On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I'm a bit puzzled by code using what is almost a complete list of all
platforms running X11 to define some features:
We also have some code dedicated to finding the origin of different X11
implementations and working around
Fixes one detail of our SDK. (It might still be broken in other ways.)
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
The printer handling code in
libs-gui/vcl/unx/generic/printer/printerinfomanager.cxx gets the list of
print queues with a combination of hardcoded platform names and shell
commands :
#if defined(LINUX) || defined(NETBSD) || defined(FREEBSD) || defined(OPENBSD)
{ /usr/sbin/lpc status, lpr
Hello Vanessa,
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 01:16, Vanessa Peay nessyness90...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I installed libre office on my computer, but now it's taking up too
much memory on my computer. I was trying to unistall it, and it wont let me
uninstall it. How can I unistall it?
This list is
Hi Francois,
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 08:20 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
If nobody gives me a reason not to in the next days, I plan to remove both
the useless #if defined list and the whole XFree section.
Patch attached.
Seems like a lot of timely cruft removal :-)
Thanks
In case you don't know, that was spam, just ignore it. Discuss it on the
discuss list if you have to.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Thanks!
On 07/06/2011 12:04 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Thomas Arnhold wrote:
it would be nice if this commit could be cherry-picked on
libreoffice-3-4-1, because without it a debug build will fail at
cui
Cherry-picked to libreoffice-3-4. Don't think 3-4-1 makes too much
sense, this is
On 07/04/2011 09:14 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Question is: Is Help-Libreoffice Credits menu entry necessary at
all if there's a link to it within the about window? I don't think
so. If we remove it, we could remove CREDITS.odt as well. Or at
least we need to sync them.
Hm, given the wide
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 00:38 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Fixes one detail of our SDK. (It might still be broken in other ways.)
Done, interesting that I was able to build third party extensions
against the 3-4 sdk despite that already. I guess it wasn't used in that
particular path.
C.
I suspect its merely the downshift to ASCII in avmedia
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=6b211c4735b3965429e82dc100ef0cd0db810fed
is likely to fix it.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi,
I've found out, that there's a whole directory doubled in the tree:
libs-gui/sax/test/sax and extensions/test/sax
I think the first one is the desired and the second could be removed. Or
is it intened, that libs-gui/sax/test/sax is an internal sax test and
extensions/test/sax is the one
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 08:52 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Shouldn't CUPS be the default printing system anywhere by now on Unix-like
systems ?
That seems reasonable to me. Cut down on the forest of potential
configurations. I think there's some dlopen/dlsym hackery around for
cups in there.
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 16:37 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
Hi,
I've found out, that there's a whole directory doubled in the tree:
libs-gui/sax/test/sax and extensions/test/sax
I think the first one is the desired and the second could be removed.
Well, extensions and sax are both
Dear everbody,
Andras gave me a helpful feedback about my program. Because of that I
discovered some issues and added them to my list. There are several
things which need to be done. (see below)
So far I fixed some bugs in my convert.py. Also I implemented the
feature to set a custom start page.
I received one of these. I did a little nosing around an found what they were
talking about with regard to one of my domain names.
I don't know if it is a real threat to squat on a related domain name or it is
a way to extract protection money.
In my case, I told them I was not concerned
Regarding this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39068
Rainer started the specification process for this.
I thought one thing we decided to do was not to re-introduce this
over-engineered, time-wasting specification process. Is this a new
development in the LibreOffice space?
Hi Cedric,
following you find the comments I've promised...
Line numbers refer to lines in your patch.
line 90:
Statics fuer Umrandungsalignment setzen.
Set borders alignment statics.
line 203:
Ausrichtung - orientation
line 246:
Irrtum - mistake (error sounds to me like the error you have
Hi Kohei,
you know that I'm both subscribed to this bug, so I feel free to comment
on this - rather from the UX point-of-view (although I know some people
from Documentation, QA, ... who think similar).
Am Samstag, den 09.07.2011, 13:39 -0400 schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
Regarding this bug
Christoph,
I feel that you are taking this in a bit too generalized way. I'm
talking about the use of a specification for this particular bug
report, which I repeatedly said is overkill. Anyway, my answers are
below.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Christoph Noack christ...@dogmatux.com wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo
