On 01/29/2013 08:33 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
On 01/28/2013 09:00 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
On 01/28/2013 02:22 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 27/01/13 22:55, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
building is now stuck at
[build LNK] Library/libmysqllo.so
with
undefined reference to 'typeinfo for
On 01/28/2013 09:00 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
On 01/28/2013 02:22 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 27/01/13 22:55, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
Dear all,
As described in the mailing-list-thread
Issues building LibreOffice 4.0.0.1
On 01/27/2013 10:55 PM, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
Are we using SimpleReferenceObject correctly?
In particular, maybe we should define
~SimpleReferenceObject
in all subclasses ?
We are using that class correctly. For subclasses that do not
explicitly declare a destructor, the compiler
On 27/01/13 22:55, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
Dear all,
As described in the mailing-list-thread
Issues building LibreOffice 4.0.0.1
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-January/044838.html
I am trying to build and package LibreOffice 4.0.0.* for KaarPux
On 01/28/2013 02:22 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 27/01/13 22:55, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
Dear all,
As described in the mailing-list-thread
Issues building LibreOffice 4.0.0.1
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-January/044838.html
I am trying to build and package
DOES implement
~SimpleReferenceObject
as
~OFormLayerXMLImport()
As I am certainly no C++ expert, please allow me to ask this
question to the list:
Are we using SimpleReferenceObject correctly?
In particular, maybe we should define
~SimpleReferenceObject
in all subclasses ?
Thanks in advance
