[Libreoffice] smoketest build split

2011-12-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, I packaged smoketest[*] because it made sense to run it even on installed systems. Unfortunately, the smoketestoo_native module did 3 things together. It built the stuff, installed LO, and ran the tests. I needed to split it into two modules: + smoketest - new module that builds and

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-07-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 20:46 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: Greetings, I configured with options --disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-debug --enable-dbgutil --enable-crashdump --without-junit and `make` seemed to complete normally,

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-07-26 Thread Terrence Enger
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:02 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 20:46 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: (snip) Will the smoketest survive a raised assertion? Hmm, it depends. In indeed might be failing on a debug-only assertion. I do run it in --enable-dbgutil mode but not

[Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-07-25 Thread Terrence Enger
Greetings, I configured with options --disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-debug --enable-dbgutil --enable-crashdump --without-junit and `make` seemed to complete normally, although I did notice warnings going by. Now, `make dev-install` or

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fail, N12_GLOBAL__N_14TestE::test

2011-05-31 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 08:22 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, in smoketestoo_native, I've got this : officeconnection.cxx:140:Assertion Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_14TestE::test setUp() failed - equality assertion failed - Expected: 2 - Actual : 0 So I used export DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE to

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fail, N12_GLOBAL__N_14TestE::test

2011-05-31 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Tue, 31 May 2011 08:22:46 +0200 Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: in smoketestoo_native, I've got this : officeconnection.cxx:140:Assertion Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_14TestE::test setUp() failed - equality assertion failed - Expected: 2 - Actual : 0 That assert waits one second

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-05-27 Thread Christian Dywan
Am Thu, 26 May 2011 13:44:12 +0100 schrieb Caolán McNamara: On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 13:30 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote: Am Thu, 26 May 2011 09:51:45 +0100 schrieb Caolán McNamara: Still broken for me. I did remove smoketestoo_native/unxlngx6.pro but no difference. Presumably

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-05-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 23:08 +0200, Pim Bollen wrote: [Java framework] The JRE specified by the bootstrap variable UNO_JAVA_JFW_JREHOME or UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME could not be recognized. Check the values and make sure that you use a plug-in library that can recognize that JRE. javaldx

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-05-26 Thread Christian Dywan
Am Thu, 26 May 2011 09:51:45 +0100 schrieb Caolán McNamara: On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 23:08 +0200, Pim Bollen wrote: [Java framework] The JRE specified by the bootstrap variable UNO_JAVA_JFW_JREHOME or UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME could not be recognized. Check the values and make sure that

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-05-26 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 13:30 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote: Am Thu, 26 May 2011 09:51:45 +0100 schrieb Caolán McNamara: Still broken for me. I did remove smoketestoo_native/unxlngx6.pro but no difference. Presumably 6eae40f7a1dfbd5 in bootstrap was the commit supposed to fix it? That one

[Libreoffice] smoketest fails

2011-05-25 Thread Pim Bollen
When I run make check the smoketest fails. What to do next ? I tried to google for this, and it seems to point to a java problem, but I still don't know what to do next. Some info: This build is on a openSUSE 11.3 system. gandalf:~/git/libo/ java -version java version 1.6.0_20 OpenJDK Runtime

[Libreoffice] smoketest now works (i.e. green) with a11y enabled and --enable-dbgutil

2011-04-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
And it was tricky to try and fix draw's a11y stuff, i.e. it suffered from calling methods in a base class ctor which triggered calling virtual methods on the object while not complete constructed yet, falling into the classic c++ problem where during construction that calls the *base* class

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 01:55 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: - I suppose we want to get rid of unpacking of the installation sets for smoketest, and instead use ooinstall directly ;-) This used to work - I wrote the patch myself ;-) having said that it used (AFAIR) the same pass

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-11 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 01:55 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Norbert, Caolán McNamara píše v Po 08. 11. 2010 v 13:47 +: There is some improvement on the smoketest front It run pass many more tests.. but still do not finish: The smoketest passes every time for me. FWIW

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Norbert, Caolán McNamara píše v Po 08. 11. 2010 v 13:47 +: There is some improvement on the smoketest front It run pass many more tests.. but still do not finish: The smoketest passes every time for me. FWIW # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-10 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi I also get some Java crashes randomly running regcomp, since OOo 3.3rc2. 3.2 was fine so there has to be a change somewhere. On (2010-11-11 01:55), Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Norbert, Caolán McNamara píše v Po 08. 11. 2010 v 13:47 +: There is some improvement on the smoketest front

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 10:13 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: There is some improvement on the smoketest front It run pass many more tests.. but still do not finish: The smoketest passes every time for me. FWIW # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV

[Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
There is some improvement on the smoketest front It run pass many more tests.. but still do not finish: dir -p ./unxlngx6.pro/misc/smoketest/user :

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 17:07 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: /lo/ref/rawbuild/solver/330/unxlngx6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice: Isn't really useful to just get it crashed, so... in solenv/inc/settings.mk add gdb --args after AUGMENT_LIBRARY_PATH_LOCAL in the CPPUNITTESTER line run build

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:39 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I have a segfault

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-25 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I have a segfault running smoketest. Its cold comfort, but smoketest works for me ok. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I have a segfault running smoketest. Its cold comfort, but smoketest works for me ok. can you post the ./bin/g log of where you are at (and mybe your autogen