[Libreoffice] [GSoC] [rtfimport] 7th week

2011-07-11 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi, Last week starts here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/lo-gsoc/tree/README#n900 In short, it was about: - annotations - drawing objects: position, size, text, various types Miklos pgp9sOgrftajA.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Cherry-pick request for fdo#39091, gstreamer urls with accented chars not playing back

2011-07-11 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Cherry-picked and pushed, thanks. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Internal cairo and Postscript and PDF surface

2011-07-11 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 01:00 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote: Just wondering whether we need the postscript and pdf surfaces in our internal cairo build. The configury is not able to find the dependencies and bails out there because they are now recommended surfaces. Adding manually --disable-ps

[Libreoffice] easy-hacks: removing unused code, now a lot easier

2011-07-11 Thread Caolán McNamara
So. I got callcatcher up and running for the LibreOffice environment properly now. There is now a list in unusedcode.easy in the root of the source tree of functions/methods in LibreOffice which are non-virtual methods which under Linux debug mode are neither called, nor have their address taken.

Re: [Libreoffice] Are we back to having this spec process again!?

2011-07-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, So - first; when I read: On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 11:57 +0200, André Schnabel wrote: Anyway - what I really dislike from your further communication (your answer to Christoph) is the way you speak about us developers and you UX, QA and documentation guys. It's after all we who

Re: [Libreoffice] Internal cairo and Postscript and PDF surface

2011-07-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 09:33 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: We don't use these AFAIK. What platform was this one btw ? I guess there's the possibility that where we stuff the internal cairo into our install set that it'll be used by external software linked to Libo, and those bits might need

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

2011-07-11 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:11:53 +0200, Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org wrote: This is a good point. Is there any packaging script if a release rolls out? Maybe credits.odt update could be done automatically within this. It was planned to create it automatically via a script. For now, I simply

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF import patches for 3-4

2011-07-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Cedric, On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Here are two patches to review for the 3.4 branch. I know it's stupid to hack the RTF import filter... but the new one won't be in 3.4 ;) The second patch - basic-handling-of-lines looks fine to me - ack'd for -3-4.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:00:48 +0200 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: are you fine with adding the attached changes into master and libreoffice-3-4 branch? Yes, absolutely, if it help to get rid of the need for the libreoffice-build repository. FWIW, the Ubuntu-release is clean of

[Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] + Cherrypick request for 3.4.2

2011-07-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Muthu, On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 18:39 +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote: It would be great if somebody can review and cherry pick these fixes: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?id=8faf3f2e8b085285b51bd6a993efd2c9f68714d1 This sort of stuff: +if( bShowValue +

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

2011-07-11 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sebastian, On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 11:56 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: It was planned to create it automatically via a script. For now, I simply run it from time to time on my laptop, creating an .html file which had been manually converted to .odt. Ah - so, we can prolly do that

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] + Cherrypick request for 3.4.2

2011-07-11 Thread Muthu Subramanian K
Hi, Thank you! This sort of stuff: +if( bShowValue +!bShowPercent rTypeInfo.meTypeCategory == TYPECATEGORY_PIE +rDataLabel.maNumberFormat.maFormatCode.indexOfAsciiL(%, 1) = 0 ) +{ +bShowValue = false; +bShowPercent = true; +}

Re: [Libreoffice] Are we back to having this spec process again!?

2011-07-11 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Andre, all, On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:57:34 +0200 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote: Am 09.07.2011 19:39, schrieb Kohei Yoshida: Regarding this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39068 Rainer started the specification process for this. I'd rather say he

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] hyphenation fix

2011-07-11 Thread Andras Timar
Hi László, 2011.07.08. 10:38 keltezéssel, Németh László írta: Hi András, Many thanks for your help. If you don't bother, I send a new patch (1 line) to fix the sometimes bad capitalization in non-standard hyphenation (a few years old, recently recognized bug from me):

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove CREDITS.odt?

