On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:23PM +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
The topic says it all
And that's good.
I have missed a few occurences. This next patch takes care of them.
--
Francois Tigeot
From b8bd0b7067b34dfed17efc7d535c561cb5d6e3c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francois Tigeot
And the topic is messenger again :)
F
On 12/04/11 09:49, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:07:23PM +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
The topic says it all
And that's good.
I have missed a few occurences. This next patch takes care of them.
2011/4/12 Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:29:13PM +0200, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Some of us experienced performance problems with the gitattributes
filter defined for .po files. The 'clean' filter were not only run on
commit, but also
Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
Could i remove them automatically or is better to check for context?
Hi Júlio,
the names can all go - just keep the bug id, as usual.
P.S.: What means 'OD' or 'FME' or 'PB' or ... ?
Usernames of Sun/Oracle engineers. :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpifjLGOI4Du.pgp
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm
quite sure that you already know whether it has side effects or
not... I vote for it hasn't, but I'm
Michaël Lefèvre wrote:
Actually, this was part of the easy hack hunt and destroy obsolete
macros. As I have very little time (2h/week) to join the fun, and
taking some vacation for a month, I didn't apply to this on the
wiki. To any one, fill free to complete the task.
Hi Michaël,
thanks a
Noel Power wrote:
I'm pretty sure Christina pushed the patch to do with the
_OLD_FILE_IMPL
Yep, my bad - adding tag to thread then. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp08Y4uApo2i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 22:53 +0200, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
Finished and pushed. Next step: remove duplicates from vclenum.h and add
#include fontenum.h from tools?
That would seem to be the reasonable approach to take. i.e.
vcl/prj/build.lst lists tools so tools is always build before vcl,
Hi Christina
On 09/04/11 22:08, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
[...]
So I'll remove the definition of PRE_CONDITION and POST_CONDITION and
replace the latter with OSL_POSTCOND (the former isn't used). ENSURE
will be replaced by OSL_ENSURE and DbgAssert removed. Any objections?
yeah, sounds
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:31:09PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
CVER is defined in set_solenv.in and propagated in form of defines to the
entire source tree.
And is no longer used.
The attached patch removes it from the build infrastructure.
--
Francois Tigeot
From
Hello,
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 15:05 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'm kinda in the same position as Rahul. I have send my proposal for
the port to Android but, as we are nearly at the end of the semester
I'm trying to find time to complete an easy hack for my propsal
between my multiple
_USE_UNO: I thought, that I had removed everything #ifdef'ed with
_USE_UNO. BUT I've found some occurences in ./basic. Is there a way to
search for all commits I've done so far? I'll finish that, of course!
Christina
Am 12.04.2011 10:49, schrieb Noel Power:
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten
Sophie Gautier píše v Po 11. 04. 2011 v 14:59 +0300:
Hi Yifan,
On 11/04/2011 13:59, Yifan Jiang wrote:
13:25 sophi yifan: we distinguish between l10n and native
language teams,
it's not the same members (even if it is the same language)
Would you help distinguish
Hello,
gbuild introduced using -ggdb3 for debugging information and I intend to
reduce that to -ggdb2. Let the numbers speak themselves:
789668K, 2:17 (-ggdb3)
vs
171074K, 1:06 (-ggdb2)
The first is size of libswlx.so, a binary from sw/ I picked at random, the
second is time needed to
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:01 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
it. Almost five times the size of data is really a lot more data for I/O to
shuffle back and forth.
I noticed recently that my linux --eanble-symbols solver is about 23gigs
in size, if it was e.g. half that I could play around with putting
On Tuesday 12 of April 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 16:01 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
it. Almost five times the size of data is really a lot more data for I/O
to shuffle back and forth.
I noticed recently that my linux --eanble-symbols solver is about 23gigs
in size, if
Ok Thorsten, i will check this. ;-)
Regards,
Júlio.
2011/4/12 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
Could i remove them automatically or is better to check for context?
Hi Júlio,
the names can all go - just keep the bug id, as usual.
P.S.: What means
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 14:06 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Doing something custom unfortunately has still way too much
boilerplate in gbuild esp. for small tasks. You can find an example in
tools where:
I see that you ported the sc one over, thanks for that :-)
C.
Hello
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 19:27, Christina Roßmanith chrrossman...@web.de
wrote:
Is there a way to search for all commits I've done so far? I'll finish
that, of course!
Maybe using search box in the top-right of the page like this works for you?
Hi Andras,
On 2011-04-12 at 10:37 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
On git list we were recommended to use hook instead of filter. Please
review my patch. If you apply it, don't forget to remove po filter
lines from your git config.
Looks OK. Kendy, does it sound acceptable for you as well?
2011/4/12 Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz:
Hi Andras,
On 2011-04-12 at 10:37 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
On git list we were recommended to use hook instead of filter. Please
review my patch. If you apply it, don't forget to remove po filter
lines from your git config.
Looks OK. Kendy,
Hi Caolán,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:34:24 +0100
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
I see that you ported the sc one over, thanks for that :-)
Yes, I also wanted to answer here, but could not find the thread
anymore ;)
Anyway: I also just cherrypicked that to 3-4 upon koheis request. I
From 2de03b6a40f6bfe9413a30914fbc26a01afc0969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Dargaud l...@bobiciel.com
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:09:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix bug #36069 - Date properties in 'Custom Properties' do not
scroll in UI
---
sfx2/source/dialog/dinfdlg.cxx |4 ++--
1
Hi Lubos,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:25:58 +0200
Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
solenv/inc/unxgcc.mk:LINKFLAGSOPTIMIZE*=-Wl,-O1
No, I forgot to mention, that's not the one:
[...]
This is because of the way the migration to gbuild started: By
emulating the compile/link commands of the old
Removed last occurences of _USE_UNO, built successfully and pushed.
Christina
Am 12.04.2011 10:49, schrieb Noel Power:
On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 23:42 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
I've got this problem :
Fetching dependencies for module NULL from solver... failed
Fixed now, caused by foo NULL NULL in a prj/build.lst it has to be just
one NULL, i.e. foo NULL
C.
Am 11.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Michaël Lefèvre:
Actually, this was part of the easy hack hunt and destroy obsolete
macros. As I have very little time (2h/week) to join the fun, and
taking some vacation for a month, I didn't apply to this on the
wiki. To any one, fill free to complete the task.
Le 10/04/2011 23:42, Julien Nabet a écrit :
Hello,
I've got this problem :
maryline@maryline:~/compile-libreoffice/libo$ make -r clean make
*
* Running the post download checks.
*
I've encountered the same or a very similar problem and manually copied
libgcc_s.so.1 to the external/gcc3_specific folder to work around it.
Cheers
Peter
Am 11.04.2011 um 20:28 schrieb Bálint Dózsa dozsabal...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I need some help.
I've got this problem:
build --
Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 10:48 +0100 schrieb Michael Meeks:
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 00:11 +0200, Peter Jentsch wrote:
Oh - completely :-) I'm not disagreeing, just trying to find someone
who you can work with - so eg. which component: Calc, Writer, Impress
are you most
From where you copied the libgcc_s.so.1?
Regards,
Balint Dozsa
2011. április 12. 22:49 Peter Jentsch írta, pj...@guineapics.de:
I've encountered the same or a very similar problem and manually copied
libgcc_s.so.1 to the external/gcc3_specific folder to work around it.
Cheers
Peter
Am
I found the file in /lib/i386-linux-gnu ...
Thanks for your help!
Now i'm trying to compile...
Balint
2011. április 12. 23:31 Bálint Dózsa írta, dozsabal...@gmail.com:
From where you copied the libgcc_s.so.1?
Regards,
Balint Dozsa
2011. április 12. 22:49 Peter Jentsch írta,
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Miklos Vajna
vmik...@frugalware.org wrote:
I'm attaching a patch that tries to implement this.
I've tested with our (Frugalware) junit jar where the classpath is in
manifest and
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:45:29AM +0200, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org
wrote:
It looks OK code-wise, but TBH I don't see a sense in this. Distros should fix
their jars, we shouldn't hide problems.
And if the problem is widespread - so be it. One more reason to get distro
maintainers fix it.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:58:42 +0200
Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org wrote:
What improvement does the check have? You'd still fail here. The
same as before.
It's about giving a reasonable error message early before people try
to build with buggy junit which won't work.
Which is:
a)
Hello LibreOffice developers,
I already asked this question in the chat and in the users mailinglist,
but did not receive any reply at all, so I'm taking this to the
developers mailing list.
I can't get the LibreOffice SDK to work with DotNet on Windows. I always
run into the bug which is
36 matches
Mail list logo
