All of my past future contributions to LibreOffice may be
licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
--- Comment #4 from Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com 2012-08-14 14:03:13
UTC ---
Dear bug submitter!
Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within
the last six months, we close all of these bugs.
To keep this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
--- Comment #6 from Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com 2012-08-14 14:09:53
UTC ---
Dear bug submitter!
Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within
the last six months, we close all of these bugs.
To keep this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52556
Bug #: 52556
Summary: : Automatic correction in french for negation, when
ne is missing : subject rewritten.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 3.6.0.2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52556
RedGuff doms...@yahoo.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #64750|Screensot of step 4.|Screenshot of step 4.
Hi,
All my current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project
are done under MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+.
Until further notice, all my future contributions to the LibreOffice
project are available under MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+.
Attila Hegedus
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:15:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fdo#50087 fix RTF import of Title, Subject, Comments
document properties
Change-Id: I3358fad4949c2c21ecf63983a36b7c8428df9f06
---
writerfilter/source/rtftok/rtfdocumentimpl.cxx | 18 ++
writerfilter/source/rtftok
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:32 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Hi,
See
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=629001d
Regression from 3.4; backported patch attached.
Looks sane, pushed to 3-5
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50087
Bug #: 50087
Summary: FILEOPEN properties Title, Subject, Comments
(FileProperties .. Description) no longer imported
in rtf document
Classification: Unclassified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50087
Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50087
Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|49683 |
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50087
Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |vmik...@suse.cz
--
*NILESH GUPTA*
B.Tech, III year
Electrical Engineering Deptt.
MNIT Jaipur
8233043423
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
a href=http://www.marketersbase.com/wp-includes/theme-compat/02efpk.html;
http://www.marketersbase.com/wp-includes/theme-compat/02efpk.html/a___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
a
href=http://dalemarsden.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/podpress/optional_files/wp1.5_2.0/wp-admin/02efpk.html;
http://dalemarsden.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/podpress/optional_files/wp1.5_2.0/wp-admin/02efpk.html/a___
LibreOffice mailing list
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Hi All
All my current and past contributions made to the LibreOffice project
are done under MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+.
Until further notice, all my future contributions to the LibreOffice
project are available under MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+.
(words stolen from Albert Thuswaldner :) )
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com
Hi,
*Olivier R wrote:*
* *
*Have a look on Lightproof, the Python grammar checker:*
*http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/lightproof/*
* *
*Hunspell dictionaries can also be grammatically tagged, though only the*
*Hungarian dictionary and the French one.*
*Hunspell documentation:*
Dear Developers,
I am trying to run Libreoffice (Openoffice 3.2.1) in applet using this
documenthttp://the-music-of-time.blogspot.com/2010/01/openoffice-311-in-java-6-applet.html.
I was not able to find same for LibreOffice.org.
I have succeeded to run applet from Eclipse, where I am using
Hello All.
All my contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under the terms of
the MPL / LGPLv3+.
Best Regards
Bartolomé Sánchez Salado.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi,
On the ESC call, the consensus was to drop the [Libreoffice] subject
prefix for this list. If you try to filter based on this, please change
that to matching libreoffice.lists.freedesktop.org in the List-Id:
header.
Hopefully it works for you just well :-)
Regards,
Kendy
filters in the big enterprises' wild that don't filter on anything else
than From,To,Subject, but not any List-* header or whatsoever.
Eike
--
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 21:01 +0100, khagaroth wrote:
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Which is an abomination :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on *shrug*. You
just need to get a mail client that is modern enough (that's, like, last
decade)
Hi,
Lubos Lunak schrieb:
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on *shrug*. You
just need to get a mail client that is modern enough
On 01/25/2012 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies to my
mails, I would have said so.
This might be a controversial issue. While I too feel I don't require
to receive a personal to/cc in a response to a mail I sent to the list,
I already
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi,
Lubos Lunak schrieb:
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 01/25/2012 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies to my
mails, I would have said so.
This might be a controversial issue. While I too feel I don't require
to receive a personal
On 24/01/12 16:26, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
browsing mail
- which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between such
mailing lists
- it makes adding tags like [PUSHED] more cumbersome
- one would hope
Lubos Lunak wrote:
(and the filter-it-out suggestion is ridiculous, what if somebody really
explicitly also CC-ed me e.g. because it's urgent?).
http://help.cselabs.umn.edu/email/procmail ;)
-- Thorsten, who simply can't resist the bikeshedding
pgpORhGZR0Ryo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Fridrich Strba wrote:
On 24/01/12 16:26, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
browsing mail
- which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between
such mailing lists
- it makes
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Lubos Lunak wrote:
(and the filter-it-out suggestion is ridiculous, what if somebody really
explicitly also CC-ed me e.g. because it's urgent?).
http://help.cselabs.umn.edu/email/procmail ;)
Cool! So what exactly is the rule that
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
Oh, well, that's something people will probably never agree on *shrug*. You
just need
OK, thanks for the pointer. I withdraw my vehement opposition then
F.
On 25/01/12 16:25, Lubos Lunak wrote:
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/11/filter-messages-from-mailing-list-in.html
disagrees.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
[Libreoffice] to the beginning?
I'd be up for that, in the absence of any
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 14:05 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I don't mind the removal of [LibreOffice], but I mind messing with the
reply-to
Same here.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hello,
could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
[Libreoffice] to the beginning?
- it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
browsing mail
- which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between such
mailing
While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
[Libreoffice] to the beginning?