2011-07-11 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:24:55 +0100, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: It was planned to create it automatically via a script. For now, I simply run it from time to time on my laptop, creating an .html file which had been manually converted to .odt. Ah - so, we can

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-07-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36443, which changed state. Bug 36443 Summary: Toolbars do not show in LibreOffice Base 3.3.2 (while making a form or a report) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36443 What|Old Value

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Implement new rule for xref to numbered paragraphs

2011-07-11 Thread Troy Rollo
--- sw/inc/numrule.hxx| 10 ++- sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx | 56 ++--- 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/sw/inc/numrule.hxx b/sw/inc/numrule.hxx index 26d0eff..392ac06 100644 --- a/sw/inc/numrule.hxx +++

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Missing localizations of Presenter screen

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Andras Timar píše v Ne 10. 07. 2011 v 20:36 +0200: Hi, Localizations of Presenter screem extension were made but not built in into the final deliverable. This bug was reported last Thursday on l10n list, however, it is not a new one. It is present in all releases of LibreOffice. I don't

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][PUSHED:3-4] Missing localizations of Presenter screen

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Once again with correct subject. Andras Timar píše v Ne 10. 07. 2011 v 20:36 +0200: The hack looks safe. Let's use it for now. The whole stuff will get reworked for GNU make anyway. I have pushed it into the libreoffice-3-4 branch. Best Regards, Petr

[Libreoffice] How to add a unit test?

2011-07-11 Thread Lubos Lunak
Hello, who knows how to add a unit test? http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Unit_Tests is incomplete (what if there is no qa/makefile.mk?) and obsolete (it assumes that this qa/makefile.mk is dmake-based). -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz

Re: [Libreoffice] Are we back to having this spec process again!?

2011-07-11 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:46:08 -0400 Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 11:57 +0200, André Schnabel wrote: All that said: if you can suggest some other word for spec I'd be quite happy. Dennis suggested design notes. I normally call it either feature

[Libreoffice] extensions and templates repository ?

2011-07-11 Thread Caolán McNamara
What's the current status, I mean if people want to help, who or what mailing list to contact ? http://kermit.documentfoundation.org:9089/LibreOffice-Extensions-and-Templates/libreoffice-extensions-center looks ready to roll to me :-) C. ___

Re: [Libreoffice] extensions and templates repository ?

2011-07-11 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Caolán McNamara schrieb: What's the current status, I mean if people want to help, who or what mailing list to contact ? Hello, we have 2 Wiki Pages http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Extensions-website more related to the Plone website and

Re: [Libreoffice] extensions and templates repository ?

2011-07-11 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Caolan, *, Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 17:22:58 schrieb Caolán McNamara: What's the current status, I mean if people want to help, who or what mailing list to contact ? http://kermit.documentfoundation.org:9089/LibreOffice-Extensions-and-Templa tes/libreoffice-extensions-center looks ready

Re: [Libreoffice] extensions and templates repository ?

2011-07-11 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi all, What about this one? http://libreofficeaustralia.org/download/extensions Anyone contacted the authors? They're actually working in the website project? Regards, Júlio. 2011/7/11 Andreas Mantke ma...@gmx.de Hi Caolan, *, Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 17:22:58 schrieb Caolán McNamara:

Re: [Libreoffice] Are we back to having this spec process again!?

2011-07-11 Thread André Schnabel
Hi Kohei, * Am 11.07.2011 15:46, schrieb Kohei Yoshida: On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 11:57 +0200, André Schnabel wrote: All that said: if you can suggest some other word for spec I'd be quite happy. Dennis suggested design notes. I normally call it either feature documentation, feature

Re: [Libreoffice] extensions and templates repository ?

2011-07-11 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Forget what i said... Regards, Júlio. 2011/7/11 Júlio Hoffimann julio.hoffim...@gmail.com Hi all, What about this one? http://libreofficeaustralia.org/download/extensions Anyone contacted the authors? They're actually working in the website project? Regards, Júlio. 2011/7/11 Andreas

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Old X11 code cleanup in libs-gui

2011-07-11 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Michael, On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 08:20 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: If nobody gives me a reason not to in the next days, I plan to remove both the useless #if defined list and the whole XFree section. Patch attached.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Michael Meeks píše v Pá 08. 07. 2011 v 15:27 +0100: Hi Petr, On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:00 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: are you fine with adding the attached changes into master and libreoffice-3-4 branch? So - overall this looks good, particularly if it helps to kill the 'build'

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Miklos Vajna píše v Pá 08. 07. 2011 v 18:33 +0200: On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote: are you fine with adding the attached changes into master and libreoffice-3-4 branch? Sure, it can't really make things worse. :) 6 files changed, 250

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Andreas Radke píše v Pá 08. 07. 2011 v 19:27 +0200: Right now I don't see the need for any of these patches. I have LibO pretty good under control with ArchLinux packaging tools. I'm using make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install and then do some desktop integration that worked automatically in old

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] RTF import patches for 3-4

2011-07-11 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:45:33AM +0100, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi Cedric, On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:06 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Here are two patches to review for the 3.4 branch. I know it's stupid to hack the RTF import filter... but the new one won't be in

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Andreas Radke píše v Ne 10. 07. 2011 v 21:28 +0200: Am Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:10:37 +0200 schrieb Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org: On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:37PM +0200, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: The former man-page is still missing. Did you read Petr's patch?

