Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50)
Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the
feature-freeze before B1 so we have:
master Beta0 ---\--- crazy stuff ...
\
\- Beta1 --- stabilisation
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:49)
Well - we've fixed a number of the most obvious packaging bugs,
parallel installability etc. etc. in master - so (without further new
problems - of which we expect some up to the freeze) Beta1 will be
rather better.
It's more realistic to expect
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-12-11 08:42)
Shit happens, now the question is how we will go on.
As posted already yesterday, it is not unlikely that beta1 will have
about the same troubles. If so, those will be fixed before beta2, which
will make that version fine for larger
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50)
Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the
feature-freeze before B1 so we have:
master Beta0 ---\--- crazy stuff ...
\
\- Beta1 --- stabilisation
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:49)
Well - we've fixed a number of the most obvious packaging bugs,
parallel installability etc. etc. in master - so (without further new
problems - of which we expect some up to the freeze) Beta1 will be
rather better.
It's more realistic to expect
Bug 43458 - LibreOffice does not start with a second monitor connected
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Michael Meeks wrote (02-12-11 11:35)
It is in a bit of a state it seems :-) anyhow - lots of bugs in our
release process found/fixed before B1 which is good. I wonder how widely
we should be announcing B0 - in the state that is in though.
I agree with that. It's great to have the
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (02-12-11 16:30)
I would decide about the bug-hunting party when we have, the feature
complete, beta1 in hands and see how it looks like.
Indeed, after the discussion today it's obvious that we must wait until
we know that the beta1 is OK for such a larger test.
Arno Teigseth wrote (02-12-11 21:55)
Don't want to hijack anything, but wonder if wine program-LO
clipboard behaviour is related to this?
When I copy stuff from from programs in wine and later paste them into
writer with Ctrl+V, the paste is happening at _the end of_ the
document (not where
Thorsten Behrens wrote (02-12-11 10:25)
Builds are now being uploaded to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't
spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab
them here:
So it's probably better not to twitter right now :-)
I plan some info today about the testing of the
Michael Meeks wrote (02-12-11 11:35)
It is in a bit of a state it seems :-) anyhow - lots of bugs in our
release process found/fixed before B1 which is good. I wonder how widely
we should be announcing B0 - in the state that is in though.
I agree with that. It's great to have the
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (02-12-11 16:30)
I would decide about the bug-hunting party when we have, the feature
complete, beta1 in hands and see how it looks like.
Indeed, after the discussion today it's obvious that we must wait until
we know that the beta1 is OK for such a larger test.
Michael Meeks wrote (01-12-11 17:21)
* QA Update (Rainer)
+ Cor to organise a bug-hunting session for B1 next weekend.
Working to get some support :-)
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi Alex,
Alex Thurgood wrote (01-12-11 23:05)
As from today, my build from master when launched from a terminal starts
in the background and does not receive focus. The desktop is Gnome
classic desktop with Ubuntu 11.10.
My build from yesterday evening (Build ID: 93acae3-090bcba-45cf606)
Alex Thurgood wrote (01-12-11 23:08)
Ok, something weird is going on (possibly on my machine). It only starts
up like that the very first time after build completion. All subsequent
starts bring the app main window to the foreground.
First time it doesn't start completely for me.
This is
Hi Othman,
othman wrote (30-11-11 11:51)
i gave you the oxt demo , the SWT source code etc..it is you who are not
[...]
There is a grey area ... sometimes it's not always easy for
non-developers to help, provide useful information, on the other hand
devs do give a lot of support to help
Hi,
Up until recently I could change the product-name in the title bar of
the window via this file: share/registry/brand.xcd prop oooname
Is there another route now?
The least I like to have this for, is that I can easily see in the title
bar, in which of the various versions that often
Regina Henschel wrote (30-11-11 23:23)
It is in share/registry/main.xcd
Thanks Regina!
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Caolán,
Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 17:47)
I could build like that. But won't be soon, prolly.
