Re: [Libreoffice] URE incompatibility?

2010-11-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:50:40PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Maybe sb did that quite a while ago, see c37c9bf77d3ae02fb14b1d053e8c249a584f5e00 of jvmaccess/util/gcc3.map ? Is that it ? Maybe, but that commit message doesn't explain why those versions are gone (and from reading

[Libreoffice] URE incompatibility?

2010-11-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, did we (intentionally? not intentionally?) break URE compatibility in LibO 3.3 beta 2 (or earlier)? See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603538 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603549 Grüße/Regards, René ___

Re: [Libreoffice] URE incompatibility?

2010-11-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:40:37AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 11:40 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, did we (intentionally? not intentionally?) break URE compatibility in LibO 3.3 beta 2 (or earlier)? See

Re: [Libreoffice] URE incompatibility?

2010-11-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:50 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: but is that also the case for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603538? Dunno, doubt it. Do you have the build logs for that version ? C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] URE incompatibility?

2010-11-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:02:08PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:50 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: but is that also the case for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603538? Dunno, doubt it. Do you have the build logs for that version ? You mean for OOo