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Gökçen Eraslan píše v Ne 10. 07. 2011 v 13:53 +0300: 08 Temmuz 2011 Cuma günü (saat 17:00:48) Petr Mladek şunları yazmıştı: Hi, are you fine with adding the attached changes into master and libreoffice-3-4 branch? In the first patch named -L.patch, an absolute-path symlink is created

[Libreoffice] Hackfest agenda

2011-07-11 Thread Florian Effenberger
Dear hackers, although it is still a while until the Hackfest in Munich, due to the summer vacations, we need to plan early and come up with an agenda. I'd like to ask all of the participants to add their desired agenda items to http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest2011#Ideas so

Re: [Libreoffice] Extension-Repository: Need help to solve a Python error

2011-07-11 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 21:14 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote: I don't know yet, how to solve this Python error. I hope someone with Python knowledge could help me at this point. The both files are listed here: http://amantke.de/libreoffice/blobstorage It would have been better to put it up raw

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][PUSHED:3-4] Better support for distro packaging

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 08. 07. 2011 v 16:00 +0200: Hi, are you fine with adding the attached changes into master and libreoffice-3-4 branch? Nobody was really against = I pushed everything except for the SUSE*.conf files. Thanks all reviewers help. Best Regards, Petr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-07-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 32709, which changed state. Bug 32709 Summary: PPT/PPTX created by LibreOffice can't be opened by MS PowerPoint Viewer and MS Office Web Apps https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32709 What|Old

[Libreoffice] Unit tests - cppunit crashing with debug build

2011-07-11 Thread Lubos Lunak
Hello, do the attached patches look ok? With debug build I have unit tests failing because of _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mismatch (our code built with it, cppunit without), leading to CppUnit::Message dtor (not explicitly defined, thus generated by the compiler while compiling the unit test) accessing

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch for Bug 38936

2011-07-11 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Jeffrey, On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 14:28 +0800, jeffrey chang wrote: Hi, Proposed patch for https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38936, Bug 38936. Many different locations for Hori~zontal Ruler, but it seems like only WriterCommands.xcu in officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED] + Cherrypick request for 3.4.2

2011-07-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 17:21 +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote: makes me wonder if we don't want that in our own pie chart implementation rather than in the filter though ... :-) But I picked it for -3-4. Sorry, but I didn't understand this. Did you mean the filter code (oox), please?

Re: [Libreoffice] Unit tests - cppunit crashing with debug build

2011-07-11 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 20:49 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: Hello, do the attached patches look ok? With debug build I have unit tests failing because of _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mismatch (our code built with it, cppunit without), leading to CppUnit::Message dtor (not explicitly defined, thus generated

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Moving misplaced Compatibility options from ScDocOptions to ScAppOptions

2011-07-11 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Albert, nice work but I have some comments. Operator== should have return type bool and not int(I saw that ScDocOptions used int too, but I have changed that already). But all in all I think we shouldn't introduce operator== there. I didn't like the old approach with operator== but after

[Libreoffice] Bug 38831 - [EasyHack] Get rid of SV_DECL_VARARR, SV_DECL_VARARR_PLAIN, SV_DECL_VARARR_SORT ....

2011-07-11 Thread Maciej Rumianowski
Hi, First all you awesome Developers are doing great Software! I would like to help you:) I picked up this bug and tried to get rid of SvULongs. I found for example in ScImportExport::Sylk2Doc and thought it would be good to first write a unit test (since there are unit tests of calc). But I

[Libreoffice] [GSOC] Report #7: Wizards

2011-07-11 Thread Xisco Faulí
Hello there, Here's what i've done this week: - Fix a visualitation problem related to Letter Wizard - Start to work on Agenda Wizard - Talk with Björn about adding the python files into the makefile so we can call it from File Wizards and remove the Java code - a bit of cleaning - Migrate

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for fdo#39023: shared formulas are not imported correctly from xlsx, first part

2011-07-11 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello, this patch solves the problem that shared formulas are not imported correctly from xlsx. The cell containing the shared formula displayed =#Name because the range name that is internally used is global but the formula compiler thought it is local. We have a second independent issue here

[Libreoffice] Errors building Animation

2011-07-11 Thread Joseph Powers
Matus, You removed component_getImplementationEnvironment in your patch 552bb0d5fc2e2d4b0934a9f7f017785962669fbb, While I don't really miss the function, some one seems to. From the looks of things, it appears like we have a list somewhere that insists that the function should be exported.

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-07-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39155