser code that hid_dump_tree() references. Thanks, good hint. Now I also found http://libhid.alioth.debian.org/doc/ which is nowhere