Il giorno 07/dic/2011 10:13, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com ha scritto:
You seem to be taking the complaints about Beta/Alpha personally.
[snip]
If this situation happened is because we all failed.
I totally agree with Pedro. I am sure that each one of us is doing his best
for the success of
Cor Nouws píše v Út 06. 12. 2011 v 21:12 +0100:
Michael Stahl wrote (06-12-11 13:20)
On 03/12/11 18:27, Cor Nouws wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50)
Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the
feature-freeze before B1 so we have:
master Beta0
Hi Petr, *
It was not intended for wide functional testing. It helped to find
exactly the problems that it was supposed to find.
It is clear that we should have used the name alphaX. Well, the plan
was public and nobody protested against the beta0 name ;-)
You seem to be taking the
Michael Stahl wrote (06-12-11 13:20)
On 03/12/11 18:27, Cor Nouws wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50)
Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the
feature-freeze before B1 so we have:
master Beta0 ---\--- crazy stuff ...
Cor Nouws píše v So 03. 12. 2011 v 18:23 +0100:
Pedro Lino wrote (03-12-11 11:23)
I hope that _at least_ they make DAMN sure that Beta1 doesn't
overwrite the stable build...
To be honest: I have no idea. I just install zillions (well, little less
;-) ) without system integration.
But
We plan to do the beta builds as dev builds, so they will be installed
in parallel with the stable release.
Excellent news!
Is this going to be included on the first Public Beta which is
scheduled for today?
Though, the release candidates are going to replace the stable releases
on Windows
Pedro Lino píše v Po 05. 12. 2011 v 09:48 +:
We plan to do the beta builds as dev builds, so they will be installed
in parallel with the stable release.
Excellent news!
Is this going to be included on the first Public Beta which is
scheduled for today?
Yes, beta1 will be dev-build
Cor Nouws píše v So 03. 12. 2011 v 18:27 +0100:
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50)
Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the
feature-freeze before B1 so we have:
master Beta0 ---\--- crazy stuff ...
\
On 12/5/11 2:36 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
I would prefer to keep it as is. In each case, I do not feel like
deciding about this myself.
I think that we can stick to Beta 1, although I feel that there would be
less misunderstandings by using Alpha (for instance, FileHippo has
distributed Beta 0
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Cor Nouws píše v So 03. 12. 2011 v 18:23 +0100:
Pedro Lino wrote (03-12-11 11:23)
I hope that _at least_ they make DAMN sure that Beta1 doesn't
overwrite the stable build...
To be honest: I have no idea. I just install
Italo Vignoli wrote (06-12-11 01:44)
If we stick to Beta 1, though, we should make it VERY clear on the
accompanying message that this is a Beta intended to help developers,
because advanced users can install it to test features and discover
bugs.
[...]
Yes, the communication has to be clear
Cor Nouws schrieb:
AFAIAC, no need to say sorry for that. It's part of our work that we
carry that happily, isn't it, Rainer ;-)
Hi,
Yes! I did not want to blame anyone, I only regretted our mishap to
catch one of the worse ones of the Source stages of development. And for
me Cor's idea
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-12-11 08:42)
Shit happens, now the question is how we will go on.
As posted already yesterday, it is not unlikely that beta1 will have
about the same troubles. If so, those will be fixed before beta2, which
will make that version fine for larger
Hi Rainer,
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 08:42 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
it's a disaster, completely unusable ! Quality of Beta0 is far behind
quality of Master during the last weeks, it seems that we were not lucky
with the time where the tag has been created
Quite quite :-) so Beta1
Pedro Lino wrote (03-12-11 11:23)
I hope that _at least_ they make DAMN sure that Beta1 doesn't
overwrite the stable build...
To be honest: I have no idea. I just install zillions (well, little less
;-) ) without system integration.
But your question is relevant indeed.
Anyone else?
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50)
Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the
feature-freeze before B1 so we have:
master Beta0 ---\--- crazy stuff ...
\
\- Beta1 --- stabilisation
Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:49)
Well - we've fixed a number of the most obvious packaging bugs,
parallel installability etc. etc. in master - so (without further new
problems - of which we expect some up to the freeze) Beta1 will be
rather better.
It's more realistic to expect
On 12/3/11 6:27 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Will be something that marketing is going to praise us for, isn't it?
If the change of code name is not a problem, it would make thing easier
for everyone.
--
Italo Vignoli - italo.vign...@gmail.com
mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316...@messagenet.it
skype
18 matches
Mail list logo