Do I just have to give another command, or have to change smthng in an
ini/setting?
additional --enable-symbols to autogen.sh. Need to rebuild at least vcl,
i.e. cd vcl; make -sr clean; make
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
I have added QA and devel mailing lists into CC. We should not cook such
an important event in background.
Agreed - that is why I started at the list initially of course ;-)
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 00:06 +0100:
Is it OK for you if I
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 16:42)
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 15:34 +0100:
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
Another problem is that we still have only few testcases. We need to
create more. We still could do it during the test phase.
Any helping hands are welcome.
I
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (29-11-11 11:54)
I have added QA and devel mailing lists into CC. We should not cook such
an important event in background.
Agreed - that is why I started at the list initially of course ;-)
Cor Nouws píše v Út 29. 11. 2011 v 00:06 +0100:
Is it OK for you if I
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek wrote (23-11-11 10:28)
All in all I would say it is needed to organise these events..
I fully agree. I was just a bit scared by Cor's mail. It made me feel
that Janury 21 would be the only day when people should test LO-3.5. I
am happy to hear that it is not true. :-)
Hi Michael, Rainer*,
Hmm, AFAICR, I'm not a frequent participant of the calls ;-)
And tomorrow I'll be busy all day training people with Writer.
So short two items via mail:
- FYI: I have posted a proposal for some QA actions
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote (22-11-11 08:54)
Do you need to tell make install where to install it to (looks like it
uses /usr/local/lib as default prefix, maybe we accept a --prefix
configure switch?).
Hmm, I just looked again. And it looks as if I was confused and should
have run
Stephan Bergmann wrote (22-11-11 09:23)
You have a computer terminal in your bathroom? What a nerd you are. ;)
Well, close to. But I resist giving more detials ;-)
Anyway, confusing install vs. dev-install looks like a plausible
explanation.
make dev-install ran fine.
But alas the
Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 13:32)
lets get a backtrace there, i.e.
. ./ooenv
gdb --args ./soffice.bin
(gdb) run
(gdb) bt
Starting program:
/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread
Caolán McNamara wrote (22-11-11 15:25)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb309b4f3 in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution(long, long) ()
Hmm, pity it isn't an --enable-symbols build which would give line
numbers.
I could build like that. But won't be soon, prolly.
Do I just
Italo Vignoli wrote (18-11-11 10:40)
Can I get a contact from this company? We need such statements, and I
would be happy to get a quotation from these guys to use in a press
release, or to write a case study about their implementation.
Of course - he's willing to help.
Send it to you direct,
Michael Stahl wrote (19-11-11 18:18)
So for the release notes something as follows would be appropriate:
In LibreOffice 3.5 a new stronger encryption will be introduced. As
am not sure stronger is appropriate here, AFAIK the main motivation
for the change was that the new algorithm (AES) is
Hi Phillip,
Philipp Weissenbacher wrote (21-11-11 12:48)
I took a quick look at your patch and found these minor things:
Thanks :-)
Line 95: Create an intance of the implementation class, enable the
page numbering by default
There's a typo (intance - instance) and in German text it says
Cor Nouws wrote (21-11-11 13:17)
(NB, I think I saw a comment somewhere, that display of date/time have
been completely disabled .. shall look if I can find that again)
Indeed, line 426 in svx/source/stbctrls/pszctrl.cxx
// Empty display if neither size nor table position are available
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (21-11-11 13:46)
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 12:05 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
In LibreOffice 3.5 a different, more often used encryption will be
introduced. ...
It'd be great if that final text ended up at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org
Michael Meeks wrote (21-11-11 15:37)
Always the way :-)
Nasty guys here ;-)
Ah I was asking if you wanted a company name: CorNouwsInc. or somesuch
against your changes.
That is what I understood, yes.
So where should I do what to add NouOff (www.nouenoff.nl) ?
