https://opensource.googleblog.com/2024/04/introducing-jpegli-new-jpeg-coding-library.html
I am out of the office right now and unable to evaluate this, but suffice it to say that I doubt their claims of compression performance parity. Images compressed with Jpegli should decompress as quickly as images compressed with libjpeg-turbo, but there is additional compute complexity involved with generating custom quantization tables. Thus, the compression should be slower (although perhaps not as slow as mozjpeg.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libjpeg-turbo User Discussion/Support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to libjpeg-turbo-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/libjpeg-turbo-users/CF1DAF1F-93FB-4742-B97B-0D1CAC6D6D0D%40virtualgl.org.
