On 08.09.2011 02:40, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose that to be perfect that should bu tuck under
gb_LinkTarget_use_Mesa in RepositoryExternal.mk to properly deal with
the case when using system-mesa vs
I've had some success with the attached modifed version of you patch
Norbert
mesa.modified.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had some success with the attached modifed version of you patch
btw Peter,
I ran a quick test on a Linux box that has SYSTEM_MESA_HEADERS=NO ..
it would be nice to test that the case SYSTEM_MESA_HEADER=YES is not
On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote:
This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd
appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look.
Thanks,
Peter
hi Peter,
looks good, didn't know we have such a simple module :)
only thing missing is that
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michael Stahl m...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote:
This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd
appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look.
Thanks,
Peter
hi Peter,
looks good,
ok, fits in better with the other RepositoryFoo.mk stuff.
but why not just RepositoryModule.mk?
Some hope/anticipation that there may be more than one product sharing
the same spaces ? not sure...
I have never fully understood why we have these Repository*.mk files
in the top directory at
On 07.09.2011 22:40, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
ok, fits in better with the other RepositoryFoo.mk stuff.
but why not just RepositoryModule.mk?
Some hope/anticipation that there may be more than one product sharing
the same spaces ? not sure...
I have never fully understood why we have these
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ?
$(call gb_Library_get_headers_target,libthatneedsmesa) : \
$(call gb_Package_get_target,Mesa_inc)
Of course, we could create a new name for that, but
On 07.09.2011 22:32, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michael Stahl m...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote:
This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd
appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look.
argh... bjorn use of gmane screw-up my reply-all thing...
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ?
$(call gb_Library_get_headers_target,libthatneedsmesa) : \
$(call gb_Package_get_target,Mesa_inc)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ?
$(call
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose that to be perfect that should bu tuck under
gb_LinkTarget_use_Mesa in RepositoryExternal.mk to properly deal with
the case when using system-mesa vs internal-mesa...
and then just add Mesa to the list of
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:21 -0500
Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder would that work dep wise to just
14 matches
Mail list logo