--
- Cor
Hi Kendy :-)
Jan Holesovsky wrote (21-11-11 16:25)
The problem with docking them there is that if you let the behavior as
it is now (pop-up when you are in the bullet list / table / etc., and
disappear when you leave that), then your document will be jumping left
and right, which would be
Thorsten Behrens wrote (21-11-11 17:48)
Use RDF for what it's been designed for, craft extensibility into
ODF via other means.
Wasn't it a possibility to save data that is not likely to become
regular part of ODF in the end (hmm, would you want to have smthing like
that in your office-app
Hi August,
August Sodora wrote (22-11-11 03:29)
cd into each of those directories and run build manually and they
all turn out ok; then you can go back and run make in the root
yes, that is what I did, and described, maybe not clear enough.
I just wanted to let the devs know where it was.
after the make, make install runs fine for some time but finishes with
these last lines:
Entering /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/instsetoo_native/util
dmake: makefile.mk: line 239: Warning: -- Prior to dmake 4.5 only one
%-target per target-definition worked reliably. Check your makefiles.
Cor Nouws wrote (22-11-11 07:06)
And indeed, I cannot start the programm in the following way, that I was
able before:
cd /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/install/program
. ./ooenv
./soffice.bin
something wrong in make install or new methodology?
Of course this info:
cono@cono-tm-new:~/src/git
Hi Drew, *,
drew wrote (06-11-11 19:21)
Well, I'll toss in my observations - which assuming I'm doing this
correctly might point more to a problem, if there is one, withing the
deb packages.
Thanks for confirming that it's fine with the rpm package.
Do others use the *deb* packages from the
Hi all,
Cor Nouws wrote (19-11-11 16:56)
A test-event, was one of the ideas from the presentation (1), slide #24
Time is running fast, and since the developers (reading the most recent
report of the ESC) did their bits to help us with better QA, I would
like to take a more comprehensive
Hi JB,
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (21-11-11 11:21)
Do others use the *deb* packages from the daily build?
Yes, me (x86 on my professional machine) but only in English. ;-)
Language would not be the problem.
I have continuous troubles when I use parallel install (1) the daily
builds. Not
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Noack wrote (21-11-11 22:00)
A very first step (an initial cheap solution) might be to add another
side pane which can accommodate the today's toolbars. If this toolbar is
visible / accessible all the time, no need for a jumping document -
quite the contrary, since the
[ forwarded this to the users list ]
Kees Kriek wrote (20-11-11 13:29)
When I use a cross reference in Writer to for example another item, the
[...]
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi all,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (19-11-11 03:32)
On 2011-11-18 at 23:56 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
* When we've presented some proposals within the OOo Renaissance
project, people mentioned that vertical space is valuable due
to widescreen displays.
So what about
Stephan Bergmann wrote (18-11-11 15:27)
On 11/18/2011 02:21 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
So I have to interpret it as:
an encrypted document from 3.5 opened in 3.4 will be saved
with the old encryption, without notice?
Yes. Sorry for my unclear muttering.
No probs - we are at it now. ;-)
So
Cor Nouws wrote (13-11-11 21:20)
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
I'm afraid Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier will be
the critical/limiting condition.
[...]
You are perfectly right
Cor Nouws wrote (18-11-11 18:57)
The second day:
Presentations available here
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Events#Europe
(row with ODF Plugfest - obviously)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:37:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translation of German comments
---
svx/source/stbctrls/pszctrl.cxx | 103 +++---
svx/source/stbctrls/stbctrls.src | 14 +++---
svx/source/stbctrls
Cor Nouws wrote (13-11-11 21:20)
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
I'm afraid Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier will be
the critical/limiting condition.
[...]
You are perfectly right
Hi all,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (19-11-11 03:32)
On 2011-11-18 at 23:56 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
* When we've presented some proposals within the OOo Renaissance
project, people mentioned that vertical space is valuable due
to widescreen displays.
