https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
Sakura286 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #11 from Eike Rathke ---
#3 is not possible as there is no non-NaN-payload mode implemented, and
implementing it would require not only different error handling but also
different transport of errors between intermediary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #10 from Sakura286 ---
I prefer #2, too.
I am wondering whether #2 is acceptable by community. If so, I am willing to do
a bit of work on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #9 from Rene Engelhard ---
I'd personally prefer 2.
1. has the problem that one still ships libreoffice-calc. Shipping something
which doesn't work (fails on start, even with a message) is not good.
Or 3, but I don't think
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #8 from Sakura286 ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #5)
> We might have to have a runtime check in Calc as well and bail out if NaN
> payloads are not supported.
Yes, a compile time check cannot guarantee that this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #7 from Eike Rathke ---
No explicit documents, but Calc heavily uses quiet NaNs to transport and
propagate any runtime error in the calculation interpreter engine and relies on
NaN payload propagation in all math operators.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #6 from Chen Xuan ---
Currently NaN payload are not supported by most RISC-V machines. It might be
necessary for RISC-V porters to know which component is affected by NaN
payload.
Are there any documents that describe how
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108827
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #5 from Eike Rathke ---
From
https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/g/isa-dev/c/g79dHlV4B_k/m/dtlPNaq8AwAJ
"Implementors are free to provide a NaN payload propagation scheme as a
nonstandard extension enabled by a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
--- Comment #4 from Commit Notification
---
Eike Rathke committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/2fd915b7d2d2a9e25600a07587ab01d23bffbc58
Related: tdf#152943 Test
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:7.6.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152943
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GetErrCode() doesn't work |GetErrCode() doesn't work
13 matches
Mail list logo