I'd be up for that, in the absence of any violent objections /
industrial-scale bike-shed construction, lets make a
Lubos Lunak wrote:
could this mailing list's configuration be changed to not add the pointless
[Libreoffice] to the beginning?
Yes.
- one would hope that by 2012 everybody interested in filtering mail can
actually do it based on the List-Id header, which has the additional benefit
of
--
Tschüss!
LibO 3.4.4
Windows 7 SP1 64-bit
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
Bug #: 43280
Summary: Document to mail doesn't fills subject correctly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: LibreOffice
Version: LibO 3.4 Daily
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
Paulius zadu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
||LibreOffice@bielefeldundbus
||s.de
Summary|Document to mail doesn't|Document to mail shows
|fills subject correctly |Blanks coded in subject
||line
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43280
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
What's up! wow i just found this.. i just won my iPad2 for nothing, thats
right nothing.. you need to hurry up and get yours before it to late heres
the website.. http://so.ee/K50 code 39588976/HTML
___
LibreOffice mailing list
How are you. I was messing around on the net and found this!! want a NFL
Jersey you can pick any team there only giving out!! 84 NFL Jerseys! hurry up
and get yours!! heres the link my friend.. http://sayabit.com/dbayoh/HTML
___
LibreOffice mailing
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
The original message was received at Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:32:29 +0700 from
35.150.96.253
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to 139.165.184.241:
554
Hi everybody.im sorry to bother to you, but i wasnt sure where to go, im a very
low level editor on wikipedia and i had created the libreoffice writer and
libreoffice calc articles, they are quite small articles and were copied from
the oo.o articles and then heavily modified, but im sure
Eike Rathke wrote:
There's a bunch at
http://antivirus.about.com/od/securitytips/a/fileextview.htm
Updated, thx for the ptr.
-- Thorsten
pgpL6CdIQhQls.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Thorsten,
On Saturday, 2011-09-03 18:31:57 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
attachments pass through?
Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
messages will still be delivered (that might annoy
Eike Rathke wrote:
Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've
previously had downstream filters for exactly those attachments).
As me..
Heh, you asked for it... ;)
Do we need really .zip? Btw,
Hi Thorsten,
On Sunday, 2011-09-04 15:26:29 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Eike Rathke wrote:
Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've
previously had downstream filters for exactly those
Eike Rathke wrote:
Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
attachments pass through?
Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding
messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've
previously had downstream filters for exactly those
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 01:02:51 -0500, chars...@apple.com wrote:
[... bla making it look like coming from a mailer-daemon ...]
and
[-- Attachment #2: document.exe --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Encoding: base64, Size: 29K --]
Can we do something against letting all those .exe
Hi Eike,
On 2011-09-01 at 12:18 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc.
attachments pass through?
I'd say bug against the fd.o infa...
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi all,
After a fresh clone, I'm still seeing the following build breakage in
globlmn.hrc on Mac OSX :
svx 0 #define ITEM_FORM_CONTROL_PROPERTIES !defined _GLOBLMN_HRC 3 all
Con~trol... 20110821 20:34:29
^
f640:
/Users/alex/DevHack/git/libo/workdir/unxmacxi.pro/inc/svx/globlmn.hrc,
line 1:
Le 22/08/11 12:44, Alexander Thurgood a écrit :
Please ignore this particular message, which has appeared elsewhere
already, just Gmane and/or Thunderbird doing some strange things to my
reply to list button.
Caolan has already suggested something on this elsewhere.
Alex
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Very impressed with the programme (or should I say 'program' ), but, as
a newcomer to Linux, I found the installation procedure a pain in the butt.
Brian
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello Antoine,
Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other
patches like this one.
BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to
provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
@Wol
thanks for your answer.
I've already configured with '--enable-binfilter'.
binfilter builds except some sub-dirs 'bf_sd', 'bf_svx' and
'bf_xmloff' (and some others) and I have changes ready in there
but not tested.
For 'extension', make simply answers 'Presenter Screen build disabled'
Hi all, here some nice stats. Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
code since we started to code on LO...
I used SLOCCount by David A. Wheeler to
check our project size. At the time of the fork ie the
LIBREOFFICE_CREATE tag our clone directory was this big:
Total Physical Source Lines of
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of
code since we started to code on LO...
Howdy Sebastian,
Outstanding - this is a figure we are confident enough in to publish?
Sounds like it, but just to be sure..so, this is how I put it out
#libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out
regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter.
But isn't a lot of this lines of code that were commented out, or inside #if 0?
And how much of the change is due to changes in the OOo milestones that
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 09:04 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging
fashion, without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly.
Of course, hard to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be
misinterpreted.
Right - I
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be
rather dangerous :-)
Right, and netto LOC is a pretty bad measure of productivity and
effectiveness, even if things like COCOMO (?) models andwhatnot suggest
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
a little bit more...
regards.
createFromAscii_8.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:11:07AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
caolanm-rene: Think we should use AS_HELP_STRING everywhere ?
Yeah. Good idea. Sounds like a easy hack :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:06 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:11:07AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
caolanm-rene: Think we should use AS_HELP_STRING everywhere ?
Yeah. Good idea. Sounds like a easy hack :)
oky doky, added as an easy hack.
caolanm-ronkko:
From 09a62885c6c5aea12412d9bcb37a997bce87fa2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Niko=20R=C3=B6nkk=C3=B6?= ron...@iki.fi
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 00:36:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Wrong option name in help
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary
201 - 279 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