So what about
Hi all,
report from first day (=yesterday)
(In the train now on my way for the second one)
Two tracks
- - - - - -
This ODF plugfest is organised roughly in two tracks:
- international, where the ODF supporting office programs exchange;
- national, where Dutch and Belgium firms that have
Cor Nouws wrote (18-11-11 10:00)
report from first day (=yesterday)
Should have included this link:
http://plugtest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=plugfests:20_gouda:info
And - before I forget it in my next report: kudos for the people
organising the event. Great work!
--
- Cor
Michael Meeks wrote (18-11-11 10:41)
This beta0 also has the side-effect of making Cor unbelievably happy -
right Cor ? :-)
Ah, most appreciated.
This just as a quick first reply, since I see my name.
Might take some time ( :-\ ) before I can react more in detail. (There
is some
Stephan Bergmann wrote (18-11-11 11:28)
On 11/17/2011 10:37 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Stephan Bergmann wrote (17-11-11 09:02)
On 11/11/2011 11:12 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Is included in the patch, that when a encrypted document is opened in
3.4.n and saved again, people are informed about the change
Michael Meeks wrote (18-11-11 16:15)
Hi Tim,
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:38 +0100, Tim Hardeck wrote:
this one-liner should prevent the Impress Wizard from getting started
automatically. The assistant should now only appear if
File - Wizards - Presentation is used.
Compared to the current
Michael Meeks wrote (18-11-11 16:54)
Cor - you didn't tell us if you thought this was a good default; so far
Astron agrees, and Tim of course ;-)
The Wizard is extremely helpful, when you want to have it.
So yes, I support a change in behaviour.
Either turning the default off, or the
Cor Nouws wrote (18-11-11 10:04)
http://plugtest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=plugfests:20_gouda:info
The second day:
- There is a lot of good work presented at the plugfest.
All kind of applications supporting ODF, and also offering partly
support in the browser, on iOS, Android
Christoph Noack wrote (18-11-11 22:01)
Well, I think I don't get everything from the technical description,
With the patch, initially the pop-up-behaving toolbars are docked above
the status bar.
so I really have to try. At the moment, I'm thinking about stuff like
potentially increased
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote (17-11-11 09:02)
On 11/11/2011 11:12 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Is included in the patch, that when a encrypted document is opened in
3.4.n and saved again, people are informed about the change in
encryption?
No.
I see. When you modify and save an encrypted
Hi Tim,
Tim Hardeck wrote (17-11-11 17:07)
On 11/17/2011 04:00 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Tim Hardeck wrote (16-11-11 20:12)
With this patch these toolbars should be docked to the bottom to prevent
the document from being moved each time the toolbar is displayed.
Could you please explain a bit
Hi Tim,
Tim Hardeck wrote (17-11-11 17:07)
On 11/17/2011 04:00 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Tim Hardeck wrote (16-11-11 20:12)
With this patch these toolbars should be docked to the bottom to prevent
the document from being moved each time the toolbar is displayed.
Could you please explain a bit
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (16-11-11 10:59)
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:17 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Still some time from now ...but next Saturday there will be the next
HackerEvent we have in Netherlands/Flanders.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NL/bijeenkomst_11-11-19
Cool
Hi guys,
Still some time from now ...but next Saturday there will be the next
HackerEvent we have in Netherlands/Flanders.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NL/bijeenkomst_11-11-19
If some really experienced hackers have time to lurk on IRC now and
then, that would be rather convenient when
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-11-11 20:06)
I'm afraid Try to get more testers doing the testing earlier will be
the critical/limiting condition.
[...]
You are perfectly right there!
(This information was contained in the slides that I did not include in
the version linked from that
Hi *,
As a final action for the past week, I just posted the presentation on
easy hacking LibreOffice that I gave at T-Dose, the Saturday before. See:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Material#Presentation
Please reuse and extend :-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote (11-11-11 10:50)
is a patch (actually, four separate patches for the components,
lib-core, lib-gui, and ure repos) to backport support for reading (but
not writing) AES-encrypted ODF 1.2 documents to libreoffice-3-4.
Is included in the patch, that when a
Hi,
As a result of the discussions, the presentation, at the LibOCon, here
are the conclusions.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
and the places where people can comment and show commitment.
