Re: [Libravatar-fans] Absence on 2018-11-25

2018-12-09 Thread clime
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 11:45, Tristan Le Guern wrote: > Thanks for your inputs. > > Le 23/11/2018 à 20:58, Francois Marier a écrit : > > In general, I think we should always return an image. That's what the > > clients are expecting. > While it makes sense I think it is also brittle as the API

Re: [Libravatar-fans] Absence on 2018-11-25

2018-11-27 Thread Tristan Le Guern
Thanks for your inputs. Le 23/11/2018 à 20:58, Francois Marier a écrit : In general, I think we should always return an image. That's what the clients are expecting. While it makes sense I think it is also brittle as the API is not future proof. I am not sure it is an important property

Re: [Libravatar-fans] Absence on 2018-11-25

2018-11-23 Thread Francois Marier
Here are my thoughts. On 2018-11-23 at 11:16:54, Tristan Le Guern wrote: > + ivatar returns an HTML document, the home page ; > + libravatar and libravatar.cgi both return the file nobody.png. In general, I think we should always return an image. That's what the clients are expecting. > *

[Libravatar-fans] Absence on 2018-11-25

2018-11-23 Thread Tristan Le Guern
Hello everyone, I will not be able to attend our next meeting so here is a list of elements of the Libravatar API for which the implementations diverge. If you can discuss them a bit so we can choose which behaviour is correct we could then have a more robust documentation. So: * What to