What do you think?
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
August Sodora wrote (11-11-11 17:30)
Of course :-) I was looking at the stuff in cui for adding an option
somewhere, is that the correct place to be looking? Also I'm not sure
if the basic ide deserves its own entire category for options yet as I
think this is the first configurable thing about
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida wrote (09-11-11 03:25)
There isn't a formally filed bug for this (either that or there is and I
don't know about it), but this one is pretty bad I want this fixed in
the stable version. The fix is
There was some discussion on the users list on a at least related
Hi Stephan,
So, I think I will just introduce a new LibreOffice-minimal-version
dependency after all.
I hand this subject in my mind for some time. Simply because I provide
some extensions that now have a OpenOffice.org-minimal-version value and
I was wondering how long that will last.
a.
Hi Petr, Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (08-11-11 20:17)
3. Query last two days:
Of course it's also interesting to see the latest activities, but of
course all bugs without review deserve attention
When the idea is to make it extra attractive for people to look at bugs,
it might be that
Hi all,
Thanks for looking at this.
Not too much time ATM, so just two short notes:
Christian Lohmaier wrote (07-11-11 13:10)
You only need to go through manual unpacking or rebasing procedures
when trying to install different versions of the same flavor, i.e.
when installing multiple
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (07-11-11 16:03)
I have about 20+ versions - time to delete some, but then still, I have
many versions in parallel. Just to be able to check in various versions
of 3.3.x of 3.4.x of my own build, of daily builds..
Besides, I some 8 older OOo versions.
Hi Michael,
Michael Stahl wrote (07-11-11 18:05)
1. there used to be a user-install script which could install the RPMs
as created in instsetoo_native not in the system, but in some path given
as parameter (even on Debian), and patch it to use a user installation
also in that directory; have
Christian Lohmaier wrote (07-11-11 18:16)
Hi Cor, *,
(that * needs a reply-all ;-) )
As the rpms are relocatable, you could actually install them using the
relocate switch and then only adapt the userconfig path (or launch it
with -env:UserInstallation=$(file-URL) to set it on the
Michael Meeks wrote (07-11-11 17:22)
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:17 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Heh - so, I'd be inclined to recommend installing the packages, and
then moving the results away to somewhere else - that may turn out to be
rather more reliable [but will break system integration
Hi,
This is no list for add-on /extensions questions (1)
However..
othman wrote (27-10-11 23:15)
what java code should i add to dynamically relaod addon toolbar or relaod
the whole Addon context?
Presumably there will be a whole representation of the configuration in
memory. I would be
Hi Cedric,
The complex point isn't on the UX side now... the whole default styles
thing is hard-coded ATM and uses some xcu configuration. I'll need to
get rid of this before having a default template. And even when we'll be
ready to ship a default template, we don't need to wait to UX: it's
Hi Nicholas,
Permanent Box wrote (21-10-11 07:36)
The link provided is a big system, its overwhelming and I may be too new
to be at the developer's level.
May I know the directions to take on creating extensions?
If I were you, I would try to start at the
'old' place:
Hi Cedric,
This option page does exactly the same than changing the values in the
style directly.
Yes..
In a not-so-far future, I'ld like to have this all
configured through a default template instead of what we have...
Ah, more new to come :-)
and removing that option page is on the way
Michael Meeks wrote (19-10-11 17:19)
Let me take it to ux-advise :-)
Good idea :-)
Maybe related to Cedrics default-template implementation: a way to
easily choose another template ('style sheet') - this in contrast to the
current way of importing styles via the function in the
Michael Meeks wrote (19-10-11 17:19)
Let me take it to ux-advise :-)
Good idea :-)
Maybe related to Cedrics default-template implementation: a way to
easily choose another template ('style sheet') - this in contrast to the
current way of importing styles via the function in the
Hi Cédric,
Interest caught by your presentation in Paris, I saw your patch in cgit:
359d0fbd03a68d9131e8fb25e7dac9f19ddf6dcb
I understand the idea to remove default paragraph styles such as list,
list1, list1 cntd, list2 end etc etc
But I do not understand what the link is with removing the
Hi,
After new pull and make clean, the same error ...
Cor Nouws wrote (10-10-11 20:07)
rerunning build in xpdf: log for /home/cono/src/git/libo_core/xpdf
dmake: makefile.mk: line 39: Error: -- Include file settings.mk, not found
after rerunning in openssl about the same error: makefile.mk
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (11-10-11 06:36)
I will no be there and am not involved into any preparations, so I do
not know what we are talking about. Unfortunately this and next week my
job only will leave few time for LibO activity.
Sorry to hear that you'll not be there.
I just was
Hi Michael, Rainer,
Doing some preparations for Paris, I see there is a discrepancy between
the program on the website and the one in the spreadsheet, that can be
downloaded.
The website mentions Michael to do the QA session on Friday morning.
The spreadsheet mentions me.
I did not apply - I
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (10-10-11 22:15)
Looks like you're in charge :-) and/or you had a great list of
questions.
:-)
This is your chance to discuss this, you've been concerned about it for
a while, and we havn't managed to get to it. I'd really like to
understand
Michael Meeks wrote (07-10-11 22:29)
So - it's rather beyond me. Can you run:
(for a in *.rpm; do rpm -qlp $a; done) /tmp/rpm-log
from wherever you have the downloaded packages, and check the log ?
I downloaded
Cor Nouws wrote (06-10-11 17:52)
Now some more fun :-D
I installed as followes:
- unpacked and ran dpkg-deb in a tmp folder
- moved the whole opt to ~/path
- changed bootstraprc:
~/LibreOffice/master20111003/lo-dev/program$ emacs bootstraprc
$SYSUSERCONFIG/libreoffice/35master111003
(what I
Stephan Bergmann wrote (07-10-11 22:46)
On 10/07/2011 10:29 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
which is odd. Though much later than the other files - I assume you
copied it in manually ? the scp2 looks fine in master:
see Cor's (mind! I did copy oosplash to it)
;-) Thanks !
--
- Cor
-
(from location)
hi,
donwloaded and installed master-2011-10-03_13.33.17_li etc x86 this morning.
On starting, error as per subject.
Regards,
Cor
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
What fun :-) is there an 'oosplash' binary in the program/ directory ?
my build puts one there.
ls oo*
No such file or folder...
Ciao-
Cor
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Cor Nouws wrote (06-10-11 15:47)
What fun :-) is there an 'oosplash' binary in the program/ directory ?
my build puts one there.
ls oo*
No such file or folder...
of course copying from an other installation makes the office run...
Now some more fun :-D
I installed
Michael Meeks wrote (06-10-11 17:02)
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 15:47 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
What fun :-) is there an 'oosplash' binary in the program/ directory ?
my build puts one there.
ls oo*
No such file or folder...
Fun - what is in there ? can you attach a file
Hi,
I've seen an invitation for that ODF plugfest.
Anyone planning to be there?
Because of the distance, I could attend easily. At least partly.
However, because of the content, others might be more in place there..
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Olivier Hallot wrote (30-09-11 01:09)
These are great news indeed!
Congratulations to all the team!
+1
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Arianne,
Arianne Valdes Alvarez wrote (28-09-11 03:53)
I'm studying how to convert an csv file to ods file.
[...]
This list is for developer issues. See.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
For (all kind of) user questions, please see the Support tab on the website.
Cor Nouws wrote (28-09-11 06:45)
For (all kind of) user questions, please see the Support tab on the
website.
Having connection with the website right now:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Hi Cedric,
cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr wrote (27-09-11 22:40)
Regina (IIRC) mentioned break before or after. And currently, we
only have before, AFAIAA. Hence my remark. (But don't get me wrong:
I do not ask for a new feature here!)
We can have page break after in the Text Flow tab... so I
601 - 700 of 888 matches
Mail list